Before I got involved with Scientology it was considered pretty much common knowledge that people often leave, or at least begin to consider other options, when they are upset.
Or in other words ARC broken.
Might be a divorce where there is sufficient upset to where the partners are no longer desiring to share the same space.
Any number of upsets could get a person to at the very least begin looking for a change of space.
However, it just flabbergasts me that people can become so misled as to think that "hey, I want to find greener pastures, Oh boy, I must have committed some overts".
My god, what kind of deep hypnosis are people under that they no longer can grasp simple, basic truths that upsets often set the stage for desire of change.
I guess that rewording upset as ARC break removes it from one's common sense reservoir/repository and someone with a vested interest in keeping you trapped then goes so far as to make you think that the desire to be elsewhere always comes from having committed overts.
All the horseshit of Scientology is built upon this false platform and premise and that so many people still buy it even once they renounce Scientology is what I find so unbelievable.
I learned about ARC breaks from Scientology books before I got on lines and never did buy into the O/W crap as "always the case" for what Hubbard called "blows". Sure, it's at times the case but no assumptions should be made on that account.
Unless you wish to introvert someone into such a spin that they become cowed and thus incapable of a blow!
To me it was still about ARC breaks, upsets, when I didn't feel comfortable enough in a space that I at least began to look for alternatives because that's what words of wisdom I'd already gained from Scientology basic books.
And they couldn't change my mind about any of it in post "72 Scientology's "new tech".
Plus, if overts or withholds caused blows then senior management positions would have been vacant for years if not decades.
There are as many reasons for changing spaces as there are sets of circumstances and individuals in the differing sets of circumstances, no way of assuming it's for any one reason at all.
Doesn't have to be caused by an upset either, could actually be from rationally/sanely determined decisions including having the ability and right to change one's mind.