paradox
ab intra silentio vera
And, I think the reason for that is that the core of caring was never actually part of Scientology, and, in fact, was anathema to the core precepts and doctines as created by Ron.
It was however, what the *people* brought in to Scientology with them, and, it's what could survive, because, at the beginning and, up through the 60s, the Scientology 'movement' was more about the people attracted to it and the values they brought to it than about the totalitarian and selfish core of Scientology.
By the 70s the 'organization' had managed to wrest 'control' of the movement from the overwhelmingly well-intentioned body and now, as the human skin sloughs off, what remains is what Scientology actually is; no longer disguised by the 'wog' values that the membership brought to it.
Zinj
This is why $cn and any similar cookie-cutter type, idealized and organized philosophy will always be an utter real world failure. Which I think also accounts for much of the apparent cognitive dissonance I read and hear from those ex-cof$ $cn's such as certain freezerzoners remaining loyal to the idealism of the philosophy and cookie-cutter type (but individualized!) one-size-fits-all technology, as if it could really bring about the organized utopia envisioned.
...interesting.

Zing!!
I was "buying in" even then - before I even knew any "orgs" existed at all!? 