It is a fact that Mike Rinder has never been restrained from exposing crimes by the "restraints of sponsored television".I neither commented on the subject matter of your OP or your comment on Bill's alleged hypocrisy. So you can continue to beat the strawman all day. It's still a logical fallacy.
Most of your postings consist of:
1) A strawman fallacy
2) A red herring fallacy
3) Accusations against others with zero evidence presented
4) Ad Hom fallacies
5) Cherry-picking data from social scientists that aligns with your narrative while ignoring data that contradicts your narrative.
6) a combination of the above.
Characterizing something that is at best your opinion as "factual information" is I'm sure another fallacy. Not sure the name of it this moment.
Show me one piece of "factual information" that I've characterized as a logical fallacy.
I can hear the answer already. It's:
Yet you've just demonstrated that you can't see that fact.