OK so is your point now that a person could be on staff in a class 5 org and make enough money to survive?Oh. Yeah, that makes sense. Busy guy.
The Moonlighting PL was taken out of the last series of green vols, by the way. Before the green vols disappeared altogether.
OK so is your point now that a person could be on staff in a class 5 org and make enough money to survive?
That because this guy has a wog job he could NOT have been the EO STL for 10 years?
That any staff member is not a "busy guy" working two jobs?
Lulu's disinformation and obfuscation campaigns continue.
He is still living in the same city as the rest of his family and is in touch with them -and the ED of the STL org Chad Lane - at least on social media.
He's not "in hiding".
Neither you nor I - or anyone else but Kevin - knows if he is "out".
Except for this
View attachment 15842
I actually do know the real identity of "Out-Ethics".OK. So, do you know the deal with this guy? This LinkedIn profile is definitely him. Looks like he's had a regular IT job for the last eight plus years.
Doesn't sound like he's even on staff.
Bullshit.Oh, for christ's sake, Alanzo, it was just a mild comment that DIDN'T HAVE A POINT.
Why does "busy guy" have to mean a laundry list of innuendo and accusations?
You must be something at cocktail parties.
"Hi, Alanzo, how's it going?"
"WHAT ARE YOU INSINUATING? THAT I'M NOT WELL? THAT I'M GOING SOMEWHERE?"
This is an interesting observation. I haven't been aware of this but then maybe I'm not connected to any "antis". Could you explain, from your experience, who are the "antis" and where do they post their "die-hard churchy-like" rants. I actually am interested.I would suggest you spend more effort trying to understand what Alanzo is saying than trying to put him down. Then you might understand.
There is no requirement in understanding someone that you agree with them!
His points about antis acting in a very similar manner as die hard churchies, is fairly plain to me.
Who said anything about "Out Ethics"?I actually do know the real identity of "Out-Ethics".
It's NOT who Alanzo is claiming him to be, and he is the farthest thing from an OSA operative that one can be.
But Alanzo's attempt to out another member of ESMB is pretty disgusting in my book. Something that would have caused possibly a permanent ban had he done it during almost the entire time that ESMB existed.
But now it's just "free speech".
If it had been done to Alanzo, Emma would have a stroke over it, but it's totally fine now because Out-Ethics pissed her off.
Bullshit.
You have a passive-aggressive point to everything you write lately.
Did I answer your fucking questions?
You mean characterizing how I would react to the question "How are you?" at a cocktail party?OK. I give up.
I thought maybe we could have sort of normal back and forth human chit chat, but I guess that's not happening.
Not that you ever listen to anyone about anything, least of all me, but, not everything is part of a crusade.
And acting like it does doesn't play well in real life.
Both you and Tom Padgett did earlier in the thread.Who said anything about "Out Ethics"?
I updated the thread on OSA Operatives.
What are you doing?
You are lying.Both you and Tom Padgett did earlier in the thread.