Dulloldfart
Squirrel Extraordinaire
Paul, What makes you think that I have to answer any of your questions?
Sorry, I thought you were trying to stop being an asshole. Guess not.
Paul
Paul, What makes you think that I have to answer any of your questions?
Just the other day, you used an image taken from $cientology's propaganda data base in a post, so you must not be completely off put by all thing OSA.
Sorry, I thought you were trying to stop being an asshole. Guess not.Paul
Paul, you're being unfair. I answered your question and you just didn't accept my answer. Now you call me names.
-snip-
Back in the ARS days, my anger was mainly directed at the church of Scientology.
-snip-
What's happened? Has the earlier person got to the end of his shift and been replaced with the old Toothie we all know?
Paul
I have no idea what you talking about. What data are you referring to?
Please be specific.
Wow. Thanks for being honest.
It was a list compiled by the OSA ARS handling team.But at the time, I firmly believe that they did belong on that list.
In my opinion, Arnie Lerma may be a little weird, but I don’t think he’s OSA. There’s also Joe Lynn, aka “Zinj” but I’m still not sure about that guy but my current consensus is that he’s not OSA just has an active imagination and needs to get a life.
Nonsense. They were pointing out that he was lying. No one believed Truthseeker was 'mistaken' and I'd suppose no ARS regular does to this day. Clue: he never answered any attempt to reason with him.they were forwarding OSA’s agenda against me and were behaving like OSA. They were PTS to OSA and were assisting OSA’s even if they didn’t realize it.
More slime. There were disagreements, dramas and long running flame wars on ARS, but OSA obvious attempts to encourage this were obvious. There are, still, some ARS posters I don't communicate with, but OSA pawns they are not.OSA seemed to be good at making pawns out of others to do their dirty work and ARS had its share
A standard Truthseeker line, and untrue. Only a few critics in those days were being seriously harassed by the Church. No one in the UK ever was for example.To be publicly against the church of scientology in the 90’s and early 2000’s was a very risky thing to do, a lot riskier than it is now.
The purpose was to slime her.The purpose of the blog was to get her to see some of the outnesses of her life and to protect the public’s interest.
Sorry, I thought you were trying to stop being an asshole. Guess not.
Paul
What's happened? Has the earlier person got to the end of his shift and been replaced with the old Toothie we all know?
Paul
Looks like the "honest" phase is over. Guess you can ban him now, Ems.
Paul
Truth Seeker View profile More options Jun 21 2004, 1:22 pm On 20 Jun 2004 14:16:11 GMT, pbn...@aol.comNospam (Memorychipbroken)
wrote:
>>truthpuker just cuts and past the same old, same old
>>he never comes up with sane post, never joins in a thread
>>unless its to spam, never suggests sites to check out,
>>geee I wonder why that is ?
>>actually his posts just make him/her look like a dam idiot,
>>nothing to offer, but babble
>I am waiting for her website. Everyone has one. If Truth Seeker was as smart as
>she thinks, she could easily create one. Even my cat has one.
First of all, I'm a he not a she, my name is Tim. Your starting
to sound like Tory, are you Tory? Why don't you make a web site
yourself and put the truth you have learned from 100's of posts on it
but explained in your own words? What's stopping you?
Truth Seeker
I see Truth Seeker's first post to a.r.s. as being 4 August 2003.
Using the search below in Google Groups I get 6,960 posts for
alt.religion.scientology where the author = "truth seeker"
http://groups.google.com/groups?safe=off&ie=UTF-8&oe=UTF-8&as_ugroup=...
or
http://tinyurl.com/2rp7o
There have been 271 days since Truth Seeker started posting.
6,960 divided by 271 = 25 posts per day (on average).
---
First apparent post by truthseeker was:
From: [email protected] (Truth Seeker)
Newsgroups: alt.religion.scientology
Subject: Is Spiritual growth a Mechanical process?
Date: 4 Aug 2003 01:55:02 -0700
Message-ID: <[email protected]>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 67.72.171.207
X-Complaints-To: [email protected]
I'm not sure what all Truth Seeker's accounts are, but here are a few
that he/she/it has burned through:
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
Not to sound dramatic, but I think we may be dealing with a sociopath here. He's certainly someone with a criminal disposition. I don't think he's capable of true remorse. Everything he does is agenda driven. Even his name is revealing, his avatar is revealing. Remember after the DC trial a strange man was seen getting into an elevator with a trench coat? Someone asked him who he was. His reply was "you don't need to know". No, I'm not saying this was MF. But look at his avatar a man in a trench coat standing under an eerie light. He has the same mindset as that OSA fuck at DC's trial, is my point.
I asked him last night why he chose his name 'misterfabian'. I waited almost 45 minutes for an answer, all the while I verified that he was signed in the whole time. Only when I posted to definition of 'fabian strategy' did he finally answer with that phony bs.
Anyway, he's not showing any true remorse or willingness to correct what he's done. He's even offering to remove that blog with conditions.
He's got to go. His presence is polluting.
What you thought is because I'm coming clean about things from my past that we are in a court of law and that I have answering every single question you put to me and tell you every single thing about my life or else I'm not really coming clean.
I answered your question and you just didn't accept my answer. Now you call me names.