Free to shine
Shiny & Free
There is a disucssion on this today, Marty says:
http://markrathbun.wordpress.com/2011/10/27/scientologys-new-international-spokesperson/#comments
There are too many comments to paste in here, you'll have to wade through them, sorry. Here's one:
http://markrathbun.wordpress.com/2011/10/27/scientologys-new-international-spokesperson/#comments
martyrathbun09 | October 27, 2011 at 3:43 pm |
I think Professor Frank Flynn got it right in the seventies: Scientology is technological Buddhism.
There are too many comments to paste in here, you'll have to wade through them, sorry. Here's one:
Kassapa | October 27, 2011 at 9:07 pm |
George,
As a fellow Buddhist, as well as a Scientologist, let me clear up for you a huge misunderstanding people have about Gotama’s doctrine of no-self. The “self” that one gets rid of in Buddhism is not the thetan as an awareness-of-awareness unit. It is all the valences, both self-created and otherwise accumulated, that Scientology addresses and removes. If Gotama were alive today as a human being, he would become a Scientologist in a heartbeat. The only reason he avoided the issue of personal survival after body death was to force his followers to confront and as-is their dependence on whatever valence they had chosen to wear. In this lifetime, my own enlightenment experience came after 3 weeks of continuous, obsessive concentration on the following koan: “How could existence possibly exist? How could existence possibly not exist? How could I possibly exist? How could I possibly not exist?” The explosive, life-changing experience that resulted from this meditation fully answered those questions, and DID include personal spiritual immortality. Nibanna means cessation, but what ceases is not one’s personal existence, but one’s creation of the false selves (valences) that comprise one’s case. This may not be stated in the Pali Canon you quote, but that canon was not written by Gotama, as India had no written language at that time. The Canon was passed on by word of mouth for several generations before being written down, which was long enough for it to be altered. Also, your Theraveda school, while entirely valid, is based only on Gotama early teachings. He went on to teach the Mahayana and the Vajrayana technologies. The Vajrayana became the basis of Tibetan Buddhism, which very definitely includes the concepts of personal spiritual immortality and reincarnation. The idea that Scientology is technological Buddhism is entirely correct.