Gadfly,
I enjoy your posts quite a lot!
You often provide large quantities of information, artfully mixed with considerable servings of tasty opinions and juicy thoughts!!!
And here you bring up the main reason that makes me visit this forum (I've been reading for months)
I've been trying to figure out why people, more often than not, willingly give up their freedoms and abolish reason when joining Scientology?
The notion of "bridge to total freedom" implies that at this moment I'm not 'free' since I haven't even seen that bridge. If I were to accept that the bridge exists then I must also consider that the good folks in Scientology are only helping me get closer to "total freedom", without actually hurting my freedom, since 'freedom' is something that I don't currently have (direct consequence of accepting that there is such a thing as "bridge to total freedom") ... This entire proposition, as illogical as it is, seems to set up one of the emotional traps that precondition a person for accepting abusive environment, and eventually condoning irrational behavior.
Anyway,
Thank you again!!M
In one regard, though obviously not all, Scientololgy is no different than any other "betterment" program in that the ONLY people who get attracted to such things, whether a self-help group, rehab center, or spiritual practice, are people who feel that
something is wrong or missing in their lives and that such a group will help "solve that problem".
"Spiritual freedom" has been a MAJOR "button" for a certain segment of people all throughout history. Whether calling this "salvation", "enlightenment", "union with God" or "cosmic consciousness", certain people HAVE always been attracted to such subjects.
Also, "sacrifice", for whatever reason, has often been attached to the notion of "personal betterment and advancement". From the buddhist monk with a wooden bowl and who has given up all "earthly desires" to the crazed Christian zealot flagellating himself to help remind himself of the flaws of the "material body".
But, I think when it comes to "abolishing reason" and "abandoning freedoms" there is something more basic going on. It seems to me that too many people are happy to "give up freedom for security". THAT is the basic on all of this. This has happened in political and economic realms all throughout history. In Scientology, it is a combination of THAT while also having agreed with Hubbard's nutty delineation of Man's sorry state on Earth and in this Universe, and how and why ONLY SCIENTOLOGY can "properly address" and "handle this". See, people who BELIEVE things are how Hubbard describes them to be and who also BELIEVE that Scientology can "solve these problems", feel VERY SECURE about their choices here. They are "certain". They "believe". "Security" goes hand in hand with a high degree of "belief". It isn't necessarily "real security", but the believer often feels it once having "completely accepted the faith of my perfect path to salvation".
Part of it is that some "authority" (Hubbard) has "figured it all out" and has "handed the truth down" (like God did via Moses). This sets it up so that there are almost always viewpoints, Hubbard's and management's, that are "senior", "better" or "more valid" than YOURS.
One learns to "sacrifice" one's personal viewpoint for Hubbard's and management's.
There is also the aspect of "putting aside personal concerns for a greater cause". There is no doubt that such things have occurred throughout history, and Hubbard set up Scientology to really HIT that button HARD. What does one put aside? Personal concerns, freedoms and even reason.
For example, in various forms of communism and fascism it is common to hear the slogan that "one works for the PARTY". The "party" is all, and the individual is nothing. Your value and worth are determined ONLY in how well you SERVE THE GROUP. The SAME aspect of "willingly give up their freedoms and abolishing reason" occurs in these too. I think that this behavior would need to be examined across ALL forms of totalitarianism, and I have only taken a quick cursory look here. There is no doubt that in Scientology the majority of any concepts of VALUE and WORTH (i.e. upstat, in-ethics) hinge on "contributing to Scientology". Didn't Hubbard say in KSW #1 that "it is the bank that makes the group all and the individual nothing"? Well, also, in Scientology, it is Hubbard's philosophy that makes group all and the individual nothing!
Also, there can be decent and worthwhile groups where it is not necessarily such a "bad thing" to give up a little "exaggerated personal attention" (ego, self-gratification, fixation on "me") and to work towards helping the group achieve its aims. Groups don't have to suck.
Lastly, the obliteration of "reason" occurs partially due to "cognitive dissonance". Once one has accepted ANY "package of beliefs" that tends toward inner contradictions and contradictions
with reality, whether Stalin's communism, some form of fantaical Christianity
or Scientology, the BELIEVER acts mentally to force ALL reality and ALL ideas to CONFORM with his package of beliefs. Reason gets left in the dust to enable "consistency" with the
fixed ideas of the belief system.
A simply answer is that people give up freedom in certain ways because they believe, correctly or incorrectly, that in the end, it will "pay off". I doubt it ever does. Now, sacrificing some current "pleasures" or "desires" MAY result in a "better tomorrow". It depends though on the context, and Scientology is NOT one of them.