FoTi
Crusader
No, it's an agenda that is designed to protect conference attendees from legal harassment that Shawn Lonsdale experienced.
Go fight the injunction in court yourself if you want to talk about AMA's errors.
This is not at all what CiC has argued. I agree with his assessment that interaction at a multi-day, anti-Scientology conference with a person named by the LMT injunction is far closer to the line of "acting in concert" than simply being Facebook friends with that person. The fact that conference attendees will be protesting in downtown Clearwater after the conference is also an important consideration.
Painting people who engage in honest debate with you as your mortal enemies is a fallacy of the Godwin type.
No one at WWP put the scare into the organizers. They made this decision on their own, as the links I posted earlier for you show. I am defending their decision. The CoS agenda is not being run at WWP, Mr. Godwin.
As CiC has stated, it's easy for you to criticize, because you did nothing, risked nothing, had no skin in the game, and no responsibility to protect the people who you invited to your city for your 5-day anti-Scientology conference. It wasn't a "smear" to say that you should put your ass on the line first, it was a challenge. You are challenging AMA to potentially violate the LMT injunction. It is only fair that you be challenged to violate it yourself. Put Your Ass On The Line First, Sir. This is not a Smear, but a Challenge.
First reasonable thing you've said in this entire post.
May I suggest that you clear the words and clay demo the entire LMT injunction until you actually do understand what it says.

Sheesh. 






