freethinker
Sponsor
You're going to have to work on your people skills because you don't have any.Bullshit.
You have a passive-aggressive point to everything you write lately.
Did I answer your fucking questions?
You're going to have to work on your people skills because you don't have any.Bullshit.
You have a passive-aggressive point to everything you write lately.
Did I answer your fucking questions?
Do you have to walk around with a light on when you think? It's really dark in there.You mean characterizing how I would react to the question "How are you?" at a cocktail party?
Why should I be the least bit polite to you if you are not polite to me?
Answer: I don't have to be.
That almost made me laugh out loud because this is all you do.Out Ethics! You're back!
Dude! Are you going to spam the whole fucking board again?
Okay. When I wrote the letter to Amy Scobee, the group members were identifying as Independent Scientologists. That is not to say their group wasn't peppered with corporate Scientologists or whatever other denominations or splinter groups. I haven't really followed the discussions about Rathbun's and Rinder's progressions and "progressions" out or "out." As far as I can tell, most of the people I was writing to Amy about haven't broken rank with each other. None of them have corrected their unified false messaging on the SP doctrine, which is mainly what I find relevant.Don't think anyone in question identifies as "Independents."
That was years ago.
It's understandable that Gerry would have issues with Rinder.
IMO, Alanzo is using both you and Gerry, which I think is a shame, as both of you are heroes and much respected and loved.
Seriously though, I'd like to understand your concern better. Thank you for your kind regards.No to answer for Veda, but my perception of things:I don't know what to make of your last sentence above. I don't understand how it could be that Gerry and I have been disadvantaged by what Alanzo wrote or clicked on. I have so far resisted what I call the social media "human emotion and reaction" system, but I admit I got a bit of a kick out of all the money bags.Seriously though, I'd like to understand your concern better. Thank you for your kind regards.
You do realize that you continually write the wrong screen name for your under the radar friend @Out Ethics, right?
There are 2 accounts:
@Out-Ethics, and your friend @Out Ethics who came here just a couple years ago.
Really!I would really like to see this fixed on both boards if possible @Emma and @PirateAndBum, it's confusing and unfair on @Out-Ethics who has been here since 2009.
![]()
Really!
Oh fuck, I thought it was the same person!![]()
That would work.I could always rename "Out Ethics" to "Out Effix". I just might do that.
My vote is Out Spamming.I could always rename "Out Ethics" to "Out Effix". I just might do that.
Did you ban him to make the board safe for Alanzo and Red Valiant?I could always rename "Out Ethics" to "Out Effix". I just might do that.
You win. Out Spamming it is.My vote is Out Spamming.
He's not banned. He seems to come & go.Did you ban him to make the board safe for Alanzo and Red Valiant?
What happened to the "free speech" that was supposed to characterize the final days of ESMB?
Why didn't you put the term "banned" underneath his avatar as usual?
He apparently was last night once the board came back up.He's not banned. He seems to come & go.
A guy who literally spams the entire board, trying to destroy it, and you're supporting him.Did you ban him to make the board safe for Alanzo and Red Valiant?
What happened to the "free speech" that was supposed to characterize the final days of ESMB?
Why didn't you put the term "banned" underneath his avatar as usual?
Is he getting a "banned" message? If not then he's not banned. Tell him to clear his cookies. Oh and tell him his new login is "Out Effix"He apparently was last night once the board came back up.
He wasn't able to get back on at that time.
Does Alanzo have administrative privileges?
Ya big wuss!I couldn't do the "Spamming" thing. It's now "Out Effix".