What's new

The Little Thread Which Grew - the Apollo '73 to Everything But

Status
Not open for further replies.

RogerB

Crusader
Great rant, Face! Luvvvved it!

Ted, great topic and posts on this you started Mate. I just caught up here.

One thing I would say that a lot of folks may not know is that what constitutes the entry level courses have much changed over the years, both by name and content.

In the '50's and early 60's we used to have an Intro Personal Efficiency Course/Lecture, a Communication Course, later to be called a HAS Course (and visa versa) . . . this was simple TRs 0-4 . . . though when I did my version of it in '57 it was a combo of PE with TRs 0-9.

By about 1961-2 the line up was PE Intro lecture (free) Comm Course (TRs 0-4) HQS TRs 0-9 plus some objectives and some light subjectives like ARC S/W. Later somewhere along the line HQS Course got back into doing some Diantetics . . . and so it went.

When I ran the public divisions in London 1976-8, (edit --it was 1967 not 76) I did the Intro lecture 3 nights a week . . . . routinely filled with 40 attendees mainly sent in by my FSMs I'd personally hatted/trained.

This was followed by a Comm Course (TRs 0-4)

Face is quite right, the key to success on these entry level services is personal attention that ensures folks get wins. I did the weekend Comm Course, and coached the guy who did the evening course . . . the key to the success here was proper guiding and supervising of students so they were guided to success . . . . nothing worse than a newbie having to read and do and wondering WTF???? They flounder.

By 1970 the KSW mania had kicked in. Having someone do a live, verbal presentation/lecture as a PE or Intro lecture was OUT . . . . verbal tech man!!! Now you had the poor schnook sit down and watch a boring meaningless film of LRH blabbering on! No longer could the Comm Course super help the student . . . he could only run the no-verbal tech shit on him.

I had the highest Pub Div stats in the world in late '67-'68. This got crushed as noted elsewhere by the first SO mission that hit GOWW at that time.

My observation over the years is that it is almost as though the SO types look for whatever successful actions are that are going on and then devise a way to say its wrong and crash it. Quite astounding to watch. HCO, I have found have only been obstructionist or destructive.

It's the classic "not invented here" syndrome.

edit on the date . . . I transposed a digit.

R
 
Last edited:

Ted

Gold Meritorious Patron
Great rant, Face! Luvvvved it!

Ted, great topic and posts on this you started Mate. I just caught up here.

One thing I would say that a lot of folks may not know is that what constitutes the entry level courses have much changed over the years, both by name and content.

In the '50's and early 60's we used to have an Intro Personal Efficiency Course/Lecture, a Communication Course, later to be called a HAS Course (and visa versa) . . . this was simple TRs 0-4 . . . though when I did my version of it in '57 it was a combo of PE with TRs 0-9.

By about 1961-2 the line up was PE Intro lecture (free) Comm Course (TRs 0-4) HQS TRs 0-9 plus some objectives and some light subjectives like ARC S/W. Later somewhere along the line HQS Course got back into doing some Diantetics . . . and so it went.

When I ran the public divisions in London 1976-8, I did the Intro lecture 3 nights a week . . . . routinely filled with 40 attendees mainly sent in by my FSMs I'd personally hatted/trained.

This was followed by a Comm Course (TRs 0-4)

Face is quite right, the key to success on these entry level services is personal attention that ensures folks get wins. I did the weekend Comm Course, and coached the guy who did the evening course . . . the key to the success here was proper guiding and supervising of students so they were guided to success . . . . nothing worse than a newbie having to read and do and wondering WTF???? They flounder.

By 1970 the KSW mania had kicked in. Having someone do a live, verbal presentation/lecture as a PE or Intro lecture was OUT . . . . verbal tech man!!! Now you had the poor schnook sit down and watch a boring meaningless film of LRH blabbering on! No longer could the Comm Course super help the student . . . he could only run the no-verbal tech shit on him.

I had the highest Pub Div stats in the world in late '67-'68. This got crushed as noted elsewhere by the first SO mission that hit GOWW at that time.

My observation over the years is that it is almost as though the SO types look for whatever successful actions are that are going on and then devise a way to say its wrong and crash it. Quite astounding to watch. HCO, I have found have only been obstructionist or destructive.

It's the classic "not invented here" syndrome.

R


Facey, I have bookmarked your rant so's I can find it later. Will be commenting as you might expect. :D

Rog, around 1977 I was tasked with educating some of the HGC pc's who were not quite making it as expected. In hindsight, I can say these were the pc's who simply did not fit the bridge mold. They had their own perceptions of case and they needed to be programmed not to go "up" a bridge, but to find their own bridge and walk it.

Nevertheless, I ran a Personal Efficiency Course five nights a week for a while. The course had new folks and others. In the limited time I ran it I graduated nearly 80 students and lost only two.

The PL on Tech Degrades was my license to "give verbal data." The refs on the PE Course were still valid. Somebody had to do it! The students had no mass, no live communication on the subjects, no reality, no connection. I connected them. The original PE Course was said to be 20 or 21 evenings. I reduced it to 5 covering more than one subject a night. On the nights I discussed engrams and secondaries I had many in the class in tears, even some who had their dianetics and one fellow who had done the L's at Flag.

Safe space. Understanding. Voice of experience.

The C/S dropped in to hear what I was saying. The ED dropped by. Had the para-military people seen what was going on they would have shit a brick then thrown it at me. I in turn would have thrown the calve's brain at them before the fight broke out. I can fire off tech and policy refs with the best of them.

But this course was again scientology-centric. It had little to do with the pc/student's own needs or wants. Again, guiding the students to success -- success in their own estimation -- is key to any training or auditing success.
 

afaceinthecrowd

Gold Meritorious Patron
Great rant, Face! Luvvvved it!

Ted, great topic and posts on this you started Mate. I just caught up here.

One thing I would say that a lot of folks may not know is that what constitutes the entry level courses have much changed over the years, both by name and content.

In the '50's and early 60's we used to have an Intro Personal Efficiency Course/Lecture, a Communication Course, later to be called a HAS Course (and visa versa) . . . this was simple TRs 0-4 . . . though when I did my version of it in '57 it was a combo of PE with TRs 0-9.

By about 1961-2 the line up was PE Intro lecture (free) Comm Course (TRs 0-4) HQS TRs 0-9 plus some objectives and some light subjectives like ARC S/W. Later somewhere along the line HQS Course got back into doing some Diantetics . . . and so it went.

When I ran the public divisions in London 1976-8, I did the Intro lecture 3 nights a week . . . . routinely filled with 40 attendees mainly sent in by my FSMs I'd personally hatted/trained.

This was followed by a Comm Course (TRs 0-4)

Face is quite right, the key to success on these entry level services is personal attention that ensures folks get wins. I did the weekend Comm Course, and coached the guy who did the evening course . . . the key to the success here was proper guiding and supervising of students so they were guided to success . . . . nothing worse than a newbie having to read and do and wondering WTF???? They flounder.

By 1970 the KSW mania had kicked in. Having someone do a live, verbal presentation/lecture as a PE or Intro lecture was OUT . . . . verbal tech man!!! Now you had the poor schnook sit down and watch a boring meaningless film of LRH blabbering on! No longer could the Comm Course super help the student . . . he could only run the no-verbal tech shit on him.
I had the highest Pub Div stats in the world in late '67-'68. This got crushed as noted elsewhere by the first SO mission that hit GOWW at that time.

My observation over the years is that it is almost as though the SO types look for whatever successful actions are that are going on and then devise a way to say its wrong and crash it. Quite astounding to watch. HCO, I have found have only been obstructionist or destructive.

It's the classic "not invented here" syndrome.

R

:thumbsup::thumbsup::thumbsup:

That's one of the things I got incessant shit for—in the 70’s I went to a live lecture in the Org (along with the film).

I also had the Basic Course Sups focus on 2WC and “helping" the Newbie as much as we could get away with. The Sups all knew to “mind their KSW P’s" and Q’s whenever anyone else but me stepped in the course room. Wow, I just got off a long-term Missed MW/H! Thanks, Rog...I'm gonna go to the Examiner and write a Success Story.:coolwink:

Face:)
 

Ted

Gold Meritorious Patron
:thumbsup::thumbsup::thumbsup:

That's one of the things I got incessant shit for—in the 70’s I went to a live lecture in the Org (along with the film).

I also had the Basic Course Sups focus on 2WC and “helping" the Newbie as much as we could get away with. The Sups all knew to “mind their KSW P’s and Q’s whenever anyone else but me stepped in the course room. Wow, I just got off a long-term Missed MW/H! Thanks, Rog...I'm gonna go to the Examiner and write a Success Story.:coolwink:

Face:)


"Your needle is floating," but who the fuck cares what a meter says. :dieslaughing:

When I was supervising courses I would get everyone started on targets, get the co-audits rolling, then spend the rest of the evening just hanging out. I would be looking for those subtle indicators that told me the student wanted to ask a question or say something. Seemingly like magic, I would be standing by the student right when they wanted to say, "Hey! I just realized..."

Pink sheets? Are you kidding me? Word clearing? Just enough, no big word chains. Demo kits? Sure, if you like. Whatever it takes to get you through the evening and bring you back the next day. The key sup tech is 2-wc.

If there is no excitement in the course room, no one in their right mind would want to be there night after night.
 

Veda

Sponsor
Mary had little comment re class VIII, other than she did it under LRH.
Try this.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=he8Fw3EuTRY

That's no description of the Class VIII course at all.

Mary is a very nice person but is unable to tolerate examining (beyond a brief glance) the darker regions of Scientology, placed there by Hubbard according to his long range plan, so she's likely to never fully understand Scientology.

As for KRC and ARC, these comprise the Scientology symbol http://www.bittenandbound.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/11/scientology_symbol_logo.jpg and reflect Aleister Cowley's "Love is the Law; Love under Will."

"Will" is senior.

For those curious, Crowley explains what is meant by "love" in a booklet titled "Little Essays Towards Truth," and his "Love" sounds a lot like Hubbard's "ARC."

Both "Love" and "ARC" are subordinate to "Control" and to "Will."

Some actual descriptive accounts from two who were there: http://www.forum.exscn.net/showpost.php?p=479233&postcount=48
 

Ted

Gold Meritorious Patron
That's no description of the Class VIII course at all.

Mary is a very nice person but is unable to tolerate examining (beyond a brief glance) the darker regions of Scientology, placed there by Hubbard, according to his long range plan, so she's likely to never fully understand Scientology.

As for KRC and ARC, these comprise the Scientology symbol http://www.bittenandbound.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/11/scientology_symbol_logo.jpg and reflect Aleister Cowley's "Love is the Law; Love under Will."

"Will" is senior.

For those curious, Crowley explains what is meant by "love" in a booklet titled "Little Essays Towards Truth," and his "Love" sounds a lot like Hubbard's "ARC."

Both "Love" and "ARC" are subordinate to "Control" and to "Will."


That's the MEST side of the "game." Domination. It makes "will" a deception, an evil intent.

For the rest of us, ARC precedes control. When ARC precedes control, love and compassion dominate. Granting of beingness and free will are possible.

But... Whatever floats your boat. It's just a philosophical perspective, isn't it?

:coolwink:
 

Veda

Sponsor
-snip-

But... Whatever floats your boat. It's just a philosophical perspective, isn't it?

:coolwink:

It's not my boat. It's the publicised/secretive doctrine of Scientology as designed by its founder.

Describing it helps others understand it, and possibly free themselves from its truth/trickery glue-mix.

That "ARC precedes control" means little, except that it, ultimately, leads the person into a place where control can be asserted.

Scientology is a bait and switch and begins with "ARC."

But where does it lead?
 

Enthetan

Master of Disaster
Minus fun and games, there was no reason to stay on lines unless you had bought into the idea of Clear and OT. Me, I wanted to see if it was bullshit or what? So I stayed around having fun and meeting new folks.

In hindsight I can see that forcing, demanding, or otherwise directing people to scientology's perceived path to its perceived enlightenment and ability was rather organizational narcissistic of itself. We have the answers. Only we know the route, etc.

A good reg would find out what the person's interests, problems, difficulties, concerns, etc. were and suggest a course or auditing would help them to address that. If auditing was the solution, the info arrived at the DofP, C/S, and auditor. We delivered a lot of Life Repairs. That is still some of the most enjoyable and effective auditing I have ever done. It addressed what the pc really wanted to handle. Programs were individualized. Even if the Life Repair did not address the difficulty in its entirety, the Life Repair at least took the edge off much to the pc's pleasure.

As I recall, the student was treated differently. He just arrived on course. Why? Sometimes you would find out in two-way communication, sometimes not.

I suspect that as long as the organization and the student/pc's participation in it is helping the student/pc to achieve goals, purposes, overcome difficulties, etc. the student/pc will stay with it. When the organization's self-importance parallels the student/pc's needs-wants, the student/pc will stay with it. When there is no longer a meeting of the minds, the student/pc no longer perceives the need to invest his time, energy, effort, and money.

Some years ago I worked in the career search management industry. Clients were brought in for a specific reason. We trained them. We consulted them into new, mo' betta' career positions. Even with this controlled and agreed target, there were some, a small percentage, who did not stick.

What do people want today? Mo' money, good sex, better relationships,... What are they upset about? Same stuff. Same as 1970. I think it would be easier for me today to keep people on track, :thumbsup: but that would be a track of their lives, not the track of the bridge and scientology's self-importance.
:no:

A very important point: "I think it would be easier for me today to keep people on track, :thumbsup: but that would be a track of their lives, not the track of the bridge and scientology's self-importance.
:no:"

People enter Scientology to get something fixed in their lives. They are generally not on board with "clear the planet or die trying". When the org violates their reason for being there, most leave. When they are not PERSONALLY winning, they move on to something else.
 

Enthetan

Master of Disaster
The indoc line in the ‘60’s and ‘70’s made auditors and appealed to “techies”, “hands on” pioneer types. Over the years the line was changed to make PC’s and appeal to “culties”, wannabees and “status seeker” types.

A whole bunch of good stuff that was done by folks like Enid Vien, in places like Adams Avenue, was torn to tatters by the predatory El Ron KSW hit squad culture of the SO.

Face:)

When I first came in, in the 70's, my attitude was "There's something here that creates interesting effects. Let's see where it goes". Where they stopped focusing on making auditors in favor of PCs, they eventually ran out of auditors who could actually audit.
 

Enthetan

Master of Disaster
My observation over the years is that it is almost as though the SO types look for whatever successful actions are that are going on and then devise a way to say its wrong and crash it. Quite astounding to watch. HCO, I have found have only been obstructionist or destructive.

It's the classic "not invented here" syndrome.

You put your finger on the essence, Rog, as usual.

In the SO, following in the example of LRH, brilliance MUST ONLY FLOW FROM THE TOP DOWN. Senior management gets very threatened by the idea that somebody down below might be better at actually making things go right than senior management does.

It's very threatening to insecure types, particularly people who got into management by being superior at screaming and threatening people into getting into line, rather than by having any superior ability to produce real products.
 
Great rant, Face! Luvvvved it!

Ted, great topic and posts on this you started Mate. I just caught up here.

One thing I would say that a lot of folks may not know is that what constitutes the entry level courses have much changed over the years, both by name and content.

In the '50's and early 60's we used to have an Intro Personal Efficiency Course/Lecture, a Communication Course, later to be called a HAS Course (and visa versa) . . . this was simple TRs 0-4 . . . though when I did my version of it in '57 it was a combo of PE with TRs 0-9.

By about 1961-2 the line up was PE Intro lecture (free) Comm Course (TRs 0-4) HQS TRs 0-9 plus some objectives and some light subjectives like ARC S/W. Later somewhere along the line HQS Course got back into doing some Diantetics . . . and so it went.

When I ran the public divisions in London 1976-8, (edit --it was 1967 not 76) I did the Intro lecture 3 nights a week . . . . routinely filled with 40 attendees mainly sent in by my FSMs I'd personally hatted/trained.

This was followed by a Comm Course (TRs 0-4)

Face is quite right, the key to success on these entry level services is personal attention that ensures folks get wins. I did the weekend Comm Course, and coached the guy who did the evening course . . . the key to the success here was proper guiding and supervising of students so they were guided to success . . . . nothing worse than a newbie having to read and do and wondering WTF???? They flounder.

By 1970 the KSW mania had kicked in. Having someone do a live, verbal presentation/lecture as a PE or Intro lecture was OUT . . . . verbal tech man!!! Now you had the poor schnook sit down and watch a boring meaningless film of LRH blabbering on! No longer could the Comm Course super help the student . . . he could only run the no-verbal tech shit on him.

I had the highest Pub Div stats in the world in late '67-'68. This got crushed as noted elsewhere by the first SO mission that hit GOWW at that time.

My observation over the years is that it is almost as though the SO types look for whatever successful actions are that are going on and then devise a way to say its wrong and crash it. Quite astounding to watch. HCO, I have found have only been obstructionist or destructive.

It's the classic "not invented here" syndrome.

edit on the date . . . I transposed a digit.

R

It was all to get people in control and into a cult. Good intentions helped to get more in. Good intentions was and is one of the ingredients in the bait.
 

afaceinthecrowd

Gold Meritorious Patron
You put your finger on the essence, Rog, as usual.

In the SO, following in the example of LRH, brilliance MUST ONLY FLOW FROM THE TOP DOWN. Senior management gets very threatened by the idea that somebody down below might be better at actually making things go right than senior management does.

It's very threatening to insecure types, particularly people who got into management by being superior at screaming and threatening people into getting into line, rather than by having any superior ability to produce real products.

:yes::thumbsup: Yep! :thumbsup::yes:

Face:)
 
from Road and Track magazine

True Stories Behind Car Company Logos
Find out why Ferraris prance, Chevys wear a bowtie and much more.

By Nick Kurczewski

Did a wallpaper pattern in a Paris hotel room inspire the famous Chevrolet Bowtie emblem? Does the blue and white BMW roundel really symbolize a propeller and sky? And was the Porsche logo first sketched on a napkin in a New York City restaurant? In the world of automobile logos, truth can be stranger than fiction—though a good story can go a long way toward embellishing a brand’s corporate identity.

From Ferrari’s Prancing Horse to Cadillac’s crest, automobile logos appear on everything from steering wheel hubs to giant billboards, and even the lapel pins on the suits of company executives. This kind of flexibility is one of the design elements needed for an effective and strong logo, says Jack Gernsheimer, Creative Director of Partners Design Inc. and author of Designing Logos: The Process of Creating Symbols that Endure.

With over 40 years of advertising experience and more than 500 logos to his credit, Mr. Gernsheimer believes it’s essential to look long-term and to keep things simple when designing a logo. “Not getting too trendy with the type or color” is vital, he says. “When you design a logo, ideally it should endure for decades.” For many automakers, the roots of their logos stretch back over a century and contain enough symbolism and intrigue to fill a Dan Brown novel.

Automotive Pioneers

Tragedy plays a role in a popular myth surrounding the famous intertwined double-R logo of British luxury automaker Rolls-Royce. The company’s founders, Sir Henry Royce and Charles Stewart Rolls, originally used red lettering for the emblem that combined the first initial of their last names. Legend has it the color was changed, from red to black, in a mark of respect after the death of Sir Henry Royce in 1933. In reality, black lettering was simply considered more becoming of a prestigious luxury car. The timing of the color change was pure chance.

Rolls Royce’s second iconic emblem, the Spirit of Ecstasy hood ornament, is linked to a similarly tragic (but in this case, entirely true) tale. Designed by Charles Sykes in 1911, the model for the emblem was Miss Eleanor Thornton, the personal secretary of John Scott Montagu, the 2nd Baron Montagu of Beaulieu and friend of company co-founder Charles Stewart Rolls. In 1915, Miss Thornton died at sea while traveling to India. Yet for almost 100 years her likeness has graced every Spirit of Ecstasy.

The origins of some automotive logos begin even before the dawn of the automobile. The Mercedes-Benz three-pointed star is commonly known to symbolize the use of the company’s engines on land, sea and air. But the star first appeared on a personal note written in 1872 from company founder, Gottlieb Daimler, to his wife. Mr. Daimler used a three-pointed star to mark the location of his family’s new home in the town of Deutz, Germany. His sons adapted the emblem as the Mercedes-Benz logo from 1910 onward.


One of the best known emblems of all time, Ferrari’s Prancing Horse first appeared on warplanes flown by Francesco Baracca, an aviator and hero of World War I. In 1923, Enzo Ferrari met Francesco’s parents after a race, where they suggested Ferrari use their son’s prancing horse badge on his race cars—both for good luck, and as an homage to Francesco, who died before the war ended. A yellow background was added (it’s the official color of Enzo Ferrari’s hometown of Modena, Italy) and the horse’s tail was redesigned to point upward.


In the case of BMW, myth (and savvy marketing) has fooled generations into linking the company’s logo with an aviation theme. “A German advertising agency in the 1920s produced an ad that showed the [BMW] roundel against the spinning propeller of an airplane to reflect the company’s origins as an aircraft engine manufacturer,” says Dave Buchko, company spokesman for BMW North America. “That, it seems now, turns out to be urban myth.” While it’s true that BMW manufactured airplane engines, the blue and white logo represented the colors of the Bavarian flag, not a stylized propeller and sky.

American Ingenuity

Had it not been for a talkative spouse, the Chevy Bowtie emblem could have claimed one the strangest design origins. Louis Chevrolet said the famous emblem was inspired by a wallpaper pattern in his hotel room during a visit to Paris in 1908. The story would have been considered fact, had it not been for Mr. Chevrolet’s wife. She later said her husband had seen an advertisement featuring a similarly shaped logo in a Sunday supplement. Eye-catching design—and careful evolution—is a theme found in many American car company logos.

The Cadillac crest is the coat of arms of French military commander and explorer, Antoine de la Mothe Cadillac, who founded Detroit in 1701. Simplified and streamlined over the years, the basic style remains intact. “It’s so distinctive, you don’t want to give that away,” says Anne Marie Webb, Design Manager for GM’s Global Brand Identity. When updating one of GM’s brand logos, Webb says she always considers elements “that made it recognizable and strong.” Even then, cultural differences must be considered. The Buick Tri-Shield emblem is monochromatic in every country except China, where the logo maintains red, blue and grey coloring. “They felt [color] had a more premium feel,” explains Webb.

Changing times can also bring big changes in a logo. For more than 80 years, Chrysler has used a wide range of badges featuring ribbon seals, or ribbon seals with wings. But in 1962, Chrysler Chairman Lynn Townsend wanted a more modern and less fussy corporate logo. According to Chrysler’s archives, out of approximately 700 designs, Townsend selected the Pentastar. Many assumed the design symbolized the five divisions of the company (circa the early 1960s). It didn’t; the design simply looked good.

Lawyers, Latin and Luck

Some car company logos owe their existence to legalities and economies of scale. In 1909, having left the company bearing his name, August Horch established a second automobile company in Zwickau, Germany. But with his name already in use, Horch had a serious problem. He couldn’t legally name his new company after himself. However, when translated into Latin, "Horch"—which means "hark"—became the lawyer-friendly "Audi." The four interlinked Audi rings came about in 1932, when four struggling automakers joined together under the corporate banner of Auto Union. These companies included Audi, DKW, Wanderer and, ironically, the original Horch.

Volvo also has Latin roots. Meaning “I roll,” the name was taken from a brand of ball bearings before it was applied to the Swedish automaker in 1924. The Volvo logo is the Roman symbol for iron—symbolizing a warrior’s shield and spear. The diagonal streak across the grille was originally only a mounting point for the badge, but is now “almost as much a brand ID as our iron symbol,” says Daniel Johnston, Product Communications Manager at Volvo Cars North America.

Good luck—and an easier to pronounce name—played a role in the creation of the Toyota nameplate in 1936. In the book Toyota: A History of the First 50 Years, company founder Kiichiro Toyoda “ran a contest for suggestions for a new Toyoda logo. There were over 20,000 entries. The winning entry consisted of katakana characters in a design that imparted a sense of speed… “Toyoda” became “Toyota” because as a design it was esthetically superior and because the number of strokes needed to write it was eight, which in Japan is a felicitous number, suggestive of increasing prosperity.”

Statues, Stars, and Smart Cars

Inspiration for a name and logo can come from careful consumer research, legal loopholes or, in some cases, by looking at the surrounding environment. The Maserati brothers took inspiration for their company’s trident logo from the statue of Neptune in the central square of Bologna, Italy, where Maserati was originally headquartered. The trident with Maserati script below was sketched by Mario, an artist, who also happened to be the only Maserati brother never actively involved in the design or engineering of cars.

Inspiration for the Subaru name literally came from the heavens—or more precisely, the Japanese name of a star cluster in the Taurus constellation. Six of the stars are visible to the naked eye and—in keeping with corporate identity—this matches the six companies which combined to form Fuji Heavy Industries, Subaru’s parent company. The Hyundai name has an even simpler explanation. In Korean it means “modern,” while the company’s logo is a stylized “H” that also represents two people, the company and customer, shaking hands.

The Smart name seems to speak for itself, no translation needed. It actually happens to be an acronym of Swatch (the Swiss watch company that was a partner during the early stages of the company), Mercedes (the brand’s current custodian), and “Art.” The company’s logo signifies compact, with a “C,” and forward thinking with an arrow emblem.

Plot Twists

When it comes to the origin of an iconic logo, the same car company can sometimes have two variations of the same story. That holds true with Porsche, and the truth behind the German sports car manufacturer’s eye-catching emblem. According to a spokesperson with Porsche Cars North America, an extremely influential automobile distributor, Max Hoffman, met with Ferry Porsche in a New York City restaurant in 1951. The discussion moved on to Hoffman’s belief that Porsche needed a powerful logo, something distinctive and elegant. A rough sketch was made then and there, on a dinner napkin.

Yet the story from Porsche Germany differs from this colorful explanation. Max Hoffman did ask Ferry Porsche for a logo, but the emblem was designed by Porsche engineer Franz Xaver Reimspiess—and most definitely not sketched on a napkin somewhere in Manhattan. Does it matter who is right or wrong? Probably not.

A tall tale never hurts, especially when it involves two companies known for building some of the most exotic cars in the world. Car enthusiasts love to stoke the rivalry between Lamborghini and Ferrari, even down to the minutiae of the Lamborghini logo. The design of the gold and black emblem was led by company founder Ferruccio Lamborghini, and the bull located in the center stands for his astrological sign (Taurus). Legend has it that Mr. Lamborghini purposefully copied the Ferrari shield, then reversed that company’s yellow and black color scheme to prod the ego of Enzo Ferrari.

With the key protagonists having passed away, there is probably no way to know for certain how much of this is true. “To our knowledge, this is just a rumor,” said a spokesperson for Automobili Lamborghini S.p.A. “The only way to confirm would have been to ask Mr. Lamborghini himself.”
 

Leon

Gold Meritorious Patron
And you cannot ever confront the fact that many thousands of people all over the world had a lot of fun in Scientology and had huge wins and successes with it. To the degree that you do not confront this you will never fully understand what Scientology really is and what wonderful results it can bring about.

An ethical person uses the best of what is available for the best of his fellows. An unethical person sees only harm and blackness. Fun is evil to such a person. Fun is delusion. It must be stopped because it is really evil.
 

Leon

Gold Meritorious Patron
Where did the quote disappear to?

Veda, that was for you in response to your earlier post.
 
Skeletons, dirt — it's the election's homestretch


AP – FILE - In this Sept. 23, 2010 file photo, Nevada Republican Senate candidate Senate Sharron Angle acknowledges …

By LIZ SIDOTI, AP National Political Writer – Mon Oct 4, 8:02 pm ET

WASHINGTON – Leaked audio in Nevada reveals a Republican Senate candidate trashing her party. Video of a Democratic Senate hopeful wrongly claiming he served in Vietnam becomes a TV ad in Connecticut. A housekeeper steps forward to say her employer, California's GOP gubernatorial nominee, knew she was an illegal immigrant.

Digging for dirt, political foes are working overtime to surprise rivals with skeletons and other embarrassments, forcing them to defend themselves rather than focus on their closing arguments in the homestretch of critical midterm elections.

Control of Congress and of statehouses nationwide is at stake on Nov. 2, and — behind the scenes or sometimes in plain sight — both Republicans seeking power and Democrats looking to retain it are laboring to unearth and highlight stains in opposing candidates' backgrounds. Both sides are using the material to question candidates' character and trustworthiness, important issues with voters who are already sour on politicians in general.

In one of the latest episodes, GOP Senate nominee Sharron Angle in Nevada was recorded criticizing Washington Republicans in a conversation with tea party hopeful Scott Ashjian, whose third-party candidacy threatens to siphon votes from her and help Senate Democratic leader Harry Reid win re-election.

"The Republicans have lost their standards, they've lost their principles ... really that's why the machine in the Republican Party is fighting against me. They have never really gone along with lower taxes and less government," Angle said, according to a recording that reached the Las Vegas Sun.
Could "skeletons in the closet" sway your vote in the election homestretch?

Reid's campaign used that to claim "Angle will say or do anything to get elected."

That incident followed a political bombshell that shook the California governor's race last week.

GOP nominee Meg Whitman was forced to answer for employing an illegal immigrant for nine years when the Mexican maid — and her attorney, longtime Democratic supporter Gloria Allred of Los Angeles — stepped forward to claim that Whitman had known about her status since 2003. Whitman disputed that and dismissed the allegations as a baseless stunt engineered by Democratic opponent Jerry Brown.

Could tea party candidates push Congress and the nation too far to the right?

"Jerry, you should be ashamed," Whitman told Brown in a weekend debate. "You and your surrogates ... put her deportation at risk. You put it out there and you should be ashamed for sacrificing Nicky Diaz on the altar of your political ambitions."

Brown, in turn, accused Whitman of refusing to take responsibility: "You have blamed her, blamed me, blamed the left, blamed the unions. But you don't take accountability."

In Connecticut, Republican Linda McMahon rolled out a TV ad on Monday that showed a 2008 clip of Democratic Senate nominee Richard Blumenthal's now-discredited comment about "the days that I served in Vietnam." The controversy surfaced in the spring, putting a chink in the Democrat's campaign in what some strategists called the opening salvo in the opposition-research wars. The ad takes it to the next level, asking: "If he lied about Vietnam, what else is he lying about?"

McMahon, the former World Wrestling Entertainment executive, also is finding herself the target of an unflattering disclosure: media reports of a contract involving her wrestling empire teaming with the company that produces the "Girls Gone Wild" videos and promoting a 2003 "uncensored" pay-per-view spring break special.

There's almost surely more to come.
"Some of these stories, if they check out and if they get legs they can really affect how people vote. In close races, opposition research can make a difference," said Mike Gehrke, who spent several election cycles as a Democratic opposition researcher.

But opposition research can backfire of simply fall flat.
"There are so many different channels for it now — TV ads, web videos, e-mail, blogs, radio, direct mail. The message can become so fractured that people tune it out," said Kevin Madden, a Republican communications operative. "It has to be potent."

Political operatives on both sides compile reams of information on candidates' personal backgrounds and professional records. Divorce files and housing documents are mined. Video appearances and audio recordings are collected. Rumors of wrongdoing are chased down.

Politically damaging disclosures eventually are leaked by allies to local media outlets or posted without fingerprints on the Internet, giving candidates plausible deniability so voters don't hold them accountable for negative campaigning. In many cases, the information finds its way into TV ads in a campaign's final weeks.

Timing is important: Plant information too early and voters may forget about it, too late and they may not learn about it before heading to the polls.
And so, with four weeks until Election Day, the disclosures and allegations pile higher.

House Democrats are contending that eight Republican hopefuls around the country "with disturbing backgrounds and legal problems" were recruited and endorsed by House GOP leaders. A news release asks: "Did Republican leaders know — or just not care — about their Republican recruits' lies, harassment of women, lawsuits, tax cheating, assault and altogether negligent behavior?"

One of those candidates, Tom Ganley in Ohio, is having to respond to a lawsuit filed by a 39-year-old Cleveland woman who says he propositioned and groped her in 2009 after she tried to volunteer for his campaign. Ganley denies the accusations, and his lawyer contends there's a political motive.
In New Jersey's 3rd Congressional District, a new TV ad by Democratic Rep. John Adler accuses GOP challenger John Runyan of trying to call his massive house a farm. Says the ad: "Runyan bought one donkey to get a $20,000 tax break by saying he lives on a farm. Luckily he was caught."
 
Racial predatory loans fueled U.S. housing crisis: study

On Monday October 4, 2010, 12:17 am EDT
By Nick Carey

CHICAGO (Reuters) - Predatory lending aimed at racially segregated minority neighborhoods led to mass foreclosures that fueled the U.S. housing crisis, according to a new study published in the American Sociological Review.

Predatory lending typically refers to loans that carry unreasonable fees, interest rates and payment requirements.

Poorer minority areas became a focus of these practices in the 1990s with the growth of mortgage-backed securities, which enabled lenders to pool low- and high-risk loans to sell on the secondary market, Professor Douglas Massey of the Woodrow Wilson School of Public and International Affairs at Princeton University and PhD candidate Jacob Rugh, said in their study.

The financial institutions likely to be found in minority areas tended to be predatory -- pawn shops, payday lenders and check cashing services that "charge high fees and usurious rates of interest," they said in the study.

"By definition, segregation creates minority dominant neighborhoods, which, given the legacy of redlining and institutional discrimination, continue to be underserved by mainstream financial institutions," the study says.

Redlining is the practice of denying or increasing the cost of services, such as banking and insurance, to residents in specific areas, often based on race.

The U.S. economy is still struggling with the effects of its longest recession since the 1930s, which was triggered in large part by the housing crisis, which was in part triggered by the crash of the subprime loan market.

Subprime lending refers to loans made to consumers with poor credit and others considered higher risk. They tend to have a higher interest rate than traditional loans.

The study, which used data from the 100 largest U.S. metropolitan areas, found that living in a predominantly African-American area, and to a lesser extent Hispanic area, were "powerful predictors of foreclosures" in the nation.

Even African-Americans with similar credit profiles and down-payment ratios to white borrowers were more likely to receive subprime loans, according to the study.

"As a result, from 1993 to 2000, the share of subprime mortgages going to households in minority neighborhoods rose from 2 to 18 percent," Massey and Rugh said.

They said the U.S. Civil Rights Act should be amended to create mechanisms that would uncover discrimination and penalize those who discriminated against minority borrowers.

The study is published in the October issue of the journal.
 

Ted

Gold Meritorious Patron
The Dalai Lama Says...

And you cannot ever confront the fact that many thousands of people all over the world had a lot of fun in Scientology and had huge wins and successes with it. To the degree that you do not confront this you will never fully understand what Scientology really is and what wonderful results it can bring about.

An ethical person uses the best of what is available for the best of his fellows. An unethical person sees only harm and blackness. Fun is evil to such a person. Fun is delusion. It must be stopped because it is really evil.


Dalai Lama: "Ultimately, humanity is one, and this small planet is our only home. If we are to protect this home of ours, each of us needs to feel a vivid sense of universal altruism. It is only this feeling that can remove the self-centered motives that cause people to deceive and misuse one another. If you have a sincere and open heart, you naturally feel self-worth and confidence, and there is no need to be fearful of others."

:)
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top