What's new

The Little Thread Which Grew - the Apollo '73 to Everything But

Status
Not open for further replies.
apollo.jpg

________________________Oooops. Now how'd this get on this thread..

Looks like the "lil' brother" of my old training ship, TS Golden Bear, aka SS Del Orleans, aka USS Crescent City.

3267430109_9e0cbb5ab7.jpg



http://www.csum.edu/About/GoldenBear2.asp

http://cruiselinehistory.com/?p=1416

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/USS_Crescent_City_(APA-21)


Mark A. Baker
 
Mark,

I was prepping for a session with a client last night and came across this reference by Alan W. in his "Ascension Series 32" titled "Chart of Ascension States."

On writing about Ascension State Eight: Full Paradigm Games Matrix Completion, he wrote:



There is more . . . but I type too slow :D

Basically, the matrices we have created are the "mold or form" (check the full definition of Matrix) in which the later GPMs and "games" were formed and developed.

Realize Alan and I are talking about own goals problem masses here: not that other spooky implant stuff Hubbard foisted off on us.

The earlier matrices developed and were formed as a result of the efforts and counter-efforts (spiritual life-force direction/application/use), decisions and solutions involved in handling relationships and games and the wanted and unwanted experiences therein.

This applied life-force variously hung up, forming the containment force-field that is the matrix that then determines or influences the goals and counter-forces within it.

Rog

Thanks for the additional data and yes I totally understand the distinction between own gpms vs "implants". I've only the two books by Alan, but I'll take another look at Paradigm Matrix in light of what you've written.

Thanks again, Rog.


Mark A. Baker
 
Hopefully this shows me and old schoolfriend on our trip down route 66.

http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FreezoneOrg/photos/album/1763662133/pic/1541618219/view?picmode=&mode=tn&order=ordinal&start=1&count=20&dir=asc[img][/QUOTE]

Isn't the point of yahoogroups to restrict content to group members, BB?

If you want it public I think you will have to post it elsewhere.


Mark A. Baker
 

afaceinthecrowd

Gold Meritorious Patron
Trivia Time

Along Route 66, in a the little town of Bartlesville, Oklahoma is the "Price Tower"...the only skyscraper by Frank Lloyd Wright. The terrain is so flat and desolate and the town so small you can see the tower for miles, standing lonely and incongruent up out of the brushy plains.

Face:)
 
Last edited:

Ted

Gold Meritorious Patron
Along Route 66, in a the little town of Bartlesville on the Oklahoma, is the "Price Tower"...the only skyscraper by Frank Lloyd Wright. The terrain is so flat and desolate and the town so small you can see the tower for miles, standing lonely and incongruent up out of the brushy plains.

Face:)


http://www.google.com/imgres?imgurl=http://www.artificeimages.com/gbc/images/cid_aj1514_b.jpg&imgrefurl=http://www.greatbuildings.com/cgi-bin/additional_image_viewer.cgi%3F1512&h=602&w=884&sz=105&tbnid=TZGn3FwN7zRYdM:&tbnh=99&tbnw=146&prev=/images%3Fq%3Dprice%2Btower%2Bfrank%2Blloyd%2Bwright&zoom=1&q=price+tower+frank+lloyd+wright&usg=__FZ3sMRLgWwhWml66c3ezZPQRl9g=&sa=X&ei=gL-KTLWIDoO8lQe-87XACw&ved=0CCAQ9QEwBA


Interesting. Frank Lloyd Wright often designed for the surrounding area where the building would be situated.
 
These are my and friends pictures and we can do what we wilt
with them.

Problem is I'm a computer dummy. :(

This is true. However, when you put them on a RESTRICTED site, then access to them becomes restricted. If you want access not to be restricted, then YOU must place them on an UNrestricted site.


Mark A. Baker
 
Hopefully this shows me and old schoolfriend on our trip down route 66.

http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FreezoneOrg/photos/album/1763662133/pic/1541618219/view?picmode=&mode=tn&order=ordinal&start=1&count=20&dir=ascimg][/QUOTE]

BB,
Is this what you are trying to show?

[IMG]http://www.forum.exscn.net/picture.php?albumid=43&pictureid=871
 
WOW!!

I've never heard of this. It seems like a very important document.

Many in the " Standard tech" FZ are doing this on and after clear and OT and getting greast results.

I have the materials that Val Stansfield has including a handwritten set of
"buttons" by John Mac.

Standard Tech is getting corrupted by free thought. Who'd a thunk?
 
WOW!!

I've never heard of this. It seems like a very important document.

Many in the " Standard tech" FZ are doing this on and after clear and OT and getting greast results.

I have the materials that Val Stansfield has including a handwritten set of
"buttons" by John Mac.

After these Freezone Standard Techers finish power, they should run R6EW




R6-EW Quads Commands

Instructions: You ask the question, such as Flow 1:
"What has another caused me to dramatize?"

1. The answer to that question should be noted down. This can be a short description of behavior, inclination or sensation.
2. Then find the End-word that fits the dramatization.
A few possible EWs can be written down (up to six or so) and then you check them. The correct EW will read 2 1/2 to 3 inches at sensitivity 5. They will probably read when thought of, or when writing it down or repeating it. You are looking for an End-word that makes sense in the context and makes you feel it's complete. Repeat EWs aloud if they seem right but no good read.

If still no read, use Buttons "suppressed" and "challenged". If it is a Button that produces the fall that is a valid read on the EW.

You now find the opposite to that End-word. Here the Antonym Dictionary should be consulted unless the antonym pops up right away. Sometimes the EW with the prefix UN- will be the right one. (EW: Happiness. Opposite: Un-happiness. EW: Boyishness. Opposite: Un-boyishness).

Quote: "Using a standard antonym dictionary, find the opposite or antonym to the first word.
This should read well also, make sense to you, and feel complete. This is the second or opposite End-word and must also be a noun or converted to a nounal word."

Now locate another End-word which describes the same dramatization.
Then you find its opposite. Both should read well (F, LF, LFBD or F/N), make sense, and feel complete.

Repeat the procedure, finding Pairs of End-words, until you run out of End-words for that first dramatization.

Then ask the original question again, "What has another caused me to dramatize?"

You just need an ability to perceive an existing state, condition, emotion, feeling, sensation, inability or lack of emotion, feeling or sensation. That is how the dramatization usually manifests itself in session.
Make good use of the dictionary and a special dictionary of synonyms and antonyms.

The whole message here is to continue to find End-words until a dramatization is flat.

Write down all your session actions, including End-words and Meter reads, on your session worksheets.

Tendency to quit or blow is caused by (1) past R6 errors, (2) dramatization of missed End-words, (3) failure to locate an End-word one is dramatizing, (4) failure to get large reads, (5) also the Bank itself dictates a cessation of action.

Never go to a new Pair before finding both End-words in the old Pair.
When the session begins, run it. When it ends, end it.

Commands

R6-EW F1:
"What has another caused me to dramatize?"
"What would oppose that?"


R6-EW F2:
"What have I caused another to dramatize?"
"What would oppose that?"


R6-EW F3:
"What are others dramatizing to others?"
"What would oppose that?"

R6-EW F0:
"What have I caused myself to dramatize?"
"What would oppose that?"

Each command is independently run.

Each is done exactly the way the first flow was done. Full End Phenomena is obtained on each of these before the next flow is done. To complete one flow may take one or many sessions. Just keep at it for maximum gain.



© Prometheus International, 2004. Plus fair use quotes from Ron Hubbard's published notes and works. Procedure first published by Ron Hubbard. Procedures can't be copyrighted.
 

FoTi

Crusader
After these Freezone Standard Techers finish power, they should run R6EW




R6-EW Quads Commands

Instructions: You ask the question, such as Flow 1:
"What has another caused me to dramatize?"

1. The answer to that question should be noted down. This can be a short description of behavior, inclination or sensation.
2. Then find the End-word that fits the dramatization.
A few possible EWs can be written down (up to six or so) and then you check them. The correct EW will read 2 1/2 to 3 inches at sensitivity 5. They will probably read when thought of, or when writing it down or repeating it. You are looking for an End-word that makes sense in the context and makes you feel it's complete. Repeat EWs aloud if they seem right but no good read.

If still no read, use Buttons "suppressed" and "challenged". If it is a Button that produces the fall that is a valid read on the EW.

You now find the opposite to that End-word. Here the Antonym Dictionary should be consulted unless the antonym pops up right away. Sometimes the EW with the prefix UN- will be the right one. (EW: Happiness. Opposite: Un-happiness. EW: Boyishness. Opposite: Un-boyishness).

Quote: "Using a standard antonym dictionary, find the opposite or antonym to the first word.
This should read well also, make sense to you, and feel complete. This is the second or opposite End-word and must also be a noun or converted to a nounal word."

Now locate another End-word which describes the same dramatization.
Then you find its opposite. Both should read well (F, LF, LFBD or F/N), make sense, and feel complete.

Repeat the procedure, finding Pairs of End-words, until you run out of End-words for that first dramatization.

Then ask the original question again, "What has another caused me to dramatize?"

You just need an ability to perceive an existing state, condition, emotion, feeling, sensation, inability or lack of emotion, feeling or sensation. That is how the dramatization usually manifests itself in session.
Make good use of the dictionary and a special dictionary of synonyms and antonyms.

The whole message here is to continue to find End-words until a dramatization is flat.

Write down all your session actions, including End-words and Meter reads, on your session worksheets.

Tendency to quit or blow is caused by (1) past R6 errors, (2) dramatization of missed End-words, (3) failure to locate an End-word one is dramatizing, (4) failure to get large reads, (5) also the Bank itself dictates a cessation of action.

Never go to a new Pair before finding both End-words in the old Pair.
When the session begins, run it. When it ends, end it.

Commands

R6-EW F1:
"What has another caused me to dramatize?"
"What would oppose that?"


R6-EW F2:
"What have I caused another to dramatize?"
"What would oppose that?"


R6-EW F3:
"What are others dramatizing to others?"
"What would oppose that?"

R6-EW F0:
"What have I caused myself to dramatize?"
"What would oppose that?"

Each command is independently run.

Each is done exactly the way the first flow was done. Full End Phenomena is obtained on each of these before the next flow is done. To complete one flow may take one or many sessions. Just keep at it for maximum gain.



© Prometheus International, 2004. Plus fair use quotes from Ron Hubbard's published notes and works. Procedure first published by Ron Hubbard. Procedures can't be copyrighted.

Thanks for this Carmelo. Is this what people go Clear on if they don't go Clear on Dianetics, per the Grade Chart?
 

Ted

Gold Meritorious Patron
Thanks for this Carmelo. Is this what people go Clear on if they don't go Clear on Dianetics, per the Grade Chart?


Grade V = Power

Grade Va = Power Plus

Grade VI = R6 End Words

Grade VII = Clearing Course

So it went in days of yore.
 

thetanic

Gold Meritorious Patron
Thanks for this Carmelo. Is this what people go Clear on if they don't go Clear on Dianetics, per the Grade Chart?

Well, it's after Power and before the Clearing Course. It's cool stuff, actually, kind of like a deeper Grade IV in some ways.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top