David C Gibbons
Ex-Scientology Peon
Folks,
I take the point an ESMB member made about going to the IRS and lodging a complaint per their process. Still, I instead felt inspired to write to my congressman. His response follows:
-------------------------
May 22, 2015
David Gibbons
XXXXXX
XXXXX
Dear David Gibbons:
Thank you for contacting me regarding the Church of Scientology's tax-exempt status. I appreciate you taking the time to share your concerns with me.
The tax-exempt status of the Church of Scientology has been a controversial issue for nearly 50 years, when the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) revoked the entity’s tax exemption in 1967 because its activities were determined to be commercial and operated for the benefit of individuals, not the public. After a number of lawsuits and legal challenges to regain its tax-exempt status, the IRS recognized the church as a tax-exempt nonprofit organization in 1993. To date, questions remain as to how and why the church's status was reinstated.
Recently, a documentary aired that reignited calls to the IRS to investigate the church and reexamine its nonprofit status. Moreover, a petition on Whitehouse.gov calling for the revocation of the church's tax-exempt status has been started. While I have not yet seen the documentary, I'm troubled by what I have read.
To obtain and maintain tax-exempt status under the Internal Revenue Code Section 501(c)(3), an organization, including churches, must be organized and operated exclusively for charitable, religious, educational, and other purposes for public, not private, benefit. I don't believe that Congress should be defining what is, and what is not, a religion, though I do believe that we should evaluate federal tax laws governing tax-exempt organizations and the enforcement of those laws to ensure that nonprofits are meeting their charitable, religious, and educational purposes. Based on what is being reported about the church and its activities, it appears that an IRS review of the organization would be justifiable.
Again, thank you for sharing your thoughts with me. Please continue to contact me on all issues of importance to you and our district.
Sincerely,
MIKE THOMPSON
Member of Congress
MT:mr
-------------------
Certainly this is not a thundering call to dismember Scientology, but I was pleasantly surprised to see that the congressman's office has some sense of the history of Scientology and it's relationship to the government. I feel my letter to him was a worthwhile effort.
I take the point an ESMB member made about going to the IRS and lodging a complaint per their process. Still, I instead felt inspired to write to my congressman. His response follows:
-------------------------
May 22, 2015
David Gibbons
XXXXXX
XXXXX
Dear David Gibbons:
Thank you for contacting me regarding the Church of Scientology's tax-exempt status. I appreciate you taking the time to share your concerns with me.
The tax-exempt status of the Church of Scientology has been a controversial issue for nearly 50 years, when the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) revoked the entity’s tax exemption in 1967 because its activities were determined to be commercial and operated for the benefit of individuals, not the public. After a number of lawsuits and legal challenges to regain its tax-exempt status, the IRS recognized the church as a tax-exempt nonprofit organization in 1993. To date, questions remain as to how and why the church's status was reinstated.
Recently, a documentary aired that reignited calls to the IRS to investigate the church and reexamine its nonprofit status. Moreover, a petition on Whitehouse.gov calling for the revocation of the church's tax-exempt status has been started. While I have not yet seen the documentary, I'm troubled by what I have read.
To obtain and maintain tax-exempt status under the Internal Revenue Code Section 501(c)(3), an organization, including churches, must be organized and operated exclusively for charitable, religious, educational, and other purposes for public, not private, benefit. I don't believe that Congress should be defining what is, and what is not, a religion, though I do believe that we should evaluate federal tax laws governing tax-exempt organizations and the enforcement of those laws to ensure that nonprofits are meeting their charitable, religious, and educational purposes. Based on what is being reported about the church and its activities, it appears that an IRS review of the organization would be justifiable.
Again, thank you for sharing your thoughts with me. Please continue to contact me on all issues of importance to you and our district.
Sincerely,
MIKE THOMPSON
Member of Congress
MT:mr
-------------------
Certainly this is not a thundering call to dismember Scientology, but I was pleasantly surprised to see that the congressman's office has some sense of the history of Scientology and it's relationship to the government. I feel my letter to him was a worthwhile effort.