Free to shine
Shiny & Free
Excellent comments and overviews:
http://tonyortega.org/2015/01/23/vi...ion-his-liability-formula/#comment-1813564114J. Swift • 3 hours ago
Deixler pushing Rathbun to read an internal Liability Formula -- which is ecclesiastical in nature -- is proof that the Church uses privileged ecclesiastical folders against former members. This is inherently Fair Game and an egregious violation of what the David Miscavige, Mark Rathbun, Monique Yingling, and other CSI lawyers told the IRS in order to gain tax exemption.
Diexler proves in this deposition that Fair Game was not cancelled and that the Church uses privileged ecclesiastical folders against former members. Miscavige caused and allowed this privileged ecclesiastical letter between himself and Rathbun to be introduced into a legal hearing, thus proving he runs CSI. I say this because Miscavige would have had to tell Church lawyers about this letter because it was a personal priest-penitent letter to him from Rathbun and would have been located in Rathbun's privileged parishioner folders.
In attempting to establish a foundation, Deixler allows Rathbun to discuss tax exemption thus opening the door to this question: If what Mark Rathbun said in a 1993 letter was untrue, then was what Mark Rathbun told the IRS in pursuit of tax exemption also untrue?
Deixler's attempt to impeach Rathbun goes to impeaching the truthfulness of the Church's tax exemption as well -- and this could become a matter for a Grand Jury or DOJ probe.
Deixler and Miscavige can't have it only one way: Attacking Rathbun is attacking tax exemption is attacking Miscavige.
http://tonyortega.org/2015/01/23/vi...ion-his-liability-formula/#comment-1813378858Graham Berry • 5 hours ago
This is a very interesting deposition extract from my perspective. There are some very interesting statements on the 1993 Scientology-IRS secret tax exempt status agreement. For some reason Rathbun, after that event in 1993, had left ("blown") the Sea Organization despite this accomplishment and had been recovered (recaptured).
At 020, Marty testifies that, in essence, per Hubbard policy, "The job of legal is not to make the organization comply with the law. The job of legal is to make the law comply with the organization. This is day to day life in the legal department of Scientology."
At 13:08, Marty testifies that Miscavige said to him, in essence: "The IRS exemption never would have happened absent you. You are the guy that made it happen. And you are a Kha Khan. You can commit murder ten times and you are forgiven."
At 13:57, Marty testifies that "Williams & Connelly" [the DC powerhouse law firm with Gerry Feffer, Esq.] had
screwed the whole thing up. That's what caused Miscavige and me to go in there."
If only Marty would bare his memory, soul and conscience about every aspect and detail of Scientology's "War against the IRS," and the meetings with the IRS Commissioner, then David Miscavige's reign of terror and abuse could be ended.
How did Marty "make it [the IRS exemption] happen?" I believe that an accurate and comprehensive response
would be the church's Waterloo. It would probably lose the status, have to reform, and pay a penalty, before
recovering the status.
http://tonyortega.org/2015/01/23/vi...ion-his-liability-formula/#comment-1813562473Betsy Graham Berry • 3 hours ago
In one of Jeffrey Augustine's podcasts (can't remember which, sorry) he goes into some detail about the non-Co$ lawyers who were involved in things like the tax-exemption scam. He actually recited a list of names. I was sorry Marty didn't know about or didn't recall them, because I think the depositioner was trying to make Marty seem like an ignorant messer-upper, as he tried to do in the first part when Marty said that he was head of the legal division and was asked "Were you a lawyer, sir? Did you graduate from college?" Can't quite figure out what the point of this is...maybe to imply that any illegalities or untruths about the tax status are Marty's fault for handling legal problems as an uneducated person? (Obviously a lot of what this is about has NOTHING to do with the Garcia case, but is intended to make Marty look like a liar and jerk so that any testimony he gives about Chorch justice proceedings will be discounted.)
I'm a bit mystified, though, by the venomous quality of this deposition...it's almost as though the lawyer is just a mouthpiece for Miscavige. Anyone out there who knows about these things who might shed some light on this?
I was also puzzled by the lawyer's insistence on getting Marty to say that his claim that DM was a friend was a lie. Many people consider others friends and later change their minds.