Can you wear pink in you avatar?
I missed the memo. What is up with that?
Can you wear pink in you avatar?
Oh, I think you must have missed the witch hunt hysteria of a couple or so weeks ago. On and on and on and on about trolls trolls trolls. Lots of unspecified posts- more than one thread, too- making vague insinuations that there are trolls here trying to disrupt things, never naming anyone (Well, it would have been a breach of the rules of conduct for them to do so, so I guess that's why.), but the upshot was that anyone tangling with anyone else who had a minority viewpoint was considered by a couple people to be trolls. A similar approach has been used on a number of boards re OSA witchhunt and hysteria. People posting enough info about themselves to disprove such insinuations and accusations were then accused of doing OSA's work.
The only thing you can do is continue to post from your heart as to what you feel. There are plenty of non CofS Scn'ists on here who get along with most of the contributors here. So just establish your own track record, be true to yourself, and rock on!
Best dancer here!
I missed the memo. What is up with that?
I managed an Arthur Murray Studio and am a Gold Medal dancer. I doubt that you can compete with that. However, I do agree with most of what you post.
CHLNG
http://forum.exscn.net/showthread.php?t=5936
When you read the thread, imagine all the avatars wearing something pink. For example, my original avatar does not wear earphones and pearls and Terril does not have a hat.
The subject of Clear and it's handling has been full of screw-ups in Scn. I've had to do a few CCRD Auditor and C/S courses because of Miscavige and his know best. I actually avoided putting together a CCRD delivery team at my org because I saw how much confusion was on these lines at other orgs. That and the Comm Evs for concerned tech terminals all the time was enough to not want anything to do with them.
Sounds like something got messed up on yours. Too bad. Inval and eval, or a bad date/locate, are the likely reasons.
Bullshit!, and talk about eval, try even wrong indication or dare I say BLACK SCIENTOLOGY. What is your game?
If you really think that all there is between the state of clear as defined in DMSMH and the statements above is some eval, inval and a messed up D/L you really are dreaming.
As Jason Beghe said; " Show me a mother fucken clear"
http://forum.exscn.net/showthread.php?t=5936
When you read the thread, imagine all the avatars wearing something pink. For example, my original avatar does not wear earphones and pearls and Terril does not have a hat.
In one of her more enlightened moments, Emma decided that pink was the new black...... And enforced it with real good command intention!
What I'm struggling to come to terms with here is that we have an upsurge of Aussies here, and few if any from San Francisco?
At the end of the day, the state of "Clear" is a scientology state and thus only exists within the framework of scientology.
What religions, other practices and techniques have as a possible similar state are called by different names and have other descriptions.
Does the state of "Clear" exist? of course it does. It was invented in scientology and that is where it exists. There is a lot more crap added to Clear now too, such as how "clears" go into temper fits, that is widely used by people as an excuse to behave as spoiled children.
I don't think the DMSMH description is accurate either.
The state of Clear is still desirable, though.
If it was a wrong indication, maybe telling you that you didn't make it is a better one.
So one is only Clear if one is still in Scientology? Got ya.
Thank you, you are so helpful!......Gee, are you clear??? Did you......"make it" Martini?
Did you learn to handle comm like that on your training??? Personal inval and practiced wrong indications seem to be your specialty.
You may have been specially trained, eh?
Is a troll considered someone who expresses a different view than the consensus on this board? I see this term thrown around a lot in the threads I've been looking at.
I don't get it. We all just got out of a mind control cult and now it seems a similar op basis exists here. If someone expresses something other than Scientology sucks 100% and is a fraud, they are called a troll.
That's group think at its best.
No, it's my 'think', and you know exactly what you are doing, and so do I.
No, it's my 'think', and you know exactly what you are doing, and so do I.
Well I certainly am due some eval apparently, so why don't you enlighten me and anyone else what exactly I am up to.