AnonKat
Crusader
pure
It is factual, look at himself his dishonesty trapped him
So he predicted his own dimise per that quote
It is factual, look at himself his dishonesty trapped him
So he predicted his own dimise per that quote
I have a new opinion about Freezoners
- Thread starter Emma
- Start date
AnonKat
Crusader
KSW was the death of Scientology
Mystic
Crusader
Tulpas, moonchild, conjured beings, do not have heart. Where in the world are you coming from? Some sort of twisted twistedness?
AnonKat
Crusader
Mystic
Crusader
AnonKat
Crusader
Veda
Sponsor
Miscavige didn't alter what Hubbard wrote nearly as much as some would like to think.
The LRH Hidden Data line (from this thread): http://forum.exscn.net/showpost.php?p=537081&postcount=494
Outline of Scientology, pre Miscavige: http://forum.exscn.net/showpost.php?p=463609&postcount=2
Veda
Sponsor
He of course instructed that one separate his opinions from his
tech or data.
Got reasonably good at that.
Afraid I go by my own opinions.
Me suppressive? Fuck you.
Here I can't comment further. Its a good thought though.
Is Hubbard's instruction, that one separate his opinions from his tech or data, his opinion? or is it his tech or data?
Is "This is a cold blooded and factual account of your last sixty trillion years," Hubbard's opinion or is it his tech or data?
Is the SP doctrine (which apparently you take quite seriously) Hubbard's opinion or is it his tech or data?
Can you not see that when Hubbard said that his opinions are not his tech or data, and that his tech or data are FACT and not his opinions, that that was a sneaky way of making his tech or data unchallengeable in the minds of his followers?
I guess not...
Clueless Morgan
Patron with Honors
Thank you.
I mean, you can use condoms, not go to church, not pay church tax, and still consider yourself a Catholic...the somewhat antiquated but sadly omnipresent view on religion is that, in order to label yourself as something, you have to agree with it completely and harbor absolutely no criticism on it at all. Or maybe it's just an idea that's left over from Scientology's indoctrination. Who knows. Nevertheless, it's complete BS. There's something called free will. And, say I want to believe in the Catholic theories on why things are the way they are, but I still want to use birth control, then why can't I call myself Catholic?
I honestly find it disturbing how modern society is so uptight with labelling everything. Maybe I don't want to be labelled as something, maybe I do, but in the end it's up to me to decide, within reason. I can't go around calling myself a Hindu but believing there is no such thing as Gods, obviously, but minor discrepancies with the doctrine of the religion should be alright. Also, most of Hubbard's evil policies were in fact organisatorial in nature, and had nothing to do with the beliefs per se. So if we filter out the random cr** that would make us into complete douchebags, we're left with something that can't really hurt us or others. It may, in some people's view, be a time-waster, but then again there are people who go to Star Trek conventions and build model starships. Or as a less abstract example, go to the movies and drink at bars.
Fun is in the eye of the beholder and as long as you're having fun and not hurting yourself or others, there can't be anything wrong with it.
Voltaire's Child
Fool on the Hill
Must be something dutch We dutch teach our cats to use them to sharpen their nails
Ah. Well, I have some very nice sisal scratching boards for them, and they do scratch there, but they're so willful that they do lots of other things.
I'm pretty sure they're actually demons.
Infinite
Troublesome Internet Fringe Dweller
Bullshit. Hubbard's original premise was to make money, then make more money. The "institution" solidified around that precept.
Voltaire's Child
Fool on the Hill
I was still kinda hoping to hear moar about how military background equates into non Scn brilliance and how my husband's own brilliance, military background AND current interest in the Freezone figures into that...Oh well, I guess it was a cut and run type thing. Move along, nothing to see here.
AnonKat
Crusader
means
actually
"Foolishly perhaps, but determined nonetheless, I have high hopes of smashing my name into history so violently that it will take a legendary form even if all the books are destroyed."
-L Ron Hubbard.
http://forums.whyweprotest.net/threads/research-request.35679/#post-759866
actually
"Foolishly perhaps, but determined nonetheless, I have high hopes of smashing my name into history so violently that it will take a legendary form even if all the books are destroyed."
-L Ron Hubbard.
http://forums.whyweprotest.net/threads/research-request.35679/#post-759866
TG1
Angelic Poster
The name of the game: I'm bona fide, and you're not.
I'm a patriot, and you're not.
I'm an Aryan, and you're not.
My hair is straight, and yours is not.
I was born in America, but you weren't.
We live on the right side of the tracks, and you don't.
My forebears came over on the Mayflower, and yours didn't.
I went to Harvard, and you didn't.
I wear designer clothes, and you don't.
I'm a Cowboys fan, and you're not.
I'm a Republican / Democrat / whatever, and you're not.
Who cares! This is so third-grade it's elementary.
(Get it, yuck, yuck?!)
I'm a patriot, and you're not.
I'm an Aryan, and you're not.
My hair is straight, and yours is not.
I was born in America, but you weren't.
We live on the right side of the tracks, and you don't.
My forebears came over on the Mayflower, and yours didn't.
I went to Harvard, and you didn't.
I wear designer clothes, and you don't.
I'm a Cowboys fan, and you're not.
I'm a Republican / Democrat / whatever, and you're not.
Who cares! This is so third-grade it's elementary.
(Get it, yuck, yuck?!)
Clueless Morgan
Patron with Honors
Are you by any chance this guy from Boston Legal?
Royal Prince Xenu
Trust the Psi Corps.
These photos are just "play"...
Attachments
Voltaire's Child
Fool on the Hill
Similar threads
