Great Story, Dudins.
From what I understand, you were around between 1974 and 1984. That was a time of a lot of upheaval in the Church.
What did you know about Mary Sue's arrest and imprisonment?
Did you notice any changes on the finance lines while the Feds were closing in in the late 1970's?
Were you there for the monthly rising prices?
Thanks Alanzo...see I finally got the spelling right...
Actually between the time that I joined the EPF and when I left the states
(1975 to 1980) there was a great deal of change on finance lines. Two things:
In the SO we were not getting our information from the press. They were the bad guys....We recieved information on Mary Sue and other major events on a need to know basis and usually in breifings from great guys like Heber Jentzch. "They" were always wrong and the word from LRH's office was always gospel. So, the prospective I got on the Mary Sue issue was propaganda in nature, to say the least.
Re Finances, there you have hit a sore spot. I worked on the creation of and implementation of finance systems that were implemented in the US, EU, UK and elsewhere by the CMO.
This was a top priority, Hot program in the period from 1978-80. Perhaps because the Feds were moving in wanting accountability for the money. I would have recieved PR bullshit for the most part on this. But LRH was directing it himself and his intentions were clear. It was important to him.
They were called the "staff pay systems" in the US to make it sound like the concern was to get staff pay increased and living conditions improved. This was the front. The system took the splititng up of the pie out of the hands of the org execs and secured a substantial percentage going uplines whether or not the org could afford it. In some orgs, the GO oversaw the distribution of funds. Staff Pay was also percentage based and in order to make more staff pay, staff would have to make more money.
Bottom line: The idea was, if you
take the money,,,,,they will make more money. I WAS INDOCRINATED WITH THIS.
Every proposal I wrote with a guy by the name of Brian Slevin was checked by the Commodore and many of the rejections had comments in his hand writing. He did not turn it over this project to his aides until he was happy with it.
I was sent on the missions to implement it. I was such a push over.....I truly believed that what LRH said would happen, would happen. When orgs started to suffer financially, the COs, or EDs were targeted as having CI. It got ugly.
At the org end, this would eventually result in rising the rising prices you speak of.
By that time I was on a mission taking over FOLO Latin America. Sippin Margaritas en la Zona Rosa. (joke)
But there is so much more to remember. For example, I still have trouble recalling alot of what occurred when I was Finance Officer at FOLO under Bill Franks. Eventually it will come back. That was a tough time for me.
Please note that the above is from my side of the sit. There may be others out there that were at the CMO end that would know more about this and how it came down at that end.
I hope this answers some of your question.