Panda Termint
Cabal Of One


Oooo, now in the comments section the OSA Bots are saying that I have a long history of adultery. That's just libelous. I knew this was coming but that's just hilarious. Too bad ya can't prove who these sock puppet dudes are.

old timer Nov 13, 2011 9:03 PM
True Marian, but not as dull as JackParsons (below). Jack is one of those people who revels in anonymous criticism. But is incapable of any constructive activity. And I speak as one who has known him personally for a long time.
NCSP Nov 13, 2011 9:09 PM
Speaking of reveling in anonymous criticism, is "old timer" the name that appears on your birth certificate?
old timer Nov 13, 2011 9:26 PM
Yes Mr NCSP. My friends call me "old," but to you it is "Mr. Timer."
NCSP Nov 13, 2011 9:32 PM
I take it then that you also prefer to remain anonymous. I don't begrudge you that right -- and it is your right. Just try not to be such a hypocrite about it.
old timer Nov 13, 2011 10:37 PM
We've had this conversation before NCSP, although we were both using other socks at the time. You are one of those hypocrites who believe in freedom of speech . . . as long as people follow your rules and don't upset you.
NCSP Nov 13, 2011 11:26 PM
I have pointed out before that anonymous people shouldn't condemn others for being anonymous, yes. But I've never used another screen name. I obviously have no way of proving that, but at least I have the personal satisfaction of knowing that I'm not guilty of sockpuppetry and you freely admit that you are.
They ALWAYS try to discredit women with the same old tired line.
I'm at work & can't watch the video till I get home but I'm sooo looking forward to seeing you speak Sindy!!![]()
Christ, didn't the president of the United States "commit adultery". Who cares?
The fact that somebody screws a few or many other people outside of a marriage has almost NOTHNG to do with how they pretty much function in all others areas of life (despite the nonsense Hubbard wrote about "out-2D" and "2D rules"). Including "telling the truth about a great many things".
I suspect that people don't really care too much about accusations of adultery these days, at least surely not like they did when Hubbard wrote his nonsense 40-50 years ago.
And, even if you "were guilty of adultery", how does that change the TRUTH that you spoke about Scientology? :confused2:
There is something I never understood about Scientology tactics. How does getting someone to be viewed as as any sort of "criminal" change the truthfulness or legitimacy about what they have stated about the flaws and faults of Scientology? Plus, by now, any person who reads anything on the Internet should know that Scientology lies about ANY person who criticizes them, and Scn tries to portray them as "nasty criminals" in some flimsy attempt to get others to "not pay attention to the accurate & honest words of the critic". Scientology is just SO TRANSPARENT. They are SUCH IMBECILES. And, the world sees that more and more clearly as each new day passes. tick -tock
Note: If there is no truth to the accusations, too bad there isn't a way to trace WHO posted the libelous statements and SUE THE FUCK OUT OF THEM. OSA tactics back at them! Overwhelming lawsuits against THEM!![]()

Yeah I know, but my point is that Synthia could be a born again virgin & they'll still try the "adulteress" line. They think it actually bothers people in 2011.
Yeah I know, but my point is that Synthia could be a born again virgin & they'll still try the "adulteress" line. They think it actually bothers people in 2011.
). The same idea appears in politics where some adversary gets "caught in a slander" - that hopefully now makes nobody listen to or trust the fellow.There is no truth to that and I would love to do that. They just think nothing of throwing out total character assassination lies like that...have no compunction at all. I asked the person to name names..let's go. I mean, they can't.
I would think a person with any kind of conscience at all would feel bad about telling lies after awhile but, I bet what happens is that the OSA Bots are told the lies by people who really don't care about lying and so they pass it on, not thinking they are lying.
It's not just adultery, it's "a long history" of adultery! It really is laughable. If that's true, why did they have me on staff.![]()

There is no truth to that and I would love to do that. They just think nothing of throwing out total character assassination lies like that...have no compunction at all. I asked the person to name names..let's go. I mean, they can't.
I would think a person with any kind of conscience at all would feel bad about telling lies after awhile but, I bet what happens is that the OSA Bots are told the lies by people who really don't care about lying and so they pass it on, not thinking they are lying.
It's not just adultery, it's "a long history" of adultery! It really is laughable. If that's true, why did they have me on staff.![]()
It's not just adultery, it's "a long history" of adultery! It really is laughable. If that's true, why did they have me on staff.![]()

If they understood ordinary people they'd know this reflects badly on them, not you.
![]()
these slanderous measures really do show every day people just how desperate the cofs has become. 

Just watch Synthia's interview
Synthia you were talking with no hesitation - a to b - direct to the point of what it is.
Well done.
Yeah I know, but my point is that Synthia could be a born again virgin & they'll still try the "adulteress" line. They think it actually bothers people in 2011.



these slanderous measures really do show every day people just how desperate the cofs has become.
They really are making a laughing stock of themselves![]()
![]()

Oooo, now in the comments section the OSA Bots are saying that I have a long history of adultery. That's just libelous. I knew this was coming but that's just hilarious. Too bad ya can't prove who these sock puppet dudes are.
I would only comment that the Church of Scientology has ALWAYS practiced slander as one of many methods used to try to silence or negate the statements of critics. They haven't recently or suddenly just begun to resort to such tactics "out of desperation".
I and I'm sure, many others are very well aware of the fact that this "practised slander" by the cofs has been used for a very very very long time.
even before I was born !!! 

It's easy to get riled up at the scio's comments about the videos. But the only people that would agree with those posts are other scios. I'm sure 99% of non-scio public who happens to read those inane posts are shaking their head in disbelief at how loony scientologists really are.
Dear scio posters, please keep foot-bulleting away!
Does anyone have a link for the comments? My blood pressure needs a bit of a workout!
I and I'm sure, many others are very well aware of the fact that this "practised slander" by the cofs has been used for a very very very long time.
I do know this is not a 'recent' turn of events.
These ancient tactics have been used by the cofs for so long...even before I was born !!!
Needless to say...it don't work![]()
![]()




