The basics of scientology such as the 8 dynamics, the ARC triangle, the tone scale - what may I ask do you find fault with that.
Just to jump in on this, which I missed before.
The 8 Dynamics are relatively arbitrary and tendentious 'categories' without any real world significance. As a taxonomy, they're a little silly, especially since Scientology only really concentrates on 1, 2, 3, 4 and *possibly* 8, with the other 3 of very little direct interest to the subject.
The ARC Triangle is *deliberately* false.
The 'Tone Scale' is, once again, arbitrary, random and deliberately tendentious both in what's included and the 'order' in which they're placed. The numerical quantifications are ludicrous and obviously only applied to suggest some kind of (non-existent) scientific rigor. There is no evidence for any real world significance to Ron's arbitrary continuum and the exercises and 'processes' based on the Tone Scale are demonstrably ineffective. (See PR Tech)
But, even more, those three elements of Scientology are *not* in any sense 'basic' to Scientology. If not them, it could be *anything*. The Five Glorps. The 20 Framistats. The Archie Comix. Ron could have *invented* any such 'system' of categories and pounded 'reality' into the square holes.
The *basis* of scientology is the premise that there is a 'natural state' called 'clear' that is 'unaberrated' and therefore full of *normal* godlike powers, and that Scientology practices can help one achieve this 'natural state'.
There is not only no evidence for this supposed 'Natural State' or its puported 'abilities', but even if there *were*, there is no evidence that Scientology practices could help in achieving them.
Remember; Scientology's premise is that all the godlike powers are *recovered* and, without alien implants and deliberate malicious 'suppression' would exist in all Thetans.
There is no evidence for *any* of the above.
Zinj