Thanks for the comments Roger. I'm not sure I know how to send something back. I'm so used to trying to take responsibility for every thought and manifestation I find in my space that I right away modify most things I find unconfrontable. I'd have to spot and undo the modifications in order to see it as originated. These would have to be perceivable in one's space. I suppose you could either approach it as dispelling a curse as in someone's designs for you, or returning a portion of the interloper back to him. Maybe if the intentions were impressed with quite some umph, you could locate a cluster that has been impressed with that idea or outcome or desire for you.
Oh, Oh! This looks like a bit of work for Roger
There will be a lot of info here, so bear with me and, maybe, read it all through (even a couple of time) and then align the pieces.
Hats, in red above: “
I'm not sure I know how to send something back.”
Hats, the mechanics of doing it are actually the same as for sending them a thought, concept or vision of
yours. The only difference is that, it is their thing you are sending back, not a thing you’ve created to then send to them. (More on this later herein)
You wrote: “I'm so used to trying to take responsibility for every thought and manifestation I find in my space that I right away modify most things I find unconfrontable.”
There is a big distinction and difference between “taking responsibility” for something and: assuming ownership or, considering oneself stuck with it or, considering one
has to
do anything with it or,
accepting it and thus getting stuck with it. I could go on and list out all the things one can erroneously do with stuff sent to one for which one could say one is “taking responsibility for” . . . . but I think you get the idea, and I invite you to take a look at these distinctions

and deal with these things in the way that is best for you
And on this trick of yours of: “right away modify most things I find unconfrontable.” Well, Hubbard called that “alter-isness” and pointed out that “alter-isness” is one of the two actions we do that causes things to persist :wink2:
Perfect duplication is said to “cause things to vanish” . . . . well, I find that to be so
if I choose to have such things cease to exist; but equally, I find I can cause things to continue if I choose that as the follow on action after perfect duplication.
So, what is
perfect duplication? I can tell it is
not having or getting things
here that were created or emanated at some other location; or “there.” At a minimum that would occasion alteration as to spatial location.
The first thing to say about this term “duplication” that we’ve grown used to, is that it really is a wrong word to be using in the way $cn uses it. The dictionary defines it as a “copy” or replication. And while that can often happen in the regular course of action between Beings; it is not what
perfect duplication is as the concept I am explaining here.
“Perfect duplication” is getting what is created as it is created at the exact location from which it is sourced by the exact who. This, in actuality requires one exercise the ability to be aware of the exact who and aware at the exact location at the exact moment of the creation of the thing and that one is fully aware of the wholeness of the creation . . . that is, one is aware of the amount of energy, mass, life-force involved in the thing; the mood level in which it was created, the concepts/intentions it contains or conveys, and the duration it was created to exist for. (and there’s probably some other items I’ve missed listing here at the moment, but you get the idea).
In other words, one is aware of it and gets it, as-is, at the instant of its causation and at its exact location and instant of creation. And the trick then, is that one can leave it there with the creator . . . one does not have to transpose it to being here and thus, then, suffer it here.
I wrote earlier on this thread that we intrinsically have infinite presence, and that we intrinsically are capable of being aware of all of it or also anywhere within it. And I can assure you we are capable of being aware at the location/position of those we are connected to, and aware of what they are creating/emanating as they do so.
Of course, that level of operating would be operating at a masterful level and with omni-responsibility, omni-awareness.
Lower down on the scales of existence one tends to operate at positions separate to, detached from and, even spiritually disconnected from others if such relationship is in rough enough shape.
But even at the quite usual level of operation being separate to most Beings, one would, per force, be introducing the alterations to the creations of others needed to induce their hang-up . . . and this simply due to the alteration of location of existence of the creation from its point of origin to its point of “receipt.” And to this typically gets added other alterations such as (mis)ownership, opinions about it, attempts to solve or otherwise alter it, counter it and etc.
Even so, there is a process Alan W developed to handle all these things

It’s called “AGREEMENT & FALSE REALITIES TELEPATHICALLY PROJECTED IMAGERY HANDLING PROCESS.” There is also a R/D designed to handle untoward and unwanted hung up imagery extant between you and your Spiritual Teammates (STMs). It’s call the “AGREEMENT HANDLING PROCESS.”
I attach below the Agreements and False Reality Handling. Edit I tried, but it exceeds the size limit for its file type. I'll make it my next post.
You’ll note the parts of it . . . the things the R/D causes you to do (and in an exact sequence). None of this tech exists anywhere else that I’m aware of. It is a colossal breakthrough piece of tech. And of course, totally missed by Hubbard and not in his stuff.
Hatshepsut; said:
I had begun wondering if each time a person has a psychic tantrum and wishes happenings on you..do they emit enough life force to create a small theta body. I would think not. I would hope not.
You know, you don’t need to stay connected to nasties who want to run shit on you . . . you can either change the game, or take you attention off of them and let them be in their own stew. There is a lot of good stuff, good Beings you can relate with instead
Hatshepsut; said:
But you know what I realized. Those of us who are
not inside 'one' dominant valence, who
are exterior to any fixed mind often leave the inside open. The inside of our space is left vacant. Most humans have a central core to the body. A lot of things stick to it. If you have blown yours you probably look hollow to those who would insert something into the space. It's like an atom recognizing that another needs one of its electrons. It's programmed to comply. I have seen with my own eyes how someone with plus packages cand 'send' one to compensate for another's lack of such. I shit you not.
I have mentioned it before . . . Alan’s book: “Gods in Disguise.”
What you are describing appears to me, based on what I get from you description, is covered in the tech dealing with the earlier spiritual Universes or, as I prefer to refer to them, the earlier spiritual Domains of Existence. The “Valuable Creations Universe” is also referred to as “The Cores.” It is a DNA-like construct designed to forward persistence and self replicate. It is a basic to the Physical Universe. And the joker in the pack is that, from one’s own perspective, all of this stuff is within one’s own Being . . . though one can also consider one is within “it” as we do with the physical universe (when in fact, it’s within you as an infinite Beingness).
My view is, of course, that one does not have to be on auto effect of or auto inflow of stuff from others or their automaticities. But, I will say, that to the degree one is afraid of these types of things is to the degree one is departing and absenting one’s power to handle and prevent these unwanteds. Fear tends to make one absent, and into such absence (or vacuum) others will tend to dump shit

Hatshepsut; said:
Sometimes this game can get worse than at other times. There was a time when doing Level III solo that I noticed my blows were being replenished. This caused me no small amount of apathy. In my space was a mocked up pvc pipe with elbow joint. It looked like those contraptions in a chicken coop. The eggs get laid by the hen up on the top shelf and roll down into a catcher. I was being reloaded with somnabulent beings just as fast as I cleaned my space. So the core was what was sticky.

. . . Well, we are in a position to undo all mechanics and automaticities—they are, after all, simply telepathically (spiritually) projected imagery constructs . . . your own or others. If interest still, you could look to see if indeed these “replenishment” types were truly new to you, or were they old companions “awakening to get into the game.” Either way, I earlier gave you the info for restoring all such connections to harmonious relationships or, if they choose, handled so they can go their own independent way.
Hatshepsut; said:
I think its a secret that we humans don't let ourselves in on. If we see someone without the astral core (glue) in the center of their composite we try to create one for them. It's not done consciously. But that this is happening I am sure.

I've actually had to date/locate one contribution. One, believe it or not came via body fluid containing some particles of LSD stored in (wherever) from yrs earlier. It actually latched into my core somewhere in the vacinity of my uterus and grew to be the whole size of the interior of my body. It was flat, made of an astral like fluid, translucent yellowish green, and highly electronic. I was not born with this. That is something I would love to send back. Only I got it when it was an embryo so I can't send it back as it was created. Tragically I'm thinking of those little water monkeys that you put into a fish bowl and then they grow up to the shape designed. You would not believe how much review auditing I used up trying to handle psychic stuff. I was sure everything I needed was at the bottom of that black bag of tech tricks to use on me. But no...ya come up with this shit and you just earn yourself and FES.
Well, what ever is still there to handle that you want to handle, the attached is the R/D to do it with.
Hatshepsut; said:
I love this little occult deviation we've taken on this thread. The things no one usually talks about. The elephant in the room.
Yes, well, it is rather a piece of omitted tech. Probably because most folks have little or no confront on the subject . . . and that, because, not having workable answers they simply had to flee, deny or otherwise occlude the issue.
But, the other side of the coin is, if you love the occult stuff so much . . . who am I to suggest you should “solve it?”
Hatshepsut; said:
Thanks Sweetness for the Mary Baker Eddy snippets.
Thanks PFFINC (Is that private first class in North Carolina or some such?)
Thanks Ted for the tip about getting it As is at the moment of creation.
Later on, probably on my other “Corrections to the Tech” thread, I’ll post my research and notes to Alan on the actuality of the true anatomy of communication and its formula (Hubbard missed the target on that one). Alan embraced my thing, but released it on his lines as his (without any mention I’d given it to him) I’ll reveal the whole scene when I do get to it.
It is germane to what all this post has been about.
RogerB