What's new

Successful actions in helping the Sydney field

Carmel

Crusader
In recent months, we have been successful in getting many of our old mates in the Sydney region (and other States in ANZO) who are still "in", to take a good look and "see" the actual scene. Some of these people are now members of this board, and many are 'lurking'.

We are putting this thread here, in response to requests from others who are wanting to have similar success with people within their sphere of influence, and to assist those who we have already helped, to do the same. While we are aware that what we have been doing in these parts, would be of no interest to many and/or not something that many of you would be interested in doing yourself - you may find a tip or two, that could help you with a friend or two.

Successful actions:

- Posting our own stories (truths from local people, or people who are known have a far greater impingement)

- Contacting old friends directly (nothing to lose on this one - we were out and they were in......our "friendships" had little future anyway)

- Maintaining points of their reality. While we have a particular mindset, it would be foolish to try and convey that to our friends who are still in. They would just reject it outright! We know our mates and enough of what they have seen and done, to find much that is wrong and/or alarming, to direct their attention to. Things like the basics evolution for example (enforced purchase of book packages, 300 calls a week etc, etc) has worked in our favour.

- Using tech and policy references (that they obviously feel should be abided by) to support the 'argument' - like precept 17 of WTH, "Look Don't Listen", Data Series 2 Section "Illogic", The Creed, SOS Chapter 27 - "Methods Used by Subject to Handle Others", C/S Series 73RB, "The Hidden Data Line", KSW 1 (particularly in reference to the 'group agreement' within orgs that allows the general operating basis to continue). Flows 1,2,3 and 0 in tech dict (in reference to responsibilty that should be taken by individuals and by the orgs themselves).

- Not blowing them out of the water with any real or perceived negativity re LRH, or the tech. It's not their reality and they'll just reject it (and probably whoever is suggesting it). That's something that they can stumble across, look at and work out for themselves - at a later time when they have an open mindset.

- Copying and pasting appropriate stories or posts from the board (excluding comments from members that would be out reality or cause upset), and emailing them to any and every address obtainable (of those within the ranks), with the link reference of ESMB as the source of the story or post.

- In dealing with a particular person, finding posts or threads that would specifically be real to them and impinging on them (then copying, pasting and sending to them, with reference to ESMB). For example, if the person thinks that the sun shines out of DM's arse, then for goodness sake - DON"T direct them to "Musical Chairs"...they'll just reject it, and consider that you've probably 'lost it'. However, if the person already considers DM a snake - then go for it. Find and choose stuff that will align with the reality of the person who you're dealing with.

- Encouraging them to look at the board, but initially to only look at categories like "Staff War Stories" and "Leaving the Church" (so as not to blow them away before they get a grasp on things). And, giving them the scoop on the fact that on the board there are all sorts, who are everything from 'pro' LRH and the tech, to very 'anti' LRH and the tech......and everything in between.

- Initially supporting those who are newly "out", then hooking them up with others who are in the same or a similar position.

- Encouraging others to contact their mates and help them.

Simply through doing the above, we have successfully helped many open their eyes, change their perspective and take the appropriate action. Some of these people are now doing the same with people who they know. It's not always 'a walk in the park', but the wins certainly far outweigh the losses. Most importantly many are being enlightened (or have been), to the actual scene, and are getting their lives back.

All the best with it!

Cheers,
Carmel
 
Last edited:

Terril park

Sponsor
Simply through doing the above, we have successfully helped many open their eyes, change their perspective and take the appropriate action. Some of these people are now doing the same with people who they know. It's not always 'a walk in the park', but the wins certainly far outweigh the losses. Most importantly many are being enlightened (or have been), to the actual scene, and are getting their lives back.

All the best with it!

Cheers,
Carmel

That's very interesting. Even as little as a year ago I 'd guess losses would out weigh wins in such endeavors.
 

EP - Ethics Particle

Gold Meritorious Patron
The turning tide!

That's very interesting. Even as little as a year ago I 'd guess losses would out weigh wins in such endeavors.[/QUOTE]

I feel the same way Terril. :yes: The situation has changed considerably from a year ago - and even more significantly over the past 3 months from my observations. :thumbsup:

Actions that would have been unthinkable before are now "biting" and now is the time to press even harder, IMHO! :yes: :clap:

Roy/EP
 

alex

Gold Meritorious Patron
In recent months, we have been successful in getting many of our old mates in the Sydney region (and other States in ANZO) who are still "in", to take a good look and "see" the actual scene. Some of these people are now members of this board, and many are 'lurking'.

We are putting this thread here, in response to requests from others who are wanting to have similar success with people within their sphere of influence, and to assist those who we have already helped, to do the same. While we are aware that what we have been doing in these parts, would be of no interest to many and/or not something that many of you would be interested in doing yourself - you may find a tip or two, that could help you with a friend or two.

Successful actions:

- Posting our own stories (truths from local people, or people who are known have a far greater impingement)

- Contacting old friends directly (nothing to lose on this one - we were out and they were in......our "friendships" had little future anyway)

- Maintaining points of their reality. While we have a particular mindset, it would be foolish to try and convey that to our friends who are still in. They would just reject it outright! We know our mates and enough of what they have seen and done, to find much that is wrong and/or alarming, to direct their attention to. Things like the basics evolution for example (enforced purchase of book packages, 300 calls a week etc, etc) has worked in our favour.

- Using tech and policy references (that they obviously feel should be abided by) to support the 'argument' - like precept 17 of WTH, "Look Don't Listen", Data Series 2 Section "Illogic", The Creed, SOS Chapter 27 - "Methods Used by Subject to Handle Others", C/S Series 73RB, "The Hidden Data Line", KSW 1 (particularly in reference to the 'group agreement' within orgs that allows the general operating basis to continue). Flows 1,2,3 and 0 in tech dict (in reference to responsibilty that should be taken by individuals and by the orgs themselves).

- Not blowing them out of the water with any real or perceived negativity re LRH, or the tech. It's not their reality and they'll just reject it (and probably whoever is suggesting it). That's something that they can stumble across, look at and work out for themselves - at a later time when they have an open mindset.

- Copying and pasting appropriate stories or posts from the board (excluding comments from members that would be out reality or cause upset), and emailing them to any and every address obtainable (of those within the ranks), with the link reference of ESMB as the source of the story or post.

- In dealing with a particular person, finding posts or threads that would specifically be real to them and impinging on them (then copying, pasting and sending to them, with reference to ESMB). For example, if the person thinks that the sun shines out of DM's arse, then for goodness sake - DON"T direct them to "Musical Chairs"...they'll just reject it, and consider that you've probably 'lost it'. However, if the person already considers DM a snake - then go for it. Find and choose stuff that will align with the reality of the person who you're dealing with.

- Encouraging them to look at the board, but initially to only look at categories like "Staff War Stories" and "Leaving the Church" (so as not to blow them away before they get a grasp on things). And, giving them the scoop on the fact that on the board there are all sorts, who are everything from 'pro' LRH and the tech, to very 'anti' LRH and the tech......and everything in between.

- Initially supporting those who are newly "out", then hooking them up with others who are in the same or a similar position.

- Encouraging others to contact their mates and help them.

Simply through doing the above, we have successfully helped many open their eyes, change their perspective and take the appropriate action. Some of these people are now doing the same with people who they know. It's not always 'a walk in the park', but the wins certainly far outweigh the losses. Most importantly many are being enlightened (or have been), to the actual scene, and are getting their lives back.

All the best with it!

Cheers,
Carmel

It sounds as if you are using the same tactics the church uses, success stories, cutting off data that is not pleasant or supportive of your position, and peer pressure.

I am sure you will be successful in converting people to your viewpoint.

It is interesting to watch "Simon Bolivar" in action. (IF you take away someones game, the game becomes get you).

Is the one side of the dicotomy any closer to the attainment of spiritual enlightenment than the other?

alex
 

ScudMuffin

Silver Meritorious Patron
It sounds as if you are using the same tactics the church uses, success stories, cutting off data that is not pleasant or supportive of your position, and peer pressure.

TBH, yeah. The cos hands us the ammo anyway, you have to pursuade people to turn around and see the big picture anyway so why not use some of the CoS tactics against it? It's like putting together a video of harrassment of anons or a compilation protest video, would you use the Bournmouth, Plymouth or Puthy vids? I wouldn't because there's some objectional behaviour of protesters on there. Would the CoS do the same thing for their side? Sure.

But then again there's two sides to every story, those in are getting the SCN side, we're giving them the Anon side, they can put the two together and come up with their own view.
 

Carmel

Crusader
It sounds as if you are using the same tactics the church uses, success stories, cutting off data that is not pleasant or supportive of your position, and peer pressure.
Yes, I am using much of what I learned in the church to help people simply look and see (just as I use much of what I learned through Scn, in my everyday life). If people are happy to remain in Scientology with their eyes wide open then all power to them, but if they have been blinded and are enslaved, then that's a different matter - I'll use what I know to help, and unlike the church tactics, it is far from harmful!

I am sure you will be successful in converting people to your viewpoint.
As I am sure you are aware, this is not what I am doing and nor my wish or intent. Once someone looks and is free again to think, viewpoints are boundless - and in actual fact, I know of no-one who shares mine!

It is interesting to watch "Simon Bolivar" in action. (IF you take away someones game, the game becomes get you).
Yep, and right back atchya!

Is the one side of the dicotomy any closer to the attainment of spiritual enlightenment than the other?
Given that one side is entrapment/enslavement and the other is a world that is one's oyster - I think so, yes!
 
Last edited:

Feral

Rogue male
Well said Scud,

We are presenting a balance of data to a group that has only had the sugary sweet PR of the cult to orient their doubt formulas on. There is nothing wrong with pointing out the opposing side.

For instance NONE in the cult knew that Lisa MacPhearson comped L11 just a couple of weeks prior to spinning. They don't know that solo nots completion Greg Bashaw killed himself. Or that there are less than 50,000 scios in the church, not the 10,000,000 the cult claims. They don't know that Larry Wollershiem was paid $8.2 mil or that Mayo won a multi million dollar settlement. Or that Greg and Debra Barnes were declared for putting in KSW 1 at flag. Most do not even know that Ron was married three times.

They have been fed a diet of pure church PR, well, at least mushrooms thrive on that stuff.

All those things can be googled and used to find out the facts yourself.


TBH, yeah. The cos hands us the ammo anyway, you have to pursuade people to turn around and see the big picture anyway so why not use some of the CoS tactics against it? It's like putting together a video of harrassment of anons or a compilation protest video, would you use the Bournmouth, Plymouth or Puthy vids? I wouldn't because there's some objectional behaviour of protesters on there. Would the CoS do the same thing for their side? Sure.

But then again there's two sides to every story, those in are getting the SCN side, we're giving them the Anon side, they can put the two together and come up with their own view.
 

dchoiceisalwaysrs

Gold Meritorious Patron
Well said Scud,

We are presenting a balance of data to a group that has only had the sugary sweet PR of the cult to orient their doubt formulas on. There is nothing wrong with pointing out the opposing side.

For instance NONE in the cult knew that Lisa MacPhearson comped L11 just a couple of weeks prior to spinning. They don't know that solo nots completion Greg Bashaw killed himself. Or that there are less than 50,000 scios in the church, not the 10,000,000 the cult claims. They don't know that Larry Wollershiem was paid $8.2 mil or that Mayo won a multi million dollar settlement. Or that Greg and Debra Barnes were declared for putting in KSW 1 at flag. Most do not even know that Ron was married three times.

They have been fed a diet of pure church PR, well, at least mushrooms thrive on that stuff.

All those things can be googled and used to find out the facts yourself.

You are so correct Kevin, I didn't know any of those data until two years ago, and then only about the Barnes until late January this year. I had been "in" scientology since 1973.:blush:
 
It sounds as if you are using the same tactics the church uses, success stories, cutting off data that is not pleasant or supportive of your position, and peer pressure.

I am sure you will be successful in converting people to your viewpoint.

It is interesting to watch "Simon Bolivar" in action. (IF you take away someones game, the game becomes get you).

Is the one side of the dicotomy any closer to the attainment of spiritual enlightenment than the other?

alex

Yes let's all follow rons advice and watch simon bolivar in action
 

alex

Gold Meritorious Patron
Yes let's all follow rons advice and watch simon bolivar in action

Well I don't think Ron advised "watching" it in action, it reads more like a warning about the consequences of a certain path, which now seems to be trod by several differing gangs.

I mean to suggest that perhaps some path can be imagined which leads to old friends not being enemies, and old goals still pursued.

Alas, a fools errand, with windmills aplenty...

But then how else to spend time in Bulgravia.
 

Stan D'Teque

Patron with Honors
There's no enemies here Alex, we even love OSA trolls! The problem is the Co$ has assumed (with no justification per the available facts) the high moral ground and refuse to even glance at the contrary data surrounding it. The game isn't getting the Co$ - it's getting our friends out of the Co$ before it implodes and there really is a mess to clean up. Hence this thread with its handy tips to salvage beings from the reactive pit of the Bridge to Nowhere as my mate feral so aptly described it.
 

Megalomaniac

Silver Meritorious Patron
Land of Liars and Truth-Tellers

I find myself listening to two groups of people: Scientologists in good standing, and Others. On many points each group says the other is lying, or is delusional, or misled, or partly evil. :catfight: Whom should I believe? :confused2:

One clue is that one of these groups threatens disconnection if I communicate with the other group. The other group does not pretend to have such authority over me. This is my biggest clue. :think:

Thanks Carmel. I was already doing some of your successful action. I am pondering your use of gradients. Sometimes it seems more honest to skip a gradient, but it does causes an emotional shock, and ARC break. Actually, I think it's ok to say something incredible ("blow them away"), as long as you're prepared with supporting evidence and arguments. I guess the supporting evidence is the gradient.

One thing I objected to in Scientology is that there is such a thing as a dissemination drill. I don't think it works. I think it backfires because the recipient can usually tell that you have a hidden agenda. I guess that's it. The disseminator is hiding something right off the bat. He is hiding the fact that he is doing a pre-canned procedure, instead of just communicating. That's a withold. That immediately cuts the communication and introverts the disseminator a little or a lot. If I wanted to convince you that Ron Paul is the best choice for president, for example, I think you'd be happiest to know my intention up front. It might even be proper to ask you if you're willing to listen to my propaganda. If I'm up front with you, if I don't succeed in convincing you, at least you'd know I was honest with you. You might come back for another conversation with me that way.

I think my successful action has been to deal with people as people, attempting to push stereotypes out of my mind and just see the individual as he is. Communicate to the individual. But for me "success" means to hold my own and not get introverted. I have not successfully gotten anyone to seriously look.

Mac
 

sandygirl

Silver Meritorious Patron
Carmel

Your "viewpoint" is brilliant!! It certainly applies to situations I have found myself in lately.

One quick question-HOW to be more patient with those of the $cio mindset? One of my biggest flaws seems to be annoyance with family members who just can't see it. Guess I have to up the affinity and comm to get them to accept my R!!!

This post was a good one as this has been something I have been thinking about quite a bit lately.
 
Oh alex.....

It sounds as if you are using the same tactics the church uses, success stories, cutting off data that is not pleasant or supportive of your position, and peer pressure.

I am sure you will be successful in converting people to your viewpoint.

It is interesting to watch "Simon Bolivar" in action. (IF you take away someones game, the game becomes get you).

Is the one side of the dicotomy any closer to the attainment of spiritual enlightenment than the other?

alex

Alex in Denial....denial.... the truth is NOT a conversion process $cilontology is & thass why you think that way (dicotomy is Dichotomy BTW: check your m/u)

Oh & you have yet to say what your (you claim them-not me) benefits of being IN are, I think they must be v.small or they exist only in your head....spirit? or your thought process....?

& Too; nobody has said leave the tech, just leave the cult & get your $ciloon stuff elsewhere, its less squirreled, less controlling & a darn sight less totalitarian....clear the planet?

Did you in your arrogance ever ask if I/other humans wanted it cleared????

I can see why you cannot respond to me; you are not yet at a level that can:happydance:

look for yourself Alex, look at the cult that frames your every thought & stops you from looking for yourself....your nazi cult is getting its just rewards.
 
Last edited:
Top