programmer_guy
True Ex-Scientologist
When Marty pauses and looks down at something (notes?) I wonder if it his own notes or if those are notes from someone else telling him what to say?
:confused2:
.
[video=youtube;fH5iAFnzkCE]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fH5iAFnzkCE&ab_channel=HiberniaEugenesis[/video]
Wanna see "Duper's Delight"? Go to 01:23 of that video for a few seconds.
I must mention in passing that I have seen that same kind of facial construct so many times while in Scientology, particularly from a Guardian's Office/OSA thug in the midst of staging their TR-L crafted "acceptable truth".
The best way I can describe it is that they just sort of flash a glassy-eyed, smugly self-satisfied, leering smirk.
The last time I saw it up close from a Scientologist, in person, was years ago when I randomly ended up chatting briefly to a person I had never met nor seen before, while shopping in a mall. I tend to strike up conversations with strangers all the time when I am waiting in lines, in elevators or any other place where I encounter homo sapiens and there are a few moments to fill with something better than silence, lol.
Within about 20-30 seconds I heard a "tell" that made me wonder if they were perhaps a Scientologist. So I continued the conversation, very subtly steering things closer and closer without them having a clue. And, YES, it turns out that once upon a time they were a Scientologist. Doing my dumb act (well-practiced, and quite compelling I might add, lol) I sort of mentioned in a dull-disoriented way that I had once heard about Scientology. (e.g. "Hey, wasn't that the religion that the guy who wrote Dianetics created?") Now the person I was chatting with got very interested in me for some reason, perhaps because they'd successfully identified a human who was willing to raptly listen to their shore stories? lol.
The conversation was further stealthily maneuvered into other archives (e.g. "Hey, I don't know if I am confusing this, but didn't I read a long, long time ago that Scientologists got in trouble with the US government or something?") This is where I learned that the person I was talking to had been a (proud) ranking member of the GO at that time. Of course, they had NO IDEA WHATSOEVER that I had been a Scientologist or that I already knew everything about that which I was asking (evil 1.1, right? lol).
So, having taken them into deep waters and noting that they were now "locked in" on handling me, I dropped the bomb: "Hey, I don't know if I remember this right (it was so long ago!) but decades ago, didn't I read a newspaper article saying that Hubbard's wife went to jail or whatever?") This is the precise point they pulled out their old GO bag of tricks and went to work--and their visage immediately transformed.
"No, no no, LOL. That was all so completely & incorrectly reported by the media!"
(ME): "But didn't she get convicted and go to federal prison?"
(Now the creepy fixed leering smirk erupted): "Oh, actually that wasn't the story at all. Mary Sue Hubbard's only "crime" was that she "borrowed some copy paper!"[SUP]* [/SUP](cue happy twinkling eyes with full-dial smirk). I watched their face intently for any sign of remorse or cringe for lying so blatantly. None. Just the "winning face" of a Scientologist applying their hoax-craft.
Although, as mentioned, I have seen this duping F/N face many times before, it was nonetheless quite surprising to see how that "borrowed some copy paper" line lit up their facial expression with the gloat of triumphant tech treachery.
I mention all this only because I see that exact same face in Rathbun's many videos. He is grinning and winning as he spews a stream of degenerate & despicable lies. Probably F/Ning too.
Did anyone have any other questions about the malicious mental illness known as Scientology?
[SUP]*[/SUP] Mary Sue Hubbard merely "borrowed some copy paper" : Pay no attention to what was the "biggest espionage raid in FBI history" that targeted the "largest infiltration ever vs. the US government". (You see, all that breaking and entering, espionage, robbery, grand theft and wide-scale spy network that penetrated US governmental buildings, agencies, files and computers---all that was just so that retrieve some data--so of course Mary Sue wanted that data "in writing", thus it was all so innocent that she mentioned to her spy network that it sure would be good if she could get some photocopies. And so, naturally, she needed some copy paper. Hey, people in offices in every city in the world make photocopies every single day, there's no crime here, move along. Anyways, I'm sure Mary Sue would be willing to replace the copy paper, no need to get all upset and launch into a witch-hunt!)
.
I've already told you this s not true!
There is an organisation that would be delighted to forward,
invent, repost bad PR about Tony O.
You have not demonstrated that TO is COB. So put up
evidence she is or shut up!
As long as the comment is stored in the database that is fully accessible by an admin, anything can be changed.

.
[video=youtube;fH5iAFnzkCE]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fH5iAFnzkCE&ab_channel=HiberniaEugenesis[/video]
Wanna see "Duper's Delight"? Go to 01:23 of that video for a few seconds.
I must mention in passing that I have seen that same kind of facial construct so many times while in Scientology, particularly from a Guardian's Office/OSA thug in the midst of staging their TR-L crafted "acceptable truth".
The best way I can describe it is that they just sort of flash a glassy-eyed, smugly self-satisfied, leering smirk.
The last time I saw it up close from a Scientologist, in person, was years ago when I randomly ended up chatting briefly to a person I had never met nor seen before, while shopping in a mall. I tend to strike up conversations with strangers all the time when I am waiting in lines, in elevators or any other place where I encounter homo sapiens and there are a few moments to fill with something better than silence, lol.
Within about 20-30 seconds I heard a "tell" that made me wonder if they were perhaps a Scientologist. So I continued the conversation, very subtly steering things closer and closer without them having a clue. And, YES, it turns out that once upon a time they were a Scientologist. Doing my dumb act (well-practiced, and quite compelling I might add, lol) I sort of mentioned in a dull-disoriented way that I had once heard about Scientology. (e.g. "Hey, wasn't that the religion that the guy who wrote Dianetics created?") Now the person I was chatting with got very interested in me for some reason, perhaps because they'd successfully identified a human who was willing to raptly listen to their shore stories? lol.
The conversation was further stealthily maneuvered into other archives (e.g. "Hey, I don't know if I am confusing this, but didn't I read a long, long time ago that Scientologists got in trouble with the US government or something?") This is where I learned that the person I was talking to had been a (proud) ranking member of the GO at that time. Of course, they had NO IDEA WHATSOEVER that I had been a Scientologist or that I already knew everything about that which I was asking (evil 1.1, right? lol).
So, having taken them into deep waters and noting that they were now "locked in" on handling me, I dropped the bomb: "Hey, I don't know if I remember this right (it was so long ago!) but decades ago, didn't I read a newspaper article saying that Hubbard's wife went to jail or whatever?") This is the precise point they pulled out their old GO bag of tricks and went to work--and their visage immediately transformed.
"No, no no, LOL. That was all so completely & incorrectly reported by the media!"
(ME): "But didn't she get convicted and go to federal prison?"
(Now the creepy fixed leering smirk erupted): "Oh, actually that wasn't the story at all. Mary Sue Hubbard's only "crime" was that she "borrowed some copy paper!"[SUP]* [/SUP](cue happy twinkling eyes with full-dial smirk). I watched their face intently for any sign of remorse or cringe for lying so blatantly. None. Just the "winning face" of a Scientologist applying their hoax-craft.
Although, as mentioned, I have seen this duping F/N face many times before, it was nonetheless quite surprising to see how that "borrowed some copy paper" line lit up their facial expression with the gloat of triumphant tech treachery.
I mention all this only because I see that exact same face in Rathbun's many videos. He is grinning and winning as he spews a stream of degenerate & despicable lies. Probably F/Ning too.
Did anyone have any other questions about the malicious mental illness known as Scientology?
[SUP]*[/SUP] Mary Sue Hubbard merely "borrowed some copy paper" : Pay no attention to what was the "biggest espionage raid in FBI history" that targeted the "largest infiltration ever vs. the US government". (You see, all that breaking and entering, espionage, robbery, grand theft and wide-scale spy network that penetrated US governmental buildings, agencies, files and computers---all that was just so that retrieve some data--so of course Mary Sue wanted that data "in writing", thus it was all so innocent that she mentioned to her spy network that it sure would be good if she could get some photocopies. And so, naturally, she needed some copy paper. Hey, people in offices in every city in the world make photocopies every single day, there's no crime here, move along. Anyways, I'm sure Mary Sue would be willing to replace the copy paper, no need to get all upset and launch into a witch-hunt!)
.

You are discussing Wordpress I assume.
Of course, as weak as my knowledge is in this area, I suppose just about any site can't be hacked and one of the tools for it is somehow raising(increase the depth) the level of control. Escalation I think it is called.
So legitimate or otherwise, and I think this has been mentioned before. who controls what shows on Marty's blog now.
I suppose even the history can be altered if high enough level of control is attained. So what we can see today might not be exactly as it was when first created.
Which reminds me when I got my first computer I had to go in and zero fill some sectors on a floppy to be able to reuse the space. It worked perfectly even though I learnt how to do it while reading in a language other than English, my only close to fluent one.
Maybe we can re-write history to exclude hubbard's birth using these virtual techniques. I might be worth the attempt.![]()

I LOVE THIS !![]()

I've already told you this s not true!
There is an organisation that would be delighted to forward,
invent, repost bad PR about Tony O.
You have not demonstrated that TO is COB. So put up
evidence she is or shut up!
It's like attending a funeral and looking around to see who's shown up; somebody's absence is more noticeable than their presenceAnother question. Did you happen to ask her why she hasn't posted at Marty's, on any of the new videos?

)
)[video]https://youtu.be/fH5iAFnzkCE[/video]
I'm doing a second post on Pt. 11, because Marty's review on Leah's segment about Paulette Cooper is an especially nutty ramble. He characterizes the episode as being a "mutual stroke fest" over "stuff" that went on, and it was stuff they were "tasked with abolishing," and that got "settled." No mention of what this stuff was.
Or, rather, he insinuates that Paulette's settlement was the result of an old story where Paulette Cooper "had a beef with Scientology and settled it." See folks? Cooper had a beef with Scientology and settled it. That's the whole story. Nothing to see here. Move on.
He doesn't mention the most basic things like Paulette Cooper wrote a book, or that Scientology framed her for making a bomb threat she didn't make. That's all part of the "stuff" that went on which is not worth mentioning, because it happened years ago.
Here are Marty's own words in Pt. 11, and the segments I'm leaving out do not clarify any of this:
The stuff she alleged, we were young men when we first got involved in handling this stuff. We were dealing with activities that we were tasked with abolishing, and did, at that time. And he's (Rinder) saying 37, 35 years later, "They will do this." And so it's this mutual stroke fest, this series which is degenerating progressively more and more into. So they're stroking Cooper for all this stuff she would settle satisfactorily 35 years ago, and acting as if Scientology will do those things now, right? With no predicate or basis.
It's this mutual stroke fest which is a creation on top of a creation. They're creating Paulette Cooper into something that exists in the present, and she's creating them as serving some useful purpose, and it's all just a creation of their imaginations.
Although it's getting caught up in his own jumble of words, Marty sounds like he said Paulette Cooper doesn't exist in the present. He is trying to deny that Paulette was followed and monitored by the cult years after she received a settlement, and with that he's suggesting the cult would never have anyone followed today, although he doesn't come out and say that. He just thinks his jumble of words will lead listeners to that conclusion.
Does Pat Broeker exist only in the past? Is Shelly Miscavige only in the past? How about L. Ron Hubbard, he in the past too, therefore not worth bringing up?
If Marty ever rambled this incomprehensibly when he was making an appearance on TV, being critical of either Miscavige or Hubbard, it was edited out.
I suppose that an analog for this series by Marty is the PR videos put out by Scientology where Scientologists enthuse about things, and often say total nonsense like, "I didn't know, but now I know." It's not about the content which matters, but you're supposed to catch the wave of enthusiasm and want to take that course or level to have your mind blown.
So the viewer of Marty's series is supposed to ride Marty's wave of critical thinking and knowingness concerning the critics of Scientology, which is bizarre because the cult has said he's a lunatic, which is backed up in part by this nonsensical ramble.
But I think it is an act. Marty is not imparting any "data." He's conveying a feeling and establishing a position. He is no longer a person who is going to criticize Scientology, Hubbard, or Miscavige, nor is he going to reflect critically on his own evolution or something as basic as what caused this shift in his thinking.

I think mawtee might be goofing the floof - maybe that is what he is looking at when he looks down.
(Am I allowed to say stuff like this?)
Karen pays for everybody to do everything and anything.
