George Layton
Silver Meritorious Patron
..
Here's an interesting bit of archival trivia. . .
Once upon a time, it was highly unfashionable (considered "mean" by some) to post anything critical about Marty Rathbun. That's quite understandable, actually, considering that he was leading a kick-ass whistleblowing crusade (it seemed) against the COS (Crimewave of Scientology).
However, even though he was exposing all kinds of disgraceful secrets of the cult, there was always a very toxic thread that ran though the life and times (and posts) of Commander Rathbun:
--For example, he was very big indeed on censoring trashing anyone who disagreed with him--and even banning readers/comments that questioned his infallibility on all things Scientology.
--For example, despite having left the COS, Rathbun was still a "loyal officer" and "KSW" Scientologist who promoted the lunacy of Clear, OT, Xenu and other super-human clownery. No crime there, but it was telling that his (supposed) rapier-sharp analytical mind was fully unable to "rise above" Hubbard's incessant lying and absurd claims of "miraculous" OT powers.
--For example, Rathbun was not content with simply banning those with opinions other than his own (quite Hubbard-like, ain't it? lol), he felt compelled to "dead agent" them with vitriolic character assassination. That's when he reverted to the maturity of an adolescent schoolyard bully with taunts and name calling (in a Scientology way) where he would fire off a volley of Scientological "curses" like "1.1" (SP), "low toned"(SP), "hater" (SP) and "punk" (joking & degrading SP that "besmirches the good name of L. Ron Hubbard").
Well, all rambling & ranting aside, let's get to the point of this post, shall we? LOL.
I am reposting something from "THE STUPID THREAD" from 6.5 years ago (January 2011) that did not receive even one comment. Not a LOL, not a "LIKE", not even a "WTF?". LOL.
78 months later, how times have changed. All those early-stage bizarre "volcanic eruptions" by Rathbun are now far more comprehensible, taken in context of Rathbun's fully erratic behavior in the past year. In other words, there were blaring "clues" of what was to come, if only anyone cared to look.
Jeez, will anyone just acknowledge me so I can stop ranting and post the damn thing already? LOL
So, anyways, now it's 2017 and I am still asking myself. What exactly was Rathbun's original "postulate" that he is having so many "wins" on these days? He seems quite "VGIs" and "uptone "about all this vicious Fair Gaming he has been doing of late.
What does it all mean?
Where is the clue?
Unless he is the "hater" and "1.1" that he has breathlessly been warning about all these years. . .that might explain it.
(quite Hubbard-like, ain't it? lol),





