Repeated cruelty? I am speaking about the Aftermath show. One show. Where is the repeated cruelty? Was this on FB message boards that Cathy doesn't read?
Again you just fail to acknowledge that Cathy did have some role. The point was that she was being a good scilon and doing what policy dictated - and I think that was what Aftremath was trying to show. That is the point, not Cathy True. Losing a daughter is heartbreaking. I'm not blaming Cathy. I don't read FB groups so I haven't seen any "repeated cruelty" that you speak of.
I'll do my best to keep my desire to be liked and admired under control. Thank you Ron!
You have valid points about group think. I too was not happy with the whole pedophile thing Tony ran with over one line in DMSMH. It does not reflect the beliefs of scilons in general IMO. I've never posted on the UB. I read UB every day. I find his intolerance to be unfortunate and over the top at times. But Tony is Tony. Overall he does a good job keeping up with the happenings. I sure wouldn't want to have to create a story every day about co$, there's so little going on there other than sucking money from the parishoners.
There's enough bad in the co$ without having to invent or go hyperbolic. I see it.
Prior to that Aftermath episode - which added absolutely nothing new to that story - except for Paul Haggis' daughter's painting - Tony Ortega did
two stories on Cathy Tweed and her daughter's suicide.
The first story ended with a bunch of UBers blaming Cathy Tweed for her daughter's death. Pretty sick and cruel, and normal for them. Then, some months later, Tony brought in licensed therapist and "cult expert" Rachel Bernstein to mentally shame Cathy Tweed for statements she made to Tony on the phone
the day after her daughter's funeral.
See my blog post here about that:
Tony Ortega & Rachel Bernstein’s Abuse of Scientologist Cathy Tweed
Writing this story got me banned from Tony's blog, along with quite a few other social costs that came with it. Those costs remain to this day.
Looking back, knowing the costs this blog post exacted on me, would I write and publish it again?
Absolutely. I left Scientology because of the tribalism and cruelty I saw there, and helped to expose them on the Internet. Their resulting fair game also had a lot of social costs for me. I'm not going to sit around and say nothing while the same cruelty and abuse happens again in anti-Scientology.
See P&B, you don't see this stuff yet. You think you are "exposing the crimes and abuses of Scientology" with your friends. Too often, that's not what's happening at all. Too often, it's just a bunch of cruelty and repeated, robotic negativity about other human beings who presently have different beliefs than you do.
Cathy Tweed is not a public figure. She is not responsible for the abuse in Scientology. She lost a daughter to suicide. Lots of people think they know what goes on in the mind of a person who commits suicide and will blame others for it. It's one of the craziest and most cruel things you can do to a mother who has lost her daughter to suicide.
So back to the original point: when you see something like this, knowing that it will make you very unpopular among all your anti-Scientology friends, do you have the balls to speak up?
EDITED TO ADD ONE MORE QUESTION: And if you don't have the balls to speak up, but someone on your board does have the balls to speak up - how will you treat his unpopular ideas?