What's new

Marty Rathbun raises his head, and starts squawking PART 2

programmer_guy

True Ex-Scientologist

When Marty pauses and looks down at something (notes?) I wonder if it his own notes or if those are notes from someone else telling him what to say?

:confused2:
 

George Layton

Silver Meritorious Patron
.


[video=youtube;fH5iAFnzkCE]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fH5iAFnzkCE&ab_channel=HiberniaEugenesis[/video]



Wanna see "Duper's Delight"? Go to 01:23 of that video for a few seconds.

I must mention in passing that I have seen that same kind of facial construct so many times while in Scientology, particularly from a Guardian's Office/OSA thug in the midst of staging their TR-L crafted "acceptable truth".

The best way I can describe it is that they just sort of flash a glassy-eyed, smugly self-satisfied, leering smirk.

The last time I saw it up close from a Scientologist, in person, was years ago when I randomly ended up chatting briefly to a person I had never met nor seen before, while shopping in a mall. I tend to strike up conversations with strangers all the time when I am waiting in lines, in elevators or any other place where I encounter homo sapiens and there are a few moments to fill with something better than silence, lol.

Within about 20-30 seconds I heard a "tell" that made me wonder if they were perhaps a Scientologist. So I continued the conversation, very subtly steering things closer and closer without them having a clue. And, YES, it turns out that once upon a time they were a Scientologist. Doing my dumb act (well-practiced, and quite compelling I might add, lol) I sort of mentioned in a dull-disoriented way that I had once heard about Scientology. (e.g. "Hey, wasn't that the religion that the guy who wrote Dianetics created?") Now the person I was chatting with got very interested in me for some reason, perhaps because they'd successfully identified a human who was willing to raptly listen to their shore stories? lol.

The conversation was further stealthily maneuvered into other archives (e.g. "Hey, I don't know if I am confusing this, but didn't I read a long, long time ago that Scientologists got in trouble with the US government or something?") This is where I learned that the person I was talking to had been a (proud) ranking member of the GO at that time. Of course, they had NO IDEA WHATSOEVER that I had been a Scientologist or that I already knew everything about that which I was asking (evil 1.1, right? lol).

So, having taken them into deep waters and noting that they were now "locked in" on handling me, I dropped the bomb: "Hey, I don't know if I remember this right (it was so long ago!) but decades ago, didn't I read a newspaper article saying that Hubbard's wife went to jail or whatever?") This is the precise point they pulled out their old GO bag of tricks and went to work--and their visage immediately transformed.

"No, no no, LOL. That was all so completely & incorrectly reported by the media!"

(ME): "But didn't she get convicted and go to federal prison?"

(Now the creepy fixed leering smirk erupted): "Oh, actually that wasn't the story at all. Mary Sue Hubbard's only "crime" was that she "borrowed some copy paper!"[SUP]* [/SUP](cue happy twinkling eyes with full-dial smirk). I watched their face intently for any sign of remorse or cringe for lying so blatantly. None. Just the "winning face" of a Scientologist applying their hoax-craft.

Although, as mentioned, I have seen this duping F/N face many times before, it was nonetheless quite surprising to see how that "borrowed some copy paper" line lit up their facial expression with the gloat of triumphant tech treachery.

I mention all this only because I see that exact same face in Rathbun's many videos. He is grinning and winning as he spews a stream of degenerate & despicable lies. Probably F/Ning too.

Did anyone have any other questions about the malicious mental illness known as Scientology?





[SUP]*[/SUP] Mary Sue Hubbard merely "borrowed some copy paper" :
Pay no attention to what was the "biggest espionage raid in FBI history" that targeted the "largest infiltration ever vs. the US government". (You see, all that breaking and entering, espionage, robbery, grand theft and wide-scale spy network that penetrated US governmental buildings, agencies, files and computers---all that was just so that retrieve some data--so of course Mary Sue wanted that data "in writing", thus it was all so innocent that she mentioned to her spy network that it sure would be good if she could get some photocopies. And so, naturally, she needed some copy paper. Hey, people in offices in every city in the world make photocopies every single day, there's no crime here, move along. Anyways, I'm sure Mary Sue would be willing to replace the copy paper, no need to get all upset and launch into a witch-hunt!)

.

Hey they needed a LOT of copy paper, they were out of toilet paper everywhere.
 

George Layton

Silver Meritorious Patron
Re: Marty Rathbun raises his head, and starts squawking

I've already told you this s not true!

There is an organisation that would be delighted to forward,
invent, repost bad PR about Tony O.

You have not demonstrated that TO is COB. So put up
evidence she is or shut up!

Did you happen to ask her if she wished it was her that posted it?
 

dchoiceisalwaysrs

Gold Meritorious Patron
As long as the comment is stored in the database that is fully accessible by an admin, anything can be changed.

You are discussing Wordpress I assume.
Of course, as weak as my knowledge is in this area, I suppose just about any site can't be hacked and one of the tools for it is somehow raising(increase the depth) the level of control. Escalation I think it is called.

So legitimate or otherwise, and I think this has been mentioned before. who controls what shows on Marty's blog now.

I suppose even the history can be altered if high enough level of control is attained. So what we can see today might not be exactly as it was when first created.

Which reminds me when I got my first computer I had to go in and zero fill some sectors on a floppy to be able to reuse the space. It worked perfectly even though I learnt how to do it while reading in a language other than English, my only close to fluent one.

Maybe we can re-write history to exclude hubbard's birth using these virtual techniques. It might be worth the attempt. :biggrin:
 
Last edited:

dchoiceisalwaysrs

Gold Meritorious Patron
.


[video=youtube;fH5iAFnzkCE]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fH5iAFnzkCE&ab_channel=HiberniaEugenesis[/video]



Wanna see "Duper's Delight"? Go to 01:23 of that video for a few seconds.

I must mention in passing that I have seen that same kind of facial construct so many times while in Scientology, particularly from a Guardian's Office/OSA thug in the midst of staging their TR-L crafted "acceptable truth".

The best way I can describe it is that they just sort of flash a glassy-eyed, smugly self-satisfied, leering smirk.

The last time I saw it up close from a Scientologist, in person, was years ago when I randomly ended up chatting briefly to a person I had never met nor seen before, while shopping in a mall. I tend to strike up conversations with strangers all the time when I am waiting in lines, in elevators or any other place where I encounter homo sapiens and there are a few moments to fill with something better than silence, lol.

Within about 20-30 seconds I heard a "tell" that made me wonder if they were perhaps a Scientologist. So I continued the conversation, very subtly steering things closer and closer without them having a clue. And, YES, it turns out that once upon a time they were a Scientologist. Doing my dumb act (well-practiced, and quite compelling I might add, lol) I sort of mentioned in a dull-disoriented way that I had once heard about Scientology. (e.g. "Hey, wasn't that the religion that the guy who wrote Dianetics created?") Now the person I was chatting with got very interested in me for some reason, perhaps because they'd successfully identified a human who was willing to raptly listen to their shore stories? lol.

The conversation was further stealthily maneuvered into other archives (e.g. "Hey, I don't know if I am confusing this, but didn't I read a long, long time ago that Scientologists got in trouble with the US government or something?") This is where I learned that the person I was talking to had been a (proud) ranking member of the GO at that time. Of course, they had NO IDEA WHATSOEVER that I had been a Scientologist or that I already knew everything about that which I was asking (evil 1.1, right? lol).

So, having taken them into deep waters and noting that they were now "locked in" on handling me, I dropped the bomb: "Hey, I don't know if I remember this right (it was so long ago!) but decades ago, didn't I read a newspaper article saying that Hubbard's wife went to jail or whatever?") This is the precise point they pulled out their old GO bag of tricks and went to work--and their visage immediately transformed.

"No, no no, LOL. That was all so completely & incorrectly reported by the media!"

(ME): "But didn't she get convicted and go to federal prison?"

(Now the creepy fixed leering smirk erupted): "Oh, actually that wasn't the story at all. Mary Sue Hubbard's only "crime" was that she "borrowed some copy paper!"[SUP]* [/SUP](cue happy twinkling eyes with full-dial smirk). I watched their face intently for any sign of remorse or cringe for lying so blatantly. None. Just the "winning face" of a Scientologist applying their hoax-craft.

Although, as mentioned, I have seen this duping F/N face many times before, it was nonetheless quite surprising to see how that "borrowed some copy paper" line lit up their facial expression with the gloat of triumphant tech treachery.

I mention all this only because I see that exact same face in Rathbun's many videos. He is grinning and winning as he spews a stream of degenerate & despicable lies. Probably F/Ning too.

Did anyone have any other questions about the malicious mental illness known as Scientology?





[SUP]*[/SUP] Mary Sue Hubbard merely "borrowed some copy paper" :
Pay no attention to what was the "biggest espionage raid in FBI history" that targeted the "largest infiltration ever vs. the US government". (You see, all that breaking and entering, espionage, robbery, grand theft and wide-scale spy network that penetrated US governmental buildings, agencies, files and computers---all that was just so that retrieve some data--so of course Mary Sue wanted that data "in writing", thus it was all so innocent that she mentioned to her spy network that it sure would be good if she could get some photocopies. And so, naturally, she needed some copy paper. Hey, people in offices in every city in the world make photocopies every single day, there's no crime here, move along. Anyways, I'm sure Mary Sue would be willing to replace the copy paper, no need to get all upset and launch into a witch-hunt!)

.


Yes, my question is;

Will Thomas Szasz be released an updated version of his Manufacture of Madness with some chapters on "scientology> the M R case demonstration " with free audio/video DVD insert....errrh I mean a Super 8 taped included?
 

Glenda

Crusader
Did my own research. I wore protective clothing. This whole thing disgusts me! :angry:

Marty is owned! Sold his soul.

I will not put the link here because I can't/won't do that. The site where you can find Martee vids about Leah Remini can be found if you search term leah remini aftermath dot com.

It is a site owned by the cult of s international.
 

anonomog

Gold Meritorious Patron
You are discussing Wordpress I assume.
Of course, as weak as my knowledge is in this area, I suppose just about any site can't be hacked and one of the tools for it is somehow raising(increase the depth) the level of control. Escalation I think it is called.

So legitimate or otherwise, and I think this has been mentioned before. who controls what shows on Marty's blog now.

I suppose even the history can be altered if high enough level of control is attained. So what we can see today might not be exactly as it was when first created.

Which reminds me when I got my first computer I had to go in and zero fill some sectors on a floppy to be able to reuse the space. It worked perfectly even though I learnt how to do it while reading in a language other than English, my only close to fluent one.

Maybe we can re-write history to exclude hubbard's birth using these virtual techniques. I might be worth the attempt. :biggrin:

Rewriting history on a blog is easy. Removing the evidence from wayback machine or archive.is not so much.

They could change every mention of "demented midget" into "esteemed and noble leader" or remove articles and request search engines to remove them as site owners. But for Marty's blog this would be silly. It has been used and preserved as a source of reference too much for it to be feasible.

But I wouldn't be surprised if they try. Because cult reasons.
 

Glenda

Crusader
There really is no low that this cult won't go to. None.

Recently I discovered that one of last years freedom medal winners was someone I had known when I was in the cult. Out of interest I looked up what he won the award for. Full of lies. And I can prove many of them. I worked with the man for many years. The IAS spin story of why he won the award was 85% bullshit. This cult lies internally, and externally, every time the lips move. It is almost incomprehensible the level of distortion and destruction scientology is involved in.

This cult lies and lies and lies and lies. It isn't funny. People's lives get destroyed.

I am not shocked that Marty is now back under cult control and his vids are being used on official cult hate sites. But I am angry. I am angry at the human wastage this cult induces. I am angry about the families it rips apart. I am angry. :angry:
 

Knows

Gold Meritorious Patron
Re: Marty Rathbun raises his head, and starts squawking

I LOVE THIS ! :clap::thumbsup:

Marty is a former cult thug, a blogger who home schooled in quantum theory and now specializes in character assassination.

Besides cult work, including his current freelance assignment, his work background includes peanut vendor at baseball games, lawn sprinkling operations, and stringer for the Corpus Christi Caller-Times, former CEO of a Flea Market Stand cuz he struck Gold selling his soul to the Demon that Runs the Cult of Scientology - Arch Enemy - David Miscavige.

Marty Rathbun is rich. So is his attorney. (in my opionion) Trust me on this one!!:yes:


His education includes Hubbard College, FEBC, Class 12 Auditor, C/S and OSA trained THUG.

Trying college for a semester but dropping out.

He's the author of three book-shaped objects and a legend in his own mind.
 

George Layton

Silver Meritorious Patron
Re: Marty Rathbun raises his head, and starts squawking

I've already told you this s not true!

There is an organisation that would be delighted to forward,
invent, repost bad PR about Tony O.

You have not demonstrated that TO is COB. So put up
evidence she is or shut up!

Another question. Did you happen to ask her why she hasn't posted at Marty's, on any of the new videos?
 

John McGhee

Patron
Re: Marty Rathbun raises his head, and starts squawking

Another question. Did you happen to ask her why she hasn't posted at Marty's, on any of the new videos?
It's like attending a funeral and looking around to see who's shown up; somebody's absence is more noticeable than their presence
 

Boson Wog Stark

Patron Meritorious
[video]https://youtu.be/fH5iAFnzkCE[/video]

I'm doing a second post on Pt. 11, because Marty's review on Leah's segment about Paulette Cooper is an especially nutty ramble. He characterizes the episode as being a "mutual stroke fest" over "stuff" that went on, and it was stuff they were "tasked with abolishing," and that got "settled." No mention of what this stuff was.

Or, rather, he insinuates that Paulette's settlement was the result of an old story where Paulette Cooper "had a beef with Scientology and settled it." See folks? Cooper had a beef with Scientology and settled it. That's the whole story. Nothing to see here. Move on.

He doesn't mention the most basic things like Paulette Cooper wrote a book, or that Scientology framed her for making a bomb threat she didn't make. That's all part of the "stuff" that went on which is not worth mentioning, because it happened years ago.

Here are Marty's own words in Pt. 11, and the segments I'm leaving out do not clarify any of this:

The stuff she alleged, we were young men when we first got involved in handling this stuff. We were dealing with activities that we were tasked with abolishing, and did, at that time. And he's (Rinder) saying 37, 35 years later, "They will do this." And so it's this mutual stroke fest, this series which is degenerating progressively more and more into. So they're stroking Cooper for all this stuff she would settle satisfactorily 35 years ago, and acting as if Scientology will do those things now, right? With no predicate or basis.

It's this mutual stroke fest which is a creation on top of a creation. They're creating Paulette Cooper into something that exists in the present, and she's creating them as serving some useful purpose, and it's all just a creation of their imaginations.


Although he's getting caught up in his own jumble of words, Marty sounds like he said Paulette Cooper doesn't exist in the present. He is trying to deny that Paulette was followed and monitored by the cult years after she received a settlement, and with that he's suggesting the cult would never have anyone followed today, although he doesn't come out and say that. He just thinks his jumble of words will lead listeners to that conclusion.

Does Pat Broeker exist only in the past? Is Shelly Miscavige only in the past? How about L. Ron Hubbard, he in the past too, therefore not worth bringing up?

If Marty ever rambled this incomprehensibly when he was making an appearance on TV, being critical of either Miscavige or Hubbard, it was edited out.

I suppose that an analog for this series by Marty is the PR videos put out by Scientology where Scientologists enthuse about things, and often say total nonsense like, "I didn't know, but now I know." It's not about the content which matters, but you're supposed to catch the wave of enthusiasm and want to take that course or level to have your mind blown.

So the viewer of Marty's series is supposed to ride Marty's wave of critical thinking and knowingness concerning the critics of Scientology, which is bizarre because the cult has said he's a lunatic, which is backed up in part by this nonsensical ramble.

But I think it is an act. Marty is not imparting any "data." He's conveying a feeling and establishing a position. He is no longer a person who is going to criticize Scientology, Hubbard, or Miscavige, nor is he going to reflect critically on his own evolution or something as basic as what caused this shift in his thinking.
 
Last edited:

Lurker5

Gold Meritorious Patron
I think mawtee might be stroking his 'fest' - maybe that is what he is looking at when he looks down.
(Am I allowed to say stuff like this? :unsure::nervous:)
He sure is getting off on himself . . .
And we are all disgusted he is doing this in public.
Isn't there some 'rule' in scno/co$ that forbids playing with one's self?
Or is it dm he is doing (even if just in fantasy) ?
Either way, isn't there a scno/co$ RULE and punishments for that kind of self indulgence - in public?

He should be 'fessing' THAT up . . .
Gives whole new meaning to the term 'whack job' - as in - He's a real 'whack job".
(Am I allowed to say this stuff? :unsure::nervous:)
 

Type4_PTS

Diamond Invictus SP
[video]https://youtu.be/fH5iAFnzkCE[/video]

I'm doing a second post on Pt. 11, because Marty's review on Leah's segment about Paulette Cooper is an especially nutty ramble. He characterizes the episode as being a "mutual stroke fest" over "stuff" that went on, and it was stuff they were "tasked with abolishing," and that got "settled." No mention of what this stuff was.

Or, rather, he insinuates that Paulette's settlement was the result of an old story where Paulette Cooper "had a beef with Scientology and settled it." See folks? Cooper had a beef with Scientology and settled it. That's the whole story. Nothing to see here. Move on.

He doesn't mention the most basic things like Paulette Cooper wrote a book, or that Scientology framed her for making a bomb threat she didn't make. That's all part of the "stuff" that went on which is not worth mentioning, because it happened years ago.

Here are Marty's own words in Pt. 11, and the segments I'm leaving out do not clarify any of this:

The stuff she alleged, we were young men when we first got involved in handling this stuff. We were dealing with activities that we were tasked with abolishing, and did, at that time. And he's (Rinder) saying 37, 35 years later, "They will do this." And so it's this mutual stroke fest, this series which is degenerating progressively more and more into. So they're stroking Cooper for all this stuff she would settle satisfactorily 35 years ago, and acting as if Scientology will do those things now, right? With no predicate or basis.

It's this mutual stroke fest which is a creation on top of a creation. They're creating Paulette Cooper into something that exists in the present, and she's creating them as serving some useful purpose, and it's all just a creation of their imaginations.


Although it's getting caught up in his own jumble of words, Marty sounds like he said Paulette Cooper doesn't exist in the present. He is trying to deny that Paulette was followed and monitored by the cult years after she received a settlement, and with that he's suggesting the cult would never have anyone followed today, although he doesn't come out and say that. He just thinks his jumble of words will lead listeners to that conclusion.

Does Pat Broeker exist only in the past? Is Shelly Miscavige only in the past? How about L. Ron Hubbard, he in the past too, therefore not worth bringing up?

If Marty ever rambled this incomprehensibly when he was making an appearance on TV, being critical of either Miscavige or Hubbard, it was edited out.

I suppose that an analog for this series by Marty is the PR videos put out by Scientology where Scientologists enthuse about things, and often say total nonsense like, "I didn't know, but now I know." It's not about the content which matters, but you're supposed to catch the wave of enthusiasm and want to take that course or level to have your mind blown.

So the viewer of Marty's series is supposed to ride Marty's wave of critical thinking and knowingness concerning the critics of Scientology, which is bizarre because the cult has said he's a lunatic, which is backed up in part by this nonsensical ramble.

But I think it is an act. Marty is not imparting any "data." He's conveying a feeling and establishing a position. He is no longer a person who is going to criticize Scientology, Hubbard, or Miscavige, nor is he going to reflect critically on his own evolution or something as basic as what caused this shift in his thinking.

I don't often agree with the CoS, but even a broken clock is right twice a day. :biggrin:
 
Last edited:

anonomog

Gold Meritorious Patron
Sunday is Karen, Ron Miscavige and Mike's turn.

Word salad, rambling, almost incoherent.

Karen pays for everybody to do everything and anything. By the sounds of it Karen could finance first world governments. Probably does. Jeez Karen who knew!

Except Marty who won't be bought. Ever. No not him. Uh uh. Nope. Right. Okay? Maybe just a little but not where it mattered unlike the other two degenerates.

David Miscavige is the son every parent wants. Joined the SO because drugs and his generation going downhill and the miracle asthma cure. Hallelujah praise xenu.
Ron so feeble minded one google search changed 80 years of faith. No consistency obviously, except for 80 years. Slacker.

What else. Rinder money grubbing fame whore spotlight hog. Daaamn. He sure hides it well.

Leah. Well Leah makes everything up for effect and every one in the ASC just lets it go. As long as it tells the story. Weird thing there. I have been corrected a number of times by exes and concepts explained. I wonder where they have all gone?
Hmm. They are still here. I'll ask them.
 

Boson Wog Stark

Patron Meritorious
The purpose of Leah's show is stated on its website:

Leah Remini: Scientology and the Aftermath gives a voice to victims of the Church of Scientology despite public attempts to discredit them.

It seems like a fair description. Obviously, this hurts the goal of Scientology, its current math, to make money, make money, make more money, improving the lives of everyone who does Scientology, while destroying or at least intimidating anyone who speaks against it, branding them as bigots or anti-religion.

Besides warding off raw meat from joining, Leah's show accomplishes something which wouldn't be allowed when Scientology becomes the law one day: having ex-members speak out about their experiences in Scientology. From seeing Leah's show, many ex-members of Scientology are going to get the idea they'd like to speak out. Scientology can't have that!

In all his babbling, the thing Marty can't say is how he was spied upon and tormented for speaking out about his experiences in Scientology, and what he thought of David Miscavige. He's yet to explain why he thinks other people, like on Leah's show, should not be allowed to talk about their experiences or, rather, need to have their experiences assessed through the critical filter of super SP, kingpin of the "Posse of Lunatics" (according to Freedom Magazine) turned critic of the critics, Marty Rathbun.

It's not like he worked with any of these people, except for Rinder, maybe, as closely as he worked with David Miscavige, whom he compared to Hitler. Marty said in a deposition this wasn't being critical. Marty thought of it as factual, probably, like Hubbard almost being hit by a freight locomotive on Venus? Hubbard said that was factual, so you know it couldn't be his imagination. I mention this because Marty thinks that most recollections of bad things which happened to victims of Scientology is just their imaginations. Scientology couldn't possibly hurt anyone. It's a philosophy!

Through its policy/philosophy/science/religion, Scientology expects members who leave to spend their next trillion years shivering in darkness and complete silence, relative to talking about what they experienced in Scientology. No comment on how ludicrous that is, Marty? That's justified by Hubbard's dumpster load of books is it?

Scientology can't enforce the silence of its ex-members or other victims anymore, so it's time to send in the one man SP video cavalry, critic of the critics, Marty Rathbun.
 
Top