No, "Clarence," I'd say the truth is you never got to know her . . . . you see, Yvonne, was one of those high-powered classy, very perceptive people who saw very correctly several things: a) correct orders of importance, b) how to best get the job done, c) was a truly great leader and manager of people and, of equal importance, d) she was colossally perceptive regarding others and thus did not suffer fools gladly . . . or at all.
So fools had a rather tough time around her . . . she didn't let them too near her (a wise and sane move) and she sure as hell knew how to keep them from destroying her lines and the things she saw of value.
She also colossally helped many, many people. And was a truly kind person.
I knew Yvonne in Melbourne in the quite early '60's when she ran the $cn Franchise there . . . she was responsible for booming Melbourne $cn and feeding what became the Org . . . she helped many, and is and was beloved by many.
That person in the photo with her I commented on, Wally B, is an old PC of mine from Melbourne.
So I know these cats, and know them well, and know their values and merits and worth.
And one thing we need to respect as a fact of life, whether in $cn (where it is applied rather too viciously) the business world or the military . . . in all these places where performance or indeed lives are at stake . . . the executive class are required to be rather severe in dealing with the idiot class, the trouble-makers and the deadbeats.
So, all I have to say is that anyone who had "trouble" "from" Yvonne shouldn't be blaming Yvonne nor calling her names but looking to see what about themselves was found to be unacceptable to that stellar person.
Your stats in no way match hers as to worth or value . . . . so one can only conclude the fault is not in her or in her stars, but in you and yours. And this is exemplified, as Magoo pointed out later . . . . by the generalities you used.
The truth is, while you may have met her, you didn't know the lady. And she was a great lady and great person . . . . and is deserved of the love and honor so many other great people give her, as shown here on this thread.
So, if you had "trouble" in her presenceI can tell you, you are among the very rare, and of a variety who may well be a magnet to it from other sources as well. Tough.
So "Clarence" you are the odd man out . . . . go figure on that.
RogerB
Thank you for this post, Roger.
You summed up very nicely the central reasons why, as of more than 30 years ago, I refuse to support in any way "scientology" or anything like it:
Never dare to deviate from the accepted party line (if you do, and have trouble because of it, why of course that means there is something WRONG with YOU...); "reality" (truth) is consensus (agreement); never question or criticize anyone the "executive class" considers to be "upstat," and all the other bs.
I can tell you, you are among the very rare, and of a variety who may well be a magnet to it from other sources as well. Tough.

I appreciated the way they put it together, with hardly any money, with the carpet samples and all. And the place always seemed alive with artists of all kinds. It was a charming place to me. The only reason I left was because the service was bad. I went over to ASHO and got good service, but there was no artistic charm there.

