On Martys latest post:
https://markrathbun.blog/2017/12/17/leah-remini-and-mike-rinder/#comments
Alanzo makes a comment to Don:
"
Actually, Don, the overwhelming majority of Scientologists never harmed or abused anyone, and never would. They were not in the Sea Org, and they especially were not at Int Base.
But the idea that having been a Scientologist makes you some kind of a criminal with a leprous social disease is simply not true for the overwhelming majority of those who ever got themselves involved in Scientology.
Anti-Scientology is being run right now by the very people who were the most abusive people in Scientology. It’s a pretty bizarre situation, but you can tell because the hysteria from anti-Scientologists is at about the same fever pitch as the hysteria around Scientology when these people were running things from the Sea Org and Int Base.
Too few of them have even stopped to take a breath and spotted that they are using the same Sea Org mentality as anti-Scientologists as when they were fanatical Sea Org members.
Alanzo"
Here's my rebuttal since I do not wish to post on Alanzo blog nor Marty blog, both are sort of rhetoric Junto Clubs, in their own right to free speech.
Anyways, Alanzo's first sentence:
"Actually, Don, the overwhelming majority of Scientologists never harmed or abused anyone, and never would. They were not in the Sea Org, and they especially were not at Int Base."
My reply, yes that is true per se, but they were taught how to persuade people.
Alanzo second second sentence:
"But the idea that having been a Scientologist makes you some kind of a criminal with a leprous social disease is simply not true for the overwhelming majority of those who ever got themselves involved in Scientology."
My answer, I don't think the idea of having been a scientologist is what is being communicated in the blogs, what is is actually being communicated is that Dianetics and Scientology are criminal organizations and it's front groups because those organizations are supposed to produce a "clear" and then "OT", per it's own so called HCOB's & HCOPL's.
Alanzo third paragraph:
"Anti-Scientology is being run right now by the very people who were the most abusive people in Scientology. It’s a pretty bizarre situation, but you can tell because the hysteria from anti-Scientologists is at about the same fever pitch as the hysteria around Scientology when these people were running things from the Sea Org and Int Base."
My answer, I don't think anti-scientology is being run by anybody, in fact it's being run by all those that speak their minds regarding dianetics and scientology, what is occurring is that exmembers are telling their stories of having been involved, and the general public are being to understand because of exmembers telling their stories of getting involved.
Alanzo forth paragraph:
"Too few of them have even stopped to take a breath and spotted that they are using the same Sea Org mentality as anti-Scientologists as when they were fanatical Sea Org members."
My answer:
Why on earth would Alanzo state such? And I don't have a clue, but
Of course they are using the same techniques that Hubbard used to get one in involved in Dianetics and Scientoloy. That's rhetoric, the art of persuasion, and it's 3 means of logos, pathos, ethos.
Hopefully, as logic dictates, one will ask the question where are the "clears" and where are the "OT's"?
The world really needs Hubbard's HCO PL's and HCOB's and recorded lectures to survive, don't you think Alanzo?
