What's new

ESMB and The Freezone - let's have it out!

Status
Not open for further replies.
:confused2:

Hey, what happened to my post?!? If some Mod. deleted it I want to why? Is the Mod. some Freezone lackey??

I'm copying all these posts I make and I WILL keep re-posting them. The title of the thread IS "..let's have it out!" fer crissakes!

:angry:

Your post was deleted because it was an obvious attempt to reinvigorate an acrimonious spat that was already in dying.

If you repost it, it will be deleted again. If you continue to attempt to force it, you may be removed.

Thor
 
:confused2:

Hey, what happened to my post?!? If some Mod. deleted it I want to why? Is the Mod. some Freezone lackey??

I'm copying all these posts I make and I WILL keep re-posting them. The title of the thread IS "..let's have it out!" fer crissakes!

:angry:

Well, if we shouldn't block the Freedom of Speech for freezoners, the least we should do is suppress Roan's Freedom of Speech!
 
Your post was deleted because it was an obvious attempt to reinvigorate an acrimonious spat that was already in dying.

If you repost it, it will be deleted again. If you continue to attempt to force it, you may be removed.

Thor

Oh my fucking God!

Who the fuck are you?

The Great God Thor?
 
I agree & I thank you for removing it. I've a slightly differing take on the whys & wherefores of the original IFA post, but even there I agree it was inappropriate as written as too much personal data was disclosed.


Mark A. Baker

Actually, I copypastad it from an Anon board, and then when I saw it had been removed from IFA I blanked it out here. It was also removed from the Anon board as well. The original post named no names. However it was easy to infer from the data given.
 
I didn't say those things Cat's Squirrel. I didn't say freezoners are "bullshitters". I said:

"Vigilant in not tolerating bullshit" is not the same thing as saying that freezoners are bullshitters. I have had no problems at all with any of your posts that I have seen. The kind of "bullshit" I was talking about (and sorry to keep repeating that word) was for example, in the 'L' thread with the blatantly self-promotional 'sucess story'. Another example would be the inappropriate 'Welcome to the freezone' posts.

I also said that proper discussion should be tolerated.

I didn't say anyone should be shot down, I said the ideas should be shot down, this is entirely different, as here:

Yes you are right. I will try harder.

Zander

OK, fair enough.

In all honesty I may have been at fault as well in that I use Scientology language very freely on ESMB - I find it a useful shorthand for a lot of the concepts I'm trying to communicate about here - and that probably upsets a few people who have had a bellyful of the SO and associate Scientology tech jargon with them. I may have to give that more thought in future.
 
Your post was deleted because it was an obvious attempt to reinvigorate an acrimonious spat that was already in dying.

If you repost it, it will be deleted again. If you continue to attempt to force it, you may be removed.

Thor

:nervous:
 
OK, fair enough.

In all honesty I may have been at fault as well in that I use Scientology language very freely on ESMB - I find it a useful shorthand for a lot of the concepts I'm trying to communicate about here - and that probably upsets a few people who have had a bellyful of the SO and associate Scientology tech jargon with them. I may have to give that more thought in future.


No problem Cat's :coolwink: (or is it Squirrel for short ? )

Zander
 
Just how egregious of an ethics violation (I'm talking about real world ethics violation, real ethics not your crackpot Scientology Ethics) has to occur for some you putty-brains to realize that NOTHING GOOD comes of trying to practice Scientology?!? It's a rank, vile waste body of knowledge that needs to be consigned to the dustbin of history.

What's next?!? A Freezone auditor molesting a child PC and then you Ron-Bots will STILL defend your fucking "freedom" to practice your deluded pile of nonsense?!?!? :angry:

The party is over, Freezoners. You've been un-masked to show exactly what you are.

I'm sorry Paul, I respect you as a person and as a "historian" of Scientology but I am really, REALLY ANGRY ABOUT THIS!!
 
Last edited:
OK, fair enough.

In all honesty I may have been at fault as well in that I use Scientology language very freely on ESMB - I find it a useful shorthand for a lot of the concepts I'm trying to communicate about here - and that probably upsets a few people who have had a bellyful of the SO and associate Scientology tech jargon with them. I may have to give that more thought in future.

The thing I find about using scientologeese is that it stops one thinking of other ways to express things, not using the lanuage tends to make the brain shift into a different gear and creates, IMO, a more critical thinking process which cannot be anything but healthy. Sure, it communicate to a degree certain concepts, however these 'concepts' are $cientology concepts and not necesserily human and emotional ones. I used to do it myself, however trying not to do it, has helped me to become much more aware, awake and helps my brain to 'think' more.
 
If anyone disagrees with my decision, I'd suggest they PM Emma. In the meantime I will delete all references to this post. Repeated reposting will result in a temporary ban.

If anyone doesn't like that, they're welcome to take it up with Emma.

Thor
 
Just how egregious of an ethics violation (I'm talking about real world ethics violation, real ethics not your crackpot Scientology Ethics) has to occur for some you putty-brains to realize that NOTHING GOOD comes of trying to practice Scientology?!? It's a rank, vile waste body of knowledge that needs to be consigned to the dustbin of history.

What's next?!? A Freezone auditor molesting a child PC and then you Ron-Bots will STILL defend your fucking "freedom" to practice your deluded pile of nonsense?!?!? :angry:

The party is over, Freezoners. You've been un-masked to show exactly what you are.

:lol: Roan?

Meet Boldgirl and PixieGal.

You three should have a lot to discuss!
 
Hey Roan,

Civility helps on this board. Otherwise you might find people hang up on the invective and don't get to appreciate any valid points you might be making.

Paul

He is obviously feeling very emotional about this and this is perhaps the only way he can express his anger and his feelings right now. I understand this totally, it's diffcult to continue to stifle one's human emotions whether that be anger, frustration or whatever, when they have been stifled to the hilt for years on end. This sort of expression IMO is all part of the healing process and should therefore be allowed to be expressed of course on the correct thread and not blatantly in others faces as is with the freezone.
 
Just like the voting scene in "One Flew Over the Cuckoo's Nest", ESMB has erupted into a flurry of free speech!!

And then Thor, (Nurse Ratched) suppresses it all again.

Will McMurphy get Candy and her friend to come over?

Will Scatman Crothers get fired?

Will Billy kill himself?

Stay tuned for another episode of "One Flew Over ESMB"!
 
Last edited:
Put another way; what we all have in common here is a dislike often amounting to detestation of the way the CofS conducts itself and a strong desire to see that change. Everything else is detail we can clear up later.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top