RogerB
Crusader
. . . Snipped . . .
It's one of those moving target deals: on grd 4 you audit the ser facs that generate the person's pt GPM, on power you key gpms out and more of the same with r6ew - then you are off the person's own GPMs and into implant GPMs on CC and OT 2 which he said were only a small part of the GPM bank, then you are off on to BTs stuck in implant GPMs on OT3, then you are off onto "dead" bts on ot 5, 6, 7, and BT's are just GE's (genetic entities) from the late 50's which were the demon circuits of the early 50's. So maybe it will go full circle on OT 9 & 10 and be back onto the pc's own GPMs
Mimsey
Your whole post is good, Mims . . . particularly the part above.
He did unceremoniously abandon own goal GPMs, as I have posted on before.
And he never did return to them.
Alan posited that Hubbard never really did want to produce OTs and on a number of occasions sabotaged tech that was relatively on target.
But, as to why and on what the meter reads on
. . . it happens I posted on this subject over on http://knowledgism-practice-group.org just a few days ago. This also parallels stuff I am currently studying/using in he realm of the "Body electric."This below is an excerpt from a reference to an advanced medical tech conference I am part of later this year.
We have micro-current therapy (SCENAR etc.), which can INSTANTLY turn off pain, inflammation and cellular dysfunction. Symptoms and diseases can disappear in minutes.... Yes, minutes.
Example: I have been able to get a case blue-grey with pneumonia and difficulty breathing back to totally normal within 15 minutes. (and she remained well thereafter)
We have intra-nasal light therapy, which does more to prevent stroke and heart disease than statins or any other method of controlling blood fats (which are just stuff, anyway).
We have devices that can pick out the energetic signal of a disease you had half a century ago and neutralize it.
We find that the energetic or "information" signature of a substance may be what produces change, not the biochemical substance at all!
This is a vast new wave of medicine, that started several decades ago but has now burst into the limelight, with a whole new wave of physics to back it up (physics which, incidentally, suggest that orthodox medicine is wasting its time!)
I have collected all I know and annotated it down to a book I recently published, called Medicine Beyond. That's because it's beyond the limiting boundaries of stuck-in-time science (most of it is still in the 19[SUP]th[/SUP] century, never mind the 20[SUP]th[/SUP] century).
I was recently surprised when reading the book "Current Medicine" by Drs. John Hache & Lottaine Hache, that the fascia of the body (it's the connective tissue and collagen based) is piezoelectric, and when stressed produces electrical charge and electrons.
In fact, I know a number here are interested in these aspects of the human body, and I've had it on my mind when I get more info, to scan the relevant pages of the book to post them as attachments.
Getting this info in the last month has given me a whole new understanding of what is going on vis-a-vis the body . . . and as a result of some further research I wrote this piece below on the Knowledgism forum site. This is the first part/half (the forum limits posts to 20,000 characters including spaces).
Err, also to be noted is that Hubbard (and his predecessors) did screw up on the notion of the "mind."
READING AND USING THE METER
Note that header has two parts: a) Reading and, b) Using, the meter.
As I wrote in an earlier dictum . . . meter reading is simple. The needle reacts or it does not react. That is really all you need to know.
And what is an actual "reaction" or "read"? It is the existing current action of needle movement or pattern of movement and/or the Resistance Value (Tone Arm position) being caused to change . . . that is, any change that occurs in response to what goes on in the client's universe or "mind." More on this later.
And there is a basis behind why it "reads" or reacts, and that basis is this.
First is an understanding of what "Charge" is. It is a word that has been thrown about for ages, but often not understood, either in the human betterment arena or in some areas of science. Indeed, even Science cannot define or state definitively what energy actually is; what it the "stuff" of it. In physics, the greatest science minds of the ages have only come up with the definition of energy as being: "capacity for doing work." Nowhere is it revealed what is the stuff of it or of what it is composed or comprised of.
And I refer you to this point on "energy" because "energy" has everything to do with what "charge" is.
If a spiritual Presence is operating perfectly and in harmony with all it relates with, its flows and reciprocation of spiritual Life-Force, simply flow as directed and are in exchange but do not hang up.
My personal definition of "energy" is, at its basic and beginning is: directed spiritual Life-Force that may have been formed or not. In Knowledgism, you'll see different names used to convey the notion of what it is we Beings use in our exchanges with each other: . . . Alan often refers to "Spirita" (Scn folks use the word "Theta") and he often refers to "Life-Force particles" and also "Attention units or bits."
He also mentions that this stuff is of us ourselves . . . thus that which is projected can be a part of ourself, our actual Being.
To be observed is the point that, when all is harmonious and in alignment, there are no hang-ups and the Life-Force simply flows. This is seen on a meter as a Floating Needle (FN).
When there is (an event or occasion of) disharmony, conflict, pain, unwanted and resisted or opposed sensation or experience, then, the spiritual Life-Force jams and becomes encysted.
And it is these "standing waves" of jammed and encysted Life-Force that form the "charge" we refer to that has to be unlocked and set freely flowing and restored to being under our knowing control again.
We have two definitions of "Charge" in Knowledgism. 1) Accumulated energy. And, as it happens that is precisely one of the definitions in regular and science dictionaries. Thus it is to be noted that encysted spiritual Life-Force is a matter of accumulating/ed energy! The second definition we have is: #2) Negative spiritual Life-Force that is out of our control and is unknown to the individual. Thus, here too the "energy accumulates."
Thus, what makes the meter react, is when our live spiritual awareness or attention touches any such accumulated standing wave of encysted spiritual Life-Force (an area of accumulated energy) and that encysted Life-Force to varying degrees revivifies (comes alive) or discharges to the degree it is permeated or otherwise activated.
The needle reaction pattern is variable, depending on the nature and content of what is activated or otherwise how much quanta of accumulated energy is released.
And that is the simplicity of it.
Next, one has the datum of when it reacts . . . it reacts when the spiritual Being contacts a part of existence that is charged.
And here we have the next simplicity . . . the judgment of whether the meter read/reaction is something to follow-up on or not.
Diving around following up random reads cum meter needle reactions is a very bad idea. That is the way to get yourself scattered all over the universes with "too many windows open."
You'll have heard chatter about "latent reads" and "prior reads" . . . well, that is a little too simplistic also.
Correct processing follows a precise "formula."
In session, the action of running a process consists of: a) asking the client a question they understand and can answer, b) allowing the question or command to either trigger an answer or response or otherwise to allow the client to search for and find the answer, c) allowing the client to fully inspect what comes to view or is otherwise found and, d) letting the client fully relate to you what has been found and to fully discharge the charge present and restore any negativity to positive.
Formal sessions should always be conducted with an understanding of what subject or area of case or process is going to be addressed. And it is this that determines what needle action/reactions are followed up on.
Once the session has formally begun and the subject or case area is known and agreed upon with the client, it can happen that the client's attention will automatically go to the important issues to be handled and "random" meter reactions can occur simply because the client "thinks thoughts" or that his/her attention drifts to hot areas to handle.
If you are in session and "random reads/reactions" occur . . . check in on it. Use a question like: "Got your attention on something there?" or "Something come to view there?" You and client will both know the correct response J
The issue of "Prior" or "Latent" meter reads/reactions really is only an issue when you are using the meter to find something specific, such as in the case of doing a Correction List to handle By-Passed Charge or a sour session or, using an Assessment List such as the Knowledgism Upset-Setup Assessment to find the source and cause of upset to the prior named and known setup. (Note this R/D requires one find and make known the prior POSITVE which area of existence is then assessed to find the Negative that knocked out the Positive.)
In this case the needle/meter reaction considered to be valid is that reaction that occurs at the exact instant the client "gets" the question . . . but you can be fooled by this dictum as laid down by "some practices." Experienced and trained processors when in session, either solo or when being processed by another can "get" the question before it is delivered (fully) by the processor because they know what the question is going to be. Thus, such a "random" read should be checked as above: "Anything come to view?" or "Something come to view for you?" "Something you've got your attention on, of thought a thought there?"
Similarly, a "latent" read may be valid because it sometimes happens that the client is a little slow in truly getting the question . . . and the meter reads when he does get it. Thus, again, you check: "You think something there?"
Here you take the client's answer . . . the client is ALWAYS SENIOR TO THE METER.
I know of many folks who've been mightily screwed up in a former practice because the processor refused to take the client truth/data and insisted on asserting what the meter was "saying."
Here is a true story example. This guy went to the ranch some years ago because, as a salesman, he was wanting to improve his performance and increase income. He was utterly new to this kind of thing, and this was his first experience of processing. The idiot in charge of tech delivery put him in session with a total rookie processor, actually a student just joined staff. The selected process was one of the "Trust List Processes." It's an assessment list to locate any and all societal or behavioral violations that could cause a Being to be withdrawn or secretive and to thus not be in full possession of powers and ability to communicate and influence the environment. Some here from a former practice will remember the infamous Johannesburg Security Check (Jo'Burg Sec Check).
What a destructive action that was . . . the Case Supervisor, without interviewing the client assumed the new guy had violations that had to be first cleaned up! Personally, I'd have had him address some positive ability and restoration of powers processes like "Dones and Restraints" on money, selling and such and "Responsibility" in the area . . . and if any indications of nasty stuff came up to then prepare a violations handling on the subject he came in to have handled!
Apart from the whole silly parade being unreal to the new client . . . and that was bad enough . . . when the question, "Have you ever had sex with animals?" was asked, the meter reacted so violently it nearly fell of the table. And here is where the rooky processor did the damage. Seeing the meter reaction she "intently" followed up and persisted with accusations that there was something "there" as the meter reacted on the question.
Well, yes, it did. The meter will react on and because of several things: protest, disagreement, a non/not-understood, a misunderstanding and even a mental action by the client of the thinking of "what an idiot!" "What the F*** is she on about!" Newly originated client thought and/or intended intentions all read on the meter. In actuality, the meter reacted because of a compound of reasons . . . not only was the client offended by the question, as it was, along with the general session action not on his interest line or on what he'd come to have handled, he didn't understand WTF*** this was all about . . . .and all this on top of the fact that the sweet girl rooky was actually not able to be fully present with the client due to her own newbie raw case state!
The processor cannot assume the meter reaction is on what he/she might expect. You don't tell the client what is, YOU ASK! "Something on that?" And let the client get it off to you.
I don't expect to have to be coaching you guys on how to handle dishonest clients who have known to them violations they are keeping secret . . . personally, I simply give them a little advice and if they do not take it, then they are off my lines!
Clients need to understand that for as long as they are withholding truth and hiding the fullness of themselves and not being fully willing to be permeated and fully "duplicated" and known, then they are sabotaging themselves and keeping themselves withdrawn, small and disempowered. They will be drastically out of communication and not able to control their environment as they should be able to.
Sometimes an honest client cannot "get all" because it's still a little buried, or otherwise "the all" was gotten, gone past and missed, and the expected meter manifestation of the FN is not seen. Again one does NOT badger the client and accuse them of "not coming clean" or some other destructive nonsense as occurs in a cult some here witnessed. You sort out why the "expected" meter action has not occurred and handle.
Now for some "complexity" . . .
VARIATIONS ON METER ACTION AND NEEDLE REACTIONS.
This continues on the next post as I am exceeding the allowed 20,000 (characters including spaces!!) limit per post
