Innominate Dude
No Longer Around
I'll ack your answer and repeat the Extreme Ruds Line Auditing Question:
That's pretty much how it comes across.
Unfortunately, "rights" are an artificial social construct. They are not natural laws arising from the nature of existence. Succinctly put, rights can be denied by:
NEVER SOCIALLY CONSTRUCTING THEM IN THE FIRST PLACE
- Mormons created a right for MEN to marry many wives, but not correlate right of WOMEN to take many husbands. Meanwhile the rest of US society constructed and maintained a right of a wife to not have to share a husband. Either the Mormons were denying the wife a right to exclusive husband and wife status, or the mainstream was denying a right exclusive to males of marrying more than one woman.
FINDING EXEMPTIONS FROM THEM IN CERTAIN CIRCUMSTANCES
- We of the Church believe all men have the right to express their views and hear the views of others.
(So long as you are not dumb enough to actually try this on a viewpoint unpopular with the current Ethics Officer's biases.)
BY LAPSE OF INTEREST OR MEMORY
It is a long cherished right of any Englishman to cry "Harold!" Too few people remember or care about this to treat it as a real existing right in the modern era.
SIMPLY FLOUTING THEM DEFIANTLY OR AS A DARE
- dialogue from The Last Picture Show:
Sheriff's Deputy: I don't know nuthin' about your const'tional raits, all I know is you better come along with me.
The Church of Scientology loves that last method a lot, but still it practices never having created certain rights and finding massive reasons, within its world view, for exemptions from them in various circumstances and also simply forgetting about them at times.
But why are examples of this so crucial to you, except as an auditing question as though you are some Extreme Ruds Line Auditor trying to put us in session???
