Type4_PTS
Diamond Invictus SP
@Emma
Here is my response to your last post about Jeffrey's email (including the parts of my post you responded to):
Maybe you were mistaken?
You didn't go back and check after I accused you of lying?
And yes, all of his financials were laid bare. And you know what? Alanzo is the one who's actions made that information public by choosing to file for bankruptcy.
As I had written in my original post,
"Public disclosure is the price one pays for going bankrupt in America and getting rid of their debts."
Yeah, I saw that as well. But see no evidence that that was suggested by either Roger or Jeffrey, however you left others to believe that that was the case.
What you could have done when you saw people making reference to Alanzo's financial status was moderate their posts, deleting any reference to his finances, and privately warning them to not to it again.
Instead, you let it go on with no moderation, and both you and Alanzo took action to draw maximum attention to it. And then you published a private email from Roger without his permission which essentially confirmed that Alanzo filed for bankruptcy.
Yeah, I guess not. But who did make the cut?
You had written this:
"...two people confirmed and forwarded the email to me. A LOT of people got that email"
Who is the second person who confirmed and forwarded that email to you?
And who are the "LOT" of people who got it?
If someone who represented themselves as a critic ran a CoS campaign against ME for years, I would also begin to look into the background of the person doing it. And many others would as well.
It doesn't seem though that you have a problem with smearing. You've allowed Alanzo to do it on ESMB against others for almost two months now.
You only have a problem with it when Alanzo is the target.
Why is that?
If someone handed him an envelope full of OSA cash do you believe Alanzo would have reported it to the bankruptcy court to go on his public record?
I would exercise great caution if I were you when listening to Alanzo's stories.
He has demonstrated time and again that he doesn't allow the facts to get in the way of a great story.
Sending a private confidential email to a friend which includes a public domain document is not "fair game".
But maybe to characterize it as such and reporting on ESMB as you did is fair game. Here's your quote about it:
"If you saw the email you'd puke. It's as nasty as anything OSA have ever done."
I understand that you are more than likely unfamiliar with how the bankruptcy process works here in the U.S., and the implications that that has for the one filing (making their financials public). But Alanzo IS familiar with it as he filed for it, yet he did nothing to correct your portrayal of it.
And yet, both of you are screaming that HE has been fair gamed. Once again, Alanzo is the one who made his financials public, by filing for bankruptcy. If that's fair game than he fair gamed himself.
Seriously? Even if what you were saying was true, he could have had someone else post it online for him.
But he didn't. He exercised discretion by not doing so.
Here is my response to your last post about Jeffrey's email (including the parts of my post you responded to):
Maybe you were mistaken?
You didn't go back and check after I accused you of lying?
And yes, all of his financials were laid bare. And you know what? Alanzo is the one who's actions made that information public by choosing to file for bankruptcy.
As I had written in my original post,
"Public disclosure is the price one pays for going bankrupt in America and getting rid of their debts."
Yeah, I saw that as well. But see no evidence that that was suggested by either Roger or Jeffrey, however you left others to believe that that was the case.
What you could have done when you saw people making reference to Alanzo's financial status was moderate their posts, deleting any reference to his finances, and privately warning them to not to it again.
Instead, you let it go on with no moderation, and both you and Alanzo took action to draw maximum attention to it. And then you published a private email from Roger without his permission which essentially confirmed that Alanzo filed for bankruptcy.
Yeah, I guess not. But who did make the cut?
You had written this:
"...two people confirmed and forwarded the email to me. A LOT of people got that email"
Who is the second person who confirmed and forwarded that email to you?
And who are the "LOT" of people who got it?
If someone who represented themselves as a critic ran a CoS campaign against ME for years, I would also begin to look into the background of the person doing it. And many others would as well.
It doesn't seem though that you have a problem with smearing. You've allowed Alanzo to do it on ESMB against others for almost two months now.
You only have a problem with it when Alanzo is the target.
Why is that?
If someone handed him an envelope full of OSA cash do you believe Alanzo would have reported it to the bankruptcy court to go on his public record?
I would exercise great caution if I were you when listening to Alanzo's stories.
He has demonstrated time and again that he doesn't allow the facts to get in the way of a great story.
Sending a private confidential email to a friend which includes a public domain document is not "fair game".
But maybe to characterize it as such and reporting on ESMB as you did is fair game. Here's your quote about it:
"If you saw the email you'd puke. It's as nasty as anything OSA have ever done."
I understand that you are more than likely unfamiliar with how the bankruptcy process works here in the U.S., and the implications that that has for the one filing (making their financials public). But Alanzo IS familiar with it as he filed for it, yet he did nothing to correct your portrayal of it.
And yet, both of you are screaming that HE has been fair gamed. Once again, Alanzo is the one who made his financials public, by filing for bankruptcy. If that's fair game than he fair gamed himself.
Seriously? Even if what you were saying was true, he could have had someone else post it online for him.
But he didn't. He exercised discretion by not doing so.