What's new

The Little Thread Which Grew - the Apollo '73 to Everything But

Status
Not open for further replies.

Leon

Gold Meritorious Patron
Regarding Identities and Goals.

The Service Fac is the this-lifetime identity > it is the Beingness the guy adopted in order to "handle" life. it rests on the BE side of Be-Do-Have.

The Goal is the Have that the guy hopes to achieve with his ServFac.

They both together form the top buttons of the current GPM cycle the guy is on.

Where you have one you have the other.

Any person has ONE Service Fac. The bulletin that says there are many makes it clear that there are "many" Lock Service facs. but there is only one real actual genuine dinkum core-of the-PT-bank Servfac.

And you know you've got it not by the E-meter but by the fact that the entire this-lifetime case of the preclear falls to pieces. If that hasn't happened then yopu don't have the item.
 
Last edited:

moontaco

Patron with Honors
My observation backs up yours, because Al Gore speaks like a Robot and just

sounds like a windup toy on full automatic. :duh::duh:
Many people are as lifeless as Al Gore. I suspect that's been the case for many years, going back way before the prevalence of psych meds.

Personally--and I am speaking as a non-OT--I don't think it's possible to judge, just from watching Gore in video clips, whether he is on meds, much less how many and what kind. (Well, perhaps really heavy-duty meds, with obvious side effects, like anti-psychotics, but not antidepressants.) It would be interesting to do a test of Lakey's abilities in that area. You know...get a bunch of people together, videotape them, have Lakey watch them and provide his analyses of which ones are on meds, etc. :D
 
Warning! I'm not a very qualified tech terminal.
I believe I keyed out of that area that may be called the " Furies."
Hoping I can make this more understandable to others.
Just had an example in UK news of a guy who killed his wife and daughter and then himself.
Maybe his wife didn't prepare his dinner? Or whatever. Perhaps this triggered his fury.
Long ago old problems got restimmed. Maybe his gun loader in space wars didn't fetch enough ammo. Maybe his Cardinal didn't promote him, whatever.
He was furious, and acted back then, and it may have a content of make self right.....by being rightious!

So. Can anyone explain why FPRD can't handle this sort of thing?

BB,

there are two important areas to auditing. The written tech questions, commands, and theory.

and

the safety of the auditor and the organization's space. I think it would be safe to say that a PC would open up, allow themselves to view dicey incidents, non physical universe incidents, touchy stuff that a bad auditor or organization could (and would) hurt you with in a safe environ. The contributors to this thread, I would trust with my fragile self. i wouldn't let a current Flag or Freewinds auditor ask me"Do birds fly?"

My statement above is true for when I was at Flag for a week in 1979. I didn't trust them. I had left in 1976 because I didn't trust the guy at the top of the pecking order. Generally speaking, an organization is a macrocosmic view of the person at the top.

As Tatum O'Neill said about her dad, Ryan O'Neill in the movie "Paper Moon," "If he's got scruples, it's damn sure they aren't his."

So to start with, one needs an auditor who will grant you full and total beingness to find what you find.

having done some of this auditing on others, i can tell you that the auditor needs to be huge (as huge or huger than the PC gets - and that is giganimous). And the auditor's space needs to be clean as a whistle.

With all the insanity in the Co$, that auditor is not going to be working for the church.
Next you mention the FPRD, the False Purpose Run Down.

Let's just take that dude in Colorado last week, who is OT 7. He shot an employee several times in the head. Then he shot himself. He was experiencing the furies.

O.J. Simpson (still not a Jew), when he stabbed his ex wife and her boy friend, was experiencing the furies.

The furies are all consuming destruction intentions (with action unleashed)

Over the last thirty years there hasn't been anything in the way of tech that really changed lives like that of the 50s and 60s. It was all dumbed down and made usable for an ever lower bar of auditor ability.

Just like military pilots, who could do extraordinary things in a jet, were chosen for the US Space program, they didn't get to demonstrate the competence in tin cans shot into the atmosphere.

Skills like ITSA and 2 way comm fell out of common use. Muzzled auditing, just the commands (and nothing else), is never going to get you PC fully re creating, in PT, damage laden incidents of a sketchy nature, that they can then view, in a new unit of time, and change their mind about. The PC has to have the space to holographically create anew huge "earthquakes" of theta. A PC can't as is something that they can't fully recreate.

I hope this answers your question.
 
Last edited:

hbeer

Patron with Honors
Travelling

Hi Friends,


just a quick note to let you know that I am travelling, either today or on one of the next days. Quite a bit of randomity at the moment, but I haven't died and I didn't lose interest :)


See you soon,
 
Why is this discussion important?

The question was put to me in a PM, why discuss this stuff that nobody, 'cept a few of us understand.

transparency

Transparency is a big buzz word in business circles. If Enron or Reed Slatkin or Bernie Madoff had had transparency, none of the economic calamities that befell their clients would have occurred.

If, we, the constituents of Scientology Inc., had had transparency, we would all be on the same team still.

The Freezoners and Churchies, who rely on authority, have their heads in paper bags. The Freezoners and Independents, who can FREELY discuss the merits of a system, the underlying theories, and processes of their techs are going to build better mouse traps.

Or better yet, better tech for helping you, freeing you and optimizing you, dear gentle reader.

As a kid I was a huge fan of Judy Garland, Frank Sinatra, Al Jolson, Bob Hope, and Bing Crosby - to name a few.

I can tell you younger readers already think I have one foot in the grave.

Judy Garland had huge talent. She could own the world with her likeness on the flickering screen. She was on drugs, she had her demons. As a person, she grew up to be a train wreck - but a train wreck that could captivate an audience live and in person.

Frank went from top of the charts to unable to get a job to back to the top. Al Martino played him in "The Godfather"

Jolson was on top, then he fell to nada, then the movie, "The Jolson Story," where he was played by Larry Parks, catapulted him back to fame and performing.

Bing and Bob just sailed along on various "Road Trips," never falling from grace.

THIS DICHOTOMY is what has always held my interest. Some greats have risen to the top and stayed there, and others have roller coastered.

Look at Steve Jobs. He co created Apple. Got fired for being an asshole. Rode to the top again with Pixar. Got rehired and fired Apple up for another run at the Moon. Joined Pixar to Walt Disney, and became, arguably, the most powerful person in the entertainment industry.

On the other hand, look at Howard Hughes. He was a daring aviator, a studio boss, owner of airlines and casinos. he died with fingernails that were four inches long, hiding form everyone.

More than anything I want to help my children, my grand children, my friends, and everybody else to not end up in the tank like Howard Hughes.

There have been highly trained auditors, who became homeless (LaMont Johnson is the only one who owned that statement). There have been highly trained auditors with nutty family situations. There are so many, there isn't any point in aiming my finger.

If the auditors can't heal their own, then Houston, we have a problem.

By discussing tech on a well read public forum, we have witnesses to transparency of tech theory and practice. We give you, gentle readers, choices and insights into how it all really works. If you can differentiate a particular approach that ** might ** help you in an area of your life, then these tappings on keyboards around the world are not in vain.

You can interject, and say, "I don't get this." On Ifachat on yahoo groups, you are just stupid and wrong. Here, you are a co equal creator of this thread. Make it yours. Insist on fun reading and understandable posts.
 

lkwdblds

Crusader
Thanks for letting us know, we will miss your presence

Hi Friends,


just a quick note to let you know that I am travelling, either today or on one of the next days. Quite a bit of randomity at the moment, but I haven't died and I didn't lose interest :)


See you soon,

We will miss your presence, even if its only for a day or two.

Comments on Carmelo's posts about tech discussions.

I think having a lot of discussions about the tech are very good and that this thread has done well with a lot of technical information being discussed since the thread has made a concerted effort to expand its scope to something much bigger than just the leaving story of one relatively obscure former staff and Sea Org member.

I believe that tech discussion interspersed with colorful and meaningful posts concerning other controversial topics such as the topic that I introduced about Al Gore is where the thread shines best. Occasionally there will be times when perhaps 5 technical posts will occur in a row, Still no problem. If there are more than 5 tech posts in a row, in my opinion, I or someone else should interject a non tech topic just for the sake of variety.

LRH Tech and ALAN WALTER'S TECH AND ITS OFFSHOOTS.

On an ex Scientologists web site thread, most people have had a lot of exposure to LRH tech and can track well when it is discussed. Alan's tech and its offshoots are specialty areas and not very many ESMB members are extremely familiar with it. The ones who are interested in it seem to be among the most highly trained people in all of ESMB. I would never suggest to these "STARS" that they should not post tech discussions about Alan's tech. Often in one of these discussions, people not at all versed in Alan's tech can get an idea of what it is about and this is a good thing.

My only concern is that if two or more Alan Walters advocates get into a very long discussion and there are more than 5 posts in a row with nothing being discussed except Alan Walter's tech, a lot of the other participants may be intimidated or get bored or both and may just figure the thread has moved in a new direction and just stop participating. Something like this happening would harm the thread and take us out of the Power condition we currently are in. This would hurt the very tech experts that we are trying to help and to give a forum to.

That is my take on it. Tech posts - YES!, Alan Wallters Tech posts - YES! but always have a little non tech going of a general or amusing nature as well. It would be something analgous to publishing a fine newspaper. You would want to have as fine an editorial page as possible and an expansion of the editorial page would be key in publishing a great newspaper but if this was carried too far, many readers would let their subscriptions lapse. We still have to provide the sports page, the movie listings, the advertising pages and the comic, crossword puzzle, suddoko game and the Cryptogram so as to make the newspaper more enjoyable and give those important editorial writers as big an audience to reach as possible. This analogy represents perfectly, in my opinion, how this thread should be run.

We run with a big tent philosophy, but all groups big and small under our tent must be continuously represented.
Lakey
 
Last edited:
Thanks for checking in!

Hi Friends,


just a quick note to let you know that I am travelling, either today or on one of the next days. Quite a bit of randomity at the moment, but I haven't died and I didn't lose interest :)


See you soon,

Bon voyage, Heidrun, happy trails to you! Send us some theta postcards of nice views or pleasant people, will ya? :)
 
Transparency in Leaders, as well as Auditors, is Important!

The question was put to me in a PM, why discuss this stuff that nobody, 'cept a few of us understand.

transparency

Transparency is a big buzz word in business circles. If Enron or Reed Slatkin or Bernie Madoff had had transparency, none of the economic calamities that befell their clients would have occurred.

If, we, the constituents of Scientology Inc., had had transparency, we would all be on the same team still.

The Freezoners and Churchies, who rely on authority, have their heads in paper bags. The Freezoners and Independents, who can FREELY discuss the merits of a system, the underlying theories, and processes of their techs are going to build better mouse traps.

Or better yet, better tech for helping you, freeing you and optimizing you, dear gentle reader.

As a kid I was a huge fan of Judy Garland, Frank Sinatra, Al Jolson, Bob Hope, and Bing Crosby - to name a few.

I can tell you younger readers already think I have one foot in the grave.

Judy Garland had huge talent. She could own the world with her likeness on the flickering screen. She was on drugs, she had her demons. As a person, she grew up to be a train wreck - but a train wreck that could captivate an audience live and in person.

Frank went from top of the charts to unable to get a job to back to the top. Al Martino played him in "The Godfather"

Jolson was on top, then he fell to nada, then the movie, "The Jolson Story," where he was played by Larry Parks, catapulted him back to fame and performing.

Bing and Bob just sailed along on various "Road Trips," never falling from grace.

THIS DICHOTOMY is what has always held my interest. Some greats have risen to the top and stayed there, and others have roller coastered.

Look at Steve Jobs. He co created Apple. Got fired for being an asshole. Rode to the top again with Pixar. Got rehired and fired Apple up for another run at the Moon. Joined Pixar to Walt Disney, and became, arguably, the most powerful person in the entertainment industry.

On the other hand, look at Howard Hughes. He was a daring aviator, a studio boss, owner of airlines and casinos. he died with fingernails that were four inches long, hiding form everyone.

More than anything I want to help my children, my grand children, my friends, and everybody else to not end up in the tank like Howard Hughes.

There have been highly trained auditors, who became homeless (LaMont Johnson is the only one who owned that statement). There have been highly trained auditors with nutty family situations. There are so many, there isn't any point in aiming my finger.

If the auditors can't heal their own, then Houston, we have a problem.


By discussing tech on a well read public forum, we have witnesses to transparency of tech theory and practice. We give you, gentle readers, choices and insights into how it all really works. If you can differentiate a particular approach that ** might ** help you in an area of your life, then these tappings on keyboards around the world are not in vain.

You can interject, and say, "I don't get this." On Ifachat on yahoo groups, you are just stupid and wrong. Here, you are a co equal creator of this thread. Make it yours. Insist on fun reading and understandable posts.

Carmelo, that's about the best post of yours that I've seen yet! :happydance:
Regarding the tech and COS both needing transparency, truer words were never spoken! Thank YOU! :)
 

Terril park

Sponsor
BB,

there are two important areas to auditing. The written tech questions, commands, and theory.

and

the safety of the auditor and the organization's space. I think it would be safe to say that a PC would open up, allow themselves to view dicey incidents, non physical universe incidents, touchy stuff that a bad auditor or organization could (and would) hurt you with in a safe environ. The contributors to this thread, I would trust with my fragile self. i wouldn't let a current Flag or Freewinds auditor ask me"Do birds fly?"

My statement above is true for when I was at Flag for a week in 1979. I didn't trust them. I had left in 1976 because I didn't trust the guy at the top of the pecking order. Generally speaking, an organization is a macrocosmic view of the person at the top.

As Tatum O'Neill said about her dad, Ryan O'Neill in the movie "Paper Moon," "If he's got scruples, it's damn sure they aren't his."

So to start with, one needs an auditor who will grant you full and total beingness to find what you find.

having done some of this auditing on others, i can tell you that the auditor needs to be huge (as huge or huger than the PC gets - and that is giganimous). And the auditor's space needs to be clean as a whistle.

With all the insanity in the Co$, that auditor is not going to be working for the church.
Next you mention the FPRD, the False Purpose Run Down.

Let's just take that dude in Colorado last week, who is OT 7. He shot an employee several times in the head. Then he shot himself. He was experiencing the furies.

O.J. Simpson (still not a Jew), when he stabbed his ex wife and her boy friend, was experiencing the furies.

The furies are all consuming destruction intentions (with action unleashed)

Over the last thirty years there hasn't been anything in the way of tech that really changed lives like that of the 50s and 60s. It was all dumbed down and made usable for an ever lower bar of auditor ability.

Just like military pilots, who could do extraordinary things in a jet, were chosen for the US Space program, they didn't get to demonstrate the competence in tin cans shot into the atmosphere.

Skills like ITSA and 2 way comm fell out of common use. Muzzled auditing, just the commands (and nothing else), is never going to get you PC fully re creating, in PT, damage laden incidents of a sketchy nature, that they can then view, in a new unit of time, and change their mind about. The PC has to have the space to holographically create anew huge "earthquakes" of theta. A PC can't as is something that they can't fully recreate.

I hope this answers your question.

Not really, but interesting nevertheless. This is not the first time I've
heard auditors comment on declining abilities of 2 way comm.

The FPRD was one of the very best actions I did, going pre-mest universe, and so on. Importantly it was my choice to do it as case action rather than
something enforced. Having read the FPRD issues, I correctly realised they were just the ticket for me. I did it 20 years ago, and a long way from Flag and int management. My auditor was in fact the C/S and she had trained with and interned with an old timer at St. Hill. That time and place, London was quite safe.

What other techniques would you use to handle " furies"?
 

Ted

Gold Meritorious Patron
Not really, but interesting nevertheless. This is not the first time I've
heard auditors comment on declining abilities of 2 way comm.

The FPRD was one of the very best actions I did, going pre-mest universe, and so on. Importantly it was my choice to do it as case action rather than
something enforced. Having read the FPRD issues, I correctly realised they were just the ticket for me. I did it 20 years ago, and a long way from Flag and int management. My auditor was in fact the C/S and she had trained with and interned with an old timer at St. Hill. That time and place, London was quite safe.

What other techniques would you use to handle " furies"?


Here's what Alan wrote: Found on FZAmerica web site.

From: ACW

Oops! nearly missed this one.


>> There is a specific sequence of what must be handled. It is as follows:
>>
>> 1. Locate the area of Fury.
>
> How?
>
> Homer
>
Ask:
Is there an area of FURY.

Where is it.
(causes Being to separate outside area to, see it.)

What is its size?
(causes Being to be bigger than it.)

What is its color?
(causes being to have to inspect closer.)

What is its duration?
(Most important step as Being will have to span its Beginnings to end (sometime into future) (also straighten out time line of area if balled up.)

What are its moods?
(Vital as FURY contains, almost all moods from top to bottom, concentrated into a laser like beam.)

List all moods.

Are there any moods you must not experience?
(These are the out of control moods.)

List ALL unwilling to experience moods.

Take each and run:

>From where could a Godlike Being experience..........(Unwill. mood.)?
>From where could a Godlike Being create..............(same mood.)?
The tell pc : To permeate the FURY. That is holographically be willing to be each particle in event.

Should just disintergrate: Pc should be amazed at quietness or lack of mass in space.

Ask pc: How big are you? Should be huge.

Take break pc may or may not start running consequences of FURY.

If not ask pc:

What has been the consequences of this FURY?

Pc will run later similars to PT. Maybe hundreds of different time lines at once.

All Red Zone conditions will start blowing. Enormous amount of WHY'S for life positioning will blow to view. O/W's will fly to view and run out.

Pc may be un-auditable for several days as life holograms will begin to rise to Green Zone expectancy.

THATS OT PROCESSING!!

Alan W.
 

lkwdblds

Crusader
This seems fantastic to me!

Here's what Alan wrote: Found on FZAmerica web site.

From: ACW

Oops! nearly missed this one.


>> There is a specific sequence of what must be handled. It is as follows:
>>
>> 1. Locate the area of Fury.
>
> How?
>
> Homer
>
Ask:
Is there an area of FURY.

Where is it.
(causes Being to separate outside area to, see it.)

What is its size?
(causes Being to be bigger than it.)

What is its color?
(causes being to have to inspect closer.)

What is its duration?
(Most important step as Being will have to span its Beginnings to end (sometime into future) (also straighten out time line of area if balled up.)

What are its moods?
(Vital as FURY contains, almost all moods from top to bottom, concentrated into a laser like beam.)

List all moods.

Are there any moods you must not experience?
(These are the out of control moods.)

List ALL unwilling to experience moods.

Take each and run:

>From where could a Godlike Being experience..........(Unwill. mood.)?
>From where could a Godlike Being create..............(same mood.)?
The tell pc : To permeate the FURY. That is holographically be willing to be each particle in event.

Should just disintergrate: Pc should be amazed at quietness or lack of mass in space.

Ask pc: How big are you? Should be huge.

Take break pc may or may not start running consequences of FURY.

If not ask pc:

What has been the consequences of this FURY?

Pc will run later similars to PT. Maybe hundreds of different time lines at once.

All Red Zone conditions will start blowing. Enormous amount of WHY'S for life positioning will blow to view. O/W's will fly to view and run out.

Pc may be un-auditable for several days as life holograms will begin to rise to Green Zone expectancy.

THATS OT PROCESSING!!

Alan W.

This just seems fantastic to me! I particularly appreciate the "causes being to ..." explanation after the various commands. I am trained only to Class IV and NED but the purposes for each R3R step were never given in any bulletin which I ever read. Do you know why LRH did not give these simple explanations on any bulletin on the Academy Levels or NED Courses?

One other thing, do you feel it is a good idea for someone who's case is in pretty good shape such as me, to run this process on myself without a meter and just write everything down on paper as I go to give the self auditing session more of a semblance of being a real session? I had everything up to and through NOTS run on me successfully while in C of S plus I did a thorough and fantastic Life Repair and ARC straightwire, then all the standard bridge actions including Power, Power Plus, the R6 End Words Course ane the Clearing Course at AOLA, and then all the "old" OT Levels through OT7 plus I've received over 300 hours of XDN under a Class XII CS, Ron Shaffran done in late 1972 and early 1973 plus I did L11 at Flag twice, 1977 and 1978. My last formal auditing was NOTS at flag in 1991 and again in 1992 plus a thing called the Disagrement Rundown delivered by Denise Mulkey at AOLA in 1993. I had a big blow out win on that and always list Denise as one of the two or three best auditors I have ever had. I paid more fees and flew to Flag for the last time in 1999. I had recently started taking blood pressure medication and Flag turned me away and sent me home due to the meds I was taking.

I'm pretty much persistent Floating Needle day in and day out. Case phenomena do get turned on once in a while, but I can usually spot the charge and blow it by inspection.
Lakey
 

lkwdblds

Crusader
I have a question about your Quote.


Leon, about that quote at the bottom of your posts, I have a question. Basically, the quote is a self evident truth for all those religions who focus heavily on getting everyone in and claiming their route is the only valid route and all other routes lead to damnation. This inclused all branches of Christianityand Islam plus the official Church of Scientology.

For Judiasm, Buddhism, Shinto, Hinduism and other Vedic religions, the truth of the quote is not as readily apparent or obvious to me as being true. Would you care to offer a little clarification in this area?
Lakey
 

Ted

Gold Meritorious Patron
This just seems fantastic to me! I particularly appreciate the "causes being to ..." explanation after the various commands. I am trained only to Class IV and NED but the purposes for each R3R step were never given in any bulletin which I ever read. Do you know why LRH did not give these simple explanations on any bulletin on the Academy Levels or NED Courses?

One other thing, do you feel it is a good idea for someone who's case is in pretty good shape such as me, to run this process on myself without a meter and just write everything down on paper as I go to give the self auditing session more of a semblance of being a real session? I had everything up to and through NOTS run on me successfully while in C of S plus I did a thorough and fantastic Life Repair and ARC straightwire, then all the standard bridge actions including Power, Power Plus, the R6 End Words Course ane the Clearing Course at AOLA, and then all the "old" OT Levels through OT7 plus I've received over 300 hours of XDN under a Class XII CS, Ron Shaffran done in late 1972 and early 1973 plus I did L11 at Flag twice, 1977 and 1978. My last formal auditing was NOTS at flag in 1991 and again in 1992 plus a thing called the Disagrement Rundown delivered by Denise Mulkey at AOLA in 1993. I had a big blow out win on that and always list Denise as one of the two or three best auditors I have ever had. I paid more fees and flew to Flag for the last time in 1999. I had recently started taking blood pressure medication and Flag turned me away and sent me home due to the meds I was taking.

I'm pretty much persistent Floating Needle day in and day out. Case phenomena do get turned on once in a while, but I can usually spot the charge and blow it by inspection.
Lakey


If that is the situation, what do the Furies have to do with you?

Next: A being in the (or a) Fury is totally out of its freakin' rational mind and spirit. The being is outside of time and space and into total, flaming spiritual pissed-offed-ness and destruction. You could, no doubt run locks on locks off on a solo basis, but how you gonna holographically move into the fury without losing yourself and your orientation to the here and now?
 
Not really, but interesting nevertheless. This is not the first time I've
heard auditors comment on declining abilities of 2 way comm.

The FPRD was one of the very best actions I did, going pre-mest universe, and so on. Importantly it was my choice to do it as case action rather than
something enforced. Having read the FPRD issues, I correctly realised they were just the ticket for me. I did it 20 years ago, and a long way from Flag and int management. My auditor was in fact the C/S and she had trained with and interned with an old timer at St. Hill. That time and place, London was quite safe.

What other techniques would you use to handle " furies"?

From: Clearing Archive Roboposter <[email protected]>
Organization: ART MATRIX - LIGHTLINK
Newsgroups: <alt.clearing.technology>
Date: Monday, March 29, 2004 12:13 PM
Subject: furies2.memo



Practices, Practitioners and Clients
Misdirections, Tricks, Denials
and Avoidances,
Connected to "The Furies"


"The Furies" have remained unhandled on all Spiritual Beings'
cases, because they contain huge powerful quantities of disruptive,
destructive psychic forces, charge, pain, fear and anguish, stemming
from violations of the Spiritual Beings' Codes, Virtues, Honesty,
Principles and Integrity.

When a Spiritual Being violates its Codes, Virtues, Honesty,
Principles and Integrity the being feels less worthy of the rewards of
life. Too many violations and the Spiritual Being begins to HATE
itself; the more violations, the deeper and more far reaching the
HATRED OF SELF.

HATRED OF SELF causes a diminishment of self and power. As the
being continues to violate its basic principles of honor, the being
diminishes itself into an ever smaller sphere of influence and has
less and less presence. Should this cycle of diminishment continue
the being will actually disappear. In its place are substitute
compression containers and identities.

This diminishment of the Spiritual Being is the equivalent to
DEATH, VANQUISHMENT and EXTINCTION of the SPIRIT, a very terrifying
cataclysmic event for the being. So much so, the Spiritual Being will
do anything in order to survive and stay in existence.

As the Being cannot find the truth and correct answers to this
terrifying THREAT OF DEATH, VANQUISHMENT and EXTINCTION of the SPIRIT,
the Being will INVENT and CREATE WRONG ANSWERS, WRONG ITEMS and
IMPLEMENT WRONG SOLUTIONS in order to protect and defend itself from
this cataclysmic event.

Blame, shame, guilt, irresponsibility, domination, subjugation,
bitterness, anger, apathy, lying, etc., are all defensive mechanisms
in order to make themselves right and escape the DEATH and EXTINCTION
of the SPIRITUAL BEING.

"The Furies" are just such a defense mechanism. In an attempt to
survive its spiritual VANISHMENT and EXTINCTION, the Being has to
actively and speedily deny its HATRED OF ITSELF. To do this denial
the Being is forced to give up the TRUTH and resort to blaming others
for making them violate their Codes, Virtues, Principles, Honesty and
Integrity.

"The Furies" are a violent attempt to defend self and shift the
blame of violations onto others.

The Being has become a master at misdirection, tricks, denying,
and avoiding what violations preceded "The Fury." TRUTH becomes a
weapon of great THREAT of EXTINCTION for it causes the Being to
approach that which could cause the being to VANISH and become
EXTINCT.

The fact is, one of the effects of dramatizing "The Furies,"
causes the Being to make ALL of their CREATIONS EXTINCT.

The desperate solution to the problem of EXTINCTION, has now
become a much greater, more complex problem.

It is this THREAT OF EXTINCTION that has terrified and scared
away all practices, practitioners and client, from handling "The
Furies."

The problem for the Spiritual Being is not "The Furies," it is
what preceded "The Furies." The HATRED OF SELF and the VIOLATIONS OF
ITS HONOR AND SELF WORTH.

You, therefore, have several areas that MUST BE FULLY HANDLED.

They are as follows:

1. Locate and Handle Violations of Codes, Virtues, Principles,
Honesty and Integrity.

2. Locate and Handle the THREATS OF EXTINCTION.

3. Locate and Handle Massive HATRED OF SELF.

4. Locate and Handle "THE FURY DIRECTED TOWARDS SELF."

5. Locate and Handle the DENIAL OF RESPONSIBILITY, and the
MENTAL SHIFT TO BLAME OTHERS. (The source point to becoming a
VICTIM.)

6. Locate and handle the People, Places, Subjects and Things,
the Being has chosen to BLAME and SHAME.

7. Locate and Handle the Construction of Instruments, Devices
and Machines to automatically enforce this BLAME and SHAME.

8. Locate and Handle the Instruments, Devices and Mechanisms
used to obfuscate these BLAME and SHAME Instruments, Devices and
Machines.

9. Locate and Handle the creating RAGE and FURY to direct at
OTHERS, in order to hide the HATRED OF SELF and to shift the BLAME and
SHAME on to OTHERS.

10. Locate and Handle the justifications and rationalizations to
BLAME and SHAME OTHERS.

11. Locate and Handle all the PSYCHIC CONTAINERS or BOXES, the
Being has implemented to Compressed or Restrained itself.

12. Locate and Handle by continuing the rest of the Super Being
Power Prosperity Procedures.


KINDLY AND GENTLY DOES IT!

It requires an incredibly safe, trustful processing team and
environment to process this technology, as the being is going up
against those areas which the Spiritual Being believes can cause it to
become EXTINCT.

What the Being has not realized is, they are already worse than
EXTINCT, they have become SOMEONE or SOMETHING ELSE.

They have long ago ceased being themselves.

UNTIL THE FURIES ARE FULLY HANDLED, A KIND AND GENTLE APPROACH IS
MANDATORY.

ABUSE keeps the THREAT OF EXTINCTION forever present. This
forces the Being to become defensive which accesses them into the
distrustful, distant, cold, angryness of chronic RIGHTNESS, not the
warm, trusting, close, friendliness and purity of TRUTH.


ALAN C. WALTER

8 March 1996 Copyright 1996 Alan C. Walter ALL RIGHTS
RESERVED

______________________________________________________________________
21st Century New Public Series 20
 

lkwdblds

Crusader
Thanks to Ted and Carmelo

Thanks to Ted for answering - I guess I better not try to run anything that powerful on myself, it appears it would be very unwise to do this. I'm not trained properly and have done no set ups and would probably just mess up my case bigtime.

Carmelo - Thank you for posting Alan's long bulletin. The whole area is new to me, the post reads well and is easily assimilated. It looks as if the Furies are sort of a Second Wall of Fire to confront. It seems as if confronting all that would produce many more and deeper gains than LRH's wall of fire. The Ep seems to be what OT8 is supposed to be about, actually returning to being oneself. I have a vague concept in my mind of what that would be like.

Have any people actually attempted and / or completed this level through Alan's or other related delivery facilities?
Lakey
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top